Trials

South Asian communities in the UK experience disproportionate maternal and child health inequalities linked to non-recommended infant feeding practices, limited health literacy, and socioeconomic constraints. Participatory learning and action (PLA) is effective in low- and middle-income countries, but high-income evidence is scarce. This pilot assessed the feasibility of a community facilitator-led PLA intervention to improve infant feeding among South Asian families in East London. A three-arm pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN10234623) was conducted in Tower Hamlets and Newham, East London (May-September 2022), with 12 wards randomised 1:1:1 to face-to-face PLA, online PLA, or usual care. Multilingual community facilitators delivered eight biweekly sessions over 14 weeks. Feasibility outcomes were assessed against prespecified Go/Stop criteria; exploratory outcomes included child feeding behaviours (Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire, CEBQ), parental feeding style (Parental Feeding Style Questionnaire, PFSQ), and child BMI Z-scores. Of 263 enrolled participants, 261 had a recorded trial arm allocation; consent to the pilot feasibility study was 70.7% (186/263; 95% CI 65.0-75.9%) meeting the [≥]50% Go criterion. Attendance was 37% (Tower Hamlets 59%, Newham 29%), below the [≥]80% Go threshold. Six-month retention was 54.8% (Tower Hamlets 78%, Newham 48.5%; 95% CI 41.8-55.3%), triggering the Definite Stop criterion. Significant baseline imbalances included BMI Z-score (p = 0.005), ethnicity, borough, and education; no between-arm BMI differences were observed at follow-up (p = 0.249). CEBQ and PFSQ baseline completion was 24.5% and 23.0%, with no usable follow-up data. PLA Phases 3 and 4 were not completed by any group; all participants providing feedback reported it acceptable. Recruitment was feasible and the intervention acceptable, but a Definite Stop criterion was triggered in Newham, no group completed the full PLA cycle, and outcome data were insufficient for evaluation. A definitive trial requires stratified randomisation, digitised multilingual data collection, participant reimbursement, and explicit PLA phase-completion criteria.

Background: Digital reminders reduce outpatient no-shows, but the optimal timing and frequency of messages remain unclear, particularly in Latin American public health systems. We emulated a target trial to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of four WhatsApp reminder strategies on appointment absenteeism and patient-initiated cancellations. Methods: We analyzed administrative and electronic health-record data from the public health system of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina (June 2023-May 2024). Eligible individuals had scheduled an in-person outpatient appointment in one of 15 prioritized specialties at least 75 hours in advance and had a mobile phone on record. We compared four strategies: (1) dual reminders at ~72 and ~24 hours before the appointment; (2) a single reminder at ~72 hours; (3) a single reminder at ~24 hours; and (4) no reminders. The primary outcome was the proportion of no-shows by the end of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the cumulative incidence of patient-initiated cancellations overall, within 12 hours of the appointment, and followed by rebooking. We emulated the target trial using a cloning-censoring-weighting approach to estimate per-protocol controlled direct effects, with inverse-probability weights to address time-varying confounding and selection bias. Cumulative incidence of secondary outcomes was estimated using weighted Kaplan-Meier curves. Three pre-specified sensitivity analyses and standardized mean differences assessed robustness and covariate balance. Results: A total of 475,214 first eligible person-appointments were included; baseline no-show risk in the control arm was 34.6%. All three active strategies reduced no-shows compared with no reminders. The single 24-hour reminder produced the largest reduction (Risk Ratio [RR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.72, 0.81; Risk Difference [RD] -8.21 percentage points [pp], 95% CI -9.68, -6.54), followed by the dual-reminder strategy (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.79,0.81; RD -7.05 pp, 95% CI -7.41, -6.71) and the single 72-hour reminder (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84,0.99; RD -3.16 pp, 95% CI -5.69, -0.49). All active strategies increased patient-initiated cancellations relative to control, with the dual-reminder strategy producing the largest increase. Sensitivity analyses preserved the qualitative ranking of strategies across all specifications. Conclusions: In this large target trial emulation, a single just-in-time WhatsApp reminder sent ~24 hours before the appointment was as effective as a dual-reminder schedule in preventing no-shows and superior to a distal 72-hour reminder alone. Adding a second, distal reminder provided no measurable benefit for attendance but substantially increased patient-initiated cancellations, which may be operationally valuable when active slot reallocation is a goal. These findings support timing, rather than frequency, as the primary lever of digital-reminder effectiveness, and favor the deployment of a single proximal reminder as the default strategy in resource-constrained outpatient settings.

Importance Non-inferiority trials are becoming increasingly popular in abdominal surgery. The non- inferiority margin is critical in the interpretation and conclusion of these trials. Objective This systematic review aims to assess the methodological and reporting quality of non- inferiority randomized controlled trials in abdominal surgery. Evidence Review Non-inferiority trials were systematically identified by searching Ovid Medline, Embase and the CENTRAL databases from 2006 until December 2025. Randomized controlled trials in adult patients with any type of abdominal surgical intervention in at least one trial arm and a sample size greater than or equal to 100 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the definition of the non- inferiority margin. Secondary outcomes were the reporting of the non-inferiority margin, the robustness of its estimation, the uncertainty of the point estimate and the adequacy of conclusions. Findings A total of 11 045 trials were identified, of which 101 were eligible, enrolling 44 370 patients. Most trials provided a rationale for the non-inferiority design, while six (5.9%) trials did not. Previous literature was commonly used (n=56; 55.4%), but the non-inferiority margin was most often based on a clinical fixed margin or on historical comparison of the treatment and the active comparator. Based on the margin, investigators tolerated substantially worse outcomes of the treatment compared to the comparator. Conclusions were appropriate based on the confidence interval and the predefined non- inferiority margin in 88 (87.1%) of trials. The clinical judgement of the conclusion was overall adequate. Confidence interval estimations were reported in 16 (15.8%) of trials. Simulation studies were limited by the reporting quality. Conclusions and Relevance Clinical fixed margins are commonly used in abdominal surgery non-inferiority randomized controlled trials, however, substantial shortcomings in reporting limit the interpretability and reproduction of study findings. Based on the findings of this study, guidance on surgical- specific non-inferiority margin definitions is needed.

Background: Prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with inspiratory muscle weakness and difficulty weaning from respiratory support. While decades of research have demonstrated that inspiratory strength training (IST) is beneficial in adult critical care populations, the literature on its use in pediatric cardiac critical care remains limited. We sought to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and physiologic response to IST in children in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU). Methods and Results: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of children with congenital heart disease referred for IST between January 2015 and August 2021. Feasibility was defined as completion of [≥]1 IST session following referral. Safety outcomes included physiologic events documented during IST sessions. Changes in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) were assessed in patients who completed [≥]2 IST sessions. Of 105 eligible patients, 93 (89%) successfully completed at least 1 IST session. Monitoring events were reviewed across 389 IST sessions and included pre-oxygenation (62%), desaturations (13%), bradycardia (7%), and hypertension (2%). All events were transient and did not require escalation of care. 84% of patients were successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation and required a median of 2 (IQR 1-4) sessions of IST. Among patients completing [≥]2 IST sessions, MIP improved signicantly over time (p>0.0001). Improvements were observed in both patients who did and did not wean from mechanical ventilation. Patients who failed to wean from mechanical ventilation had longer ventilator exposure prior to IST initiation and were more sedated at the outset of IST. Conclusions: IST was feasible and well tolerated in this medically complex PCICU cohort. High completion rates and improvements in MIP support the use of IST as a clinically deliverable intervention that can produce measurable improvements in inspiratory muscle strength during critical illness.

Gaps remain in the evidence base for postoperative management following forefoot surgery. A recent randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04927234) demonstrated improved outcomes with intermittent one Hertz (Hz) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the common peroneal nerve. This sub-analysis evaluates its effect in patients undergoing forefoot surgery. Forty-two patients undergoing forefoot procedures were included; 26 received NMES plus standard of care (SOC) and 16 received SOC alone. Wound healing was assessed at 14 days. Edema was measured using the figure-of-eight (FO8) method. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). At 14 days, complete wound healing occurred in 77% of patients receiving NMES plus SOC compared with 40% in the SOC group (p<0.05). Edema reduction was significantly greater in the NMES group, with a 74% relative reduction compared with SOC (p=0.02). Intermittent one Hz NMES of the common peroneal nerve was associated with improved wound healing and reduced postoperative edema following forefoot surgery.

Bayesian borrowing of external information can improve trial efficiency, particularly in pediatric and rare disease settings where patient populations are limited, but may introduce bias and inflate the Type~I error rate when the trial differs from external studies. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) draft Bayesian guidance emphasizes careful evaluation of external information, prior specification, and assessment of operating characteristics. This paper compares three meta-analytic-predictive (MAP)-based methods for Bayesian borrowing: the MAP prior, robust MAP (RMAP) prior, and self-adapting mixture (SAM) prior. An adaptive platform trial design in Rett syndrome is used as a case study. Simulation studies evaluate frequentist operating characteristics under varying prior--data conflict, between-study heterogeneity, treatment effects, and clinically significant differences (CSDs) for the SAM prior. The MAP prior achieved the greatest efficiency when external and current data were compatible but exhibited the largest bias under substantial prior--data conflict. The RMAP priors improved robustness through fixed robust-component weights, whereas the SAM prior adaptively adjusted borrowing and was less sensitive to prior--data conflict while retaining efficiency gains when the data were compatible. Although the CSD influenced the degree of adaptive borrowing, as reflected by effective sample size, it had only a modest impact on frequentist operating characteristics. Sensitivity analyses using a skeptical robust component yielded similar qualitative conclusions, while accentuating the differences between the MAP and RMAP priors. These findings provide guidance for evaluating and selecting MAP-based borrowing strategies before trial implementation, particularly in rare disease settings, consistent with current FDA recommendations.

Background. Long COVID affects an estimated 400 million people worldwide, and is associated with low quality of life. Nearly all completed Long COVID clinical trials reported no benefit, and most required participants to travel to study sites. This requirement systematically excludes severely affected patients. Because there are numerous candidate therapeutics with established safety profiles and regulatory approvals for other indications, scaled, efficient evaluation of therapeutics is needed. Methods. We designed and are conducting a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase two trial of tirzepatide for Long COVID fatigue, using an entirely remote infrastructure. Design elements included electronic consent, identity and diagnosis verification through document upload, cold-chain delivery of an injectable study drug through a central pharmacy, shared decision-making for dose titration, repeated at-home capillary blood collection in a biospecimen subcohort, weekly participant touch points through study application, wrist-worn wearable monitoring, and clinical support. The trial is operating under FDA Investigational New Drug authorization. Results. This trial enrolled 1,058 participants in 73 days, at least double the rate of any other Long COVID trial. Mean baseline metrics include mean Fatigue Severity Scale of 59.3 (standard deviation [SD] 4.9), daily step count of 3,611 (SD 2,706, general population reference mean 7,731), EQ-5D-5L of 0.6 (SD 0.2), and FUNCAP27 4.0 (SD 1.0), which was a more severely affected population than other clinical trials that collected comparable data. Study processes are working as designed. Participants use existing advocacy and support channels to gather and communicate. Conclusions. A direct-to-participant, siteless infrastructure can support a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of an injectable drug at scale, accelerate accrual, and reach severely affected participants who are routinely excluded by site-based designs. Modernizing drug distribution and regulatory pathways is needed to realize the full potential of decentralized infrastructure for drug repurposing clinical trials.

We present our Stage-1 Registered Report as a full clinical trial article with all methods in past tense and including mock results, table and figures for the primary analysis. To remind the reader that this Stage-1 article is written before data collection, we highlight in color that these mock results are only for illustrative purposes and will be replaced by the actual results in the Stage-2 Registered Report. Background In patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, optimization of oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a critical. Although both positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) are employed during CPR, their respective impacts on clinically relevant outcomes is yet to be clearly established. Methods This investigator-initiated, pragmatic, registry-based, multicenter, triple-blind randomized controlled superiority trial evaluates whether applying 8 cm H2O PEEP during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves outcomes compared with ZEEP in adults with non-traumatic, non-drowning out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Pre-randomized CPR kits (1:1 PEEP vs. sham) were used by ambulance sites during manual ventilation throughout the resuscitation process. The primary analysis was conducted in the principal stratum of patients who received either a supraglottic airway or endotracheal tube. The primary outcome was neurological status at hospital discharge measured by a utility-weighted score on the modified Rankin Scale. Secondary outcomes included prehospital return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and 6-month quality of life. The primary safety outcome was clinically significant pneumothorax.

Background Trial participation effect, defined as a change in clinical outcomes associated with trial enrolment regardless of allocation, is understudied in neonatal trials in low- and middle income countries (LMIC), despite its importance for trial design, interpretation, and research ethics. This study aimed to quantify the trial participation effect and explore potential ways by which research participation may influence neonatal survival. Methods This observational cohort study included neonates weighing <2Kg and aged <24h who were admitted to a Gambian referral hospital and either enrolled in a clinical trial comparing early versus later KMC (eKMC trial;2018 to 2020) or not enrolled due to operational constraints and hence received standard, non research care. All infants were prospectively followed until inpatient discharge or death. The eKMC trial previously found no important effect of early KMC on all cause neonatal mortality. For this analysis, inpatient mortality rates were compared using a generalised linear model, adjusting for baseline differences in participant characteristics. Prospectively collected data on small and sick newborn care readiness and delivery during the trial period were used to explore how trial participation may have influenced survival. Results A total of 545 neonates were included: 279 enrolled in the trial and 266 not enrolled, predominantly due to the absence of an available caregiver. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, although differences were seen in twin status, place of birth, and age at admission. Trial participation was associated with an absolute reduction in inpatient mortality of 6.3% (22.6% (63/279) among enrolled versus 28.9% (77/266) among non enrolled) and a relative reduction of 29% (aRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.96). This association varied by season, with no evidence of benefit during the dry season (aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.58), but a 40% reduction in adjusted mortality risk during the rainy season (aRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.87)(Interaction test: p=0.086). Trial participants had access to laboratory diagnostics and received more intensive clinical monitoring, including higher staffing ratios, continuous pulse oximetry, structured education of carers on neonatal danger signs, and enhanced scrutiny of clinical management compared to neonates receiving routine care. Conclusion Trial participation was associated with a substantial reduction in inpatient mortality, suggesting that participation effects should be considered when designing, interpreting, and reporting neonatal clinical trials in LMIC settings. The association was evident only during the rainy season. The participation effect may have been mediated by increased clinical oversight and monitoring, additional nursing support, and access to diagnostic investigations, all of which should be prioritised within routine care to accelerate progress towards SDG neonatal survival targets.

Rationale: Dislocation is the leading reason for early revision surgery. To address the problem of dislocation, the dual-mobility (DM) cup was developed in France in the 1970s. This cup should provide more stability and biomechanically reduce the risk of dislocation. In the Netherlands, most DM cups are placed in specific patients, e.g. with cognitive impairment and for revisions due to recurrent dislocations. Despite the increased and, in some countries, broad use of DM cups, high quality evidence of their (cost)effectiveness is lacking. This study aims to perform a trial to fill this gap in knowledge. Much of the information needed to judge the effectiveness of DM cups is already incorporated in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). This register lends itself perfectly for a nested RCT towards this aim. Objective: The primary objective is to investigate whether there is a difference in the number of hip dislocations following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), using the posterolateral approach, with a DM cup compared to a unipolar cup in elderly patients 1 year after surgery. The secondary objectives are: to investigate whether there is a difference in the number of revisions; to investigate what the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility is of a DM cup compared to a unipolar cup at 1 year follow-up; to investigate whether there is a difference in the number of hip dislocations and revisions between a DM cup and a unipolar cup 2 years after surgery; to investigate whether there is a difference in patient reported outcomes between a DM cup compared to a unipolar cup 1 and 2 years after surgery; to compare the number of hip dislocations, revisions and PROM data between patients in the randomized DM group and patients in an observational cohort DM group. Finally, long-term survival of DM and unipolar cups will be evaluated based on revision and mortality data registered in the LROI. Study design: Prospective multi-center international wide within the European Union (EU), single blinded RCT, nested in the national registry. Study population: Patients [&ge;] 70 years old, undergoing an elective primary THA. Intervention (if applicable): The intervention group receives a THA with a dual mobility cup, the control group receives a THA with a unipolar cup. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary: The number of dislocations. Secondary: costs, patient reported outcomes and implant survival.

Background: Chronic intestinal failure is a devastating rare disease in which patients require complex and life-saving parenteral nutrition or intravenous fluids delivered through a central venous catheter. There is a shortage of clinical expertise to manage chronic intestinal failure and patients in the United States lack access to the limited number of expert care centers. We developed a patient intestinal failure (PIF) ECHO intervention with patient advocates who have lived experience with the goal of connecting patients and family caregivers virtually to multidisciplinary intestinal failure experts for best practice learning. Objective: We pilot-tested the acceptability and feasibility of a direct-to-patient telelearning program based on the well-established ECHO Model focused on best practices in chronic intestinal failure care. Setting and Participants: 19 adults with chronic intestinal failure attended the pilot PIF-ECHO program for 12 consecutive weeks via Zoom between April and July 2026. All participants completed the post intervention questionnaire and 16 individuals participated in 3 focus groups. Design: A mixed methods evaluation was conducted. Questionnaires were assessed according to seven domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and qualitative data from the virtual focus groups were coded and analyzed using iterative thematic analysis. A data-derived PIF-ECHO logic model was developed to illustrate pathways between the program content and anticipated outcomes. Results: There was strong or very strong agreement that sessions were accessible, enjoyable, worth the time spent, and improved understanding of intestinal failure and its management. Information learned increased confidence for self-advocacy in navigating healthcare needs, disease and therapy self-management, and improved well-being. Interaction with facilitators, expert presenters, and peers was positive, judgement free, validating, and respectful. Participants felt empowered and reported lower levels of emotional strain due to the supportive resources and knowledge gained. Conclusions: A patient-facing tele-learning program in chronic intestinal failure is feasible, accessible, and acceptable to patients and appears to result in important short-term and medium-term benefits. The program was perceived as valuable and notably different from patient and peer-led support groups. The model could be applied more widely to other rare diseases. Lived Experience and Patient Contributions: Four patient advocates with lived experience in chronic intestinal failure were involved throughout the study including pre-study interviews and focus groups to inform PIF-ECHO design and content, recruitment, as presenters on topics of self-advocacy and role of patient support groups, and in the analysis and refinement of the program logic model. Their input shaped the relevance and acceptability of the PIF-ECHO pilot program. All four patient advocates fulfil uniform requirements for authorship and are co-authors on this paper. This work documents a meaningful partnership in the creation of a patient-facing virtual tele-learning adaptation of the ECHO model and establishes a valuable collaboration for future study of PIF-ECHO on a larger scale.

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) disproportionately burdens underserved communities, where social determinants of health (SDOH) perpetuate persistent disparities. Family-based interventions leveraging social support represent a promising yet understudied approach. We describe the rationale, design, and methods of the Skills-based Educational strategies for the Reduction of Vascular Events in Orange County (SERVE OC) RCT and present baseline characteristics of enrolled families. Methods: SERVE OC is a 2-arm RCT of 190 Latino and Vietnamese families (486 individuals) randomized to the family-based intervention or individual self-management. The intervention was grounded in social network theory while employing community engaged strategies. Primary outcomes include achieving ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) defined by AHA Life's Essential 8 (LE8) and systolic blood pressure reduction at 12, 24, and 36 months. Baseline assessments include demographics, LE8, psychosocial factors, food security, and SDOH. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses examined cohort characteristics and associations between SDOH, food security, and LE8. Results: Over 83% of participants had suboptimal LE8 scores. Average adult total LE8 scores were 66.61 {plus minus}11.96, with physical activity as the weakest domain, compared to an average of 76.52{plus minus}10.15 in children. Greater SDOH burden and food security were associated with significantly lower odds of ideal CVH and lower LE8 scores respectively. Conclusions: SERVE OC demonstrates the feasibility of enrolling families in community-engaged RCT targeting CVD disparities in underserved population. Baseline findings confirm substantial CVD risk and SDOH burden underscoring the need for multi-level, culturally tailored interventions. Trials results will inform scalable, family-focused strategies for CVD prevention across the life course. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique Identifier: NCT05641519.

Background Mirror therapy (MT)-specifically paradigms using mirror visual feedback (MVF)-is widely used in neurorehabilitation; however, mechanistic implementations vary substantially in movement content, rhythmicity and attentional demands. This protocol describes an acute mechanistic, within-participant fNIRS screening study designed to compare three prespecified upper-limb mirror-therapy task paradigms and to quantify associated subjective experience after each condition in healthy adults during a single visit. Methods and analysis This is a single-centre, within-participant, randomised crossover study conducted at Wuhan Wuchang Hospital (Wuhan, China). Healthy adults aged 18-35 years will complete three task conditions once each in a counterbalanced order using a 3*3 Latin-square scheme: UMT1 (task-oriented rhythmic functional movement), UMT2 (open-ended free movement with auditory control), and UMT3 (non-functional rhythmic movement). fNIRS will be acquired using the NirSmart-6000A system during a standardised block design. The primary outcome is ROI-level HbO activation quantified as GLM-derived {beta} estimates within the prespecified primary ROIs (bilateral SM1/M1 and bilateral PMC). Secondary outcomes include ROI-level windowed {Delta}HbO (5-20 s post-onset relative to the immediately preceding rest; descriptive only), ROI-level {Delta}HbR, and post-condition subjective ratings (illusion, immersion, confusion and fatigue; 1-7 Likert). Condition effects will be analysed using linear mixed-effects models with fixed effects for condition and period and prespecified multiplicity-adjusted pairwise contrasts. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Approval No.: 2025-112-01; approved on 2025-08-21). The study is expected to be minimal risk. Findings will be disseminated through publication of this protocol manuscript and subsequent results manuscripts and conference presentations. Trial registration number Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2600116634). This study is conducted as a prespecified mechanistic sub-study under the overarching registered project.

Background Late-stage cancer incidence is being considered as an earlier endpoint in cancer-screening trials, but its trial-level association with cancer-specific mortality may depend on evidence selection and endpoint harmonization. We evaluated the robustness of this association to source-verified additions. Methods We reconstructed the PubMed corpus underlying a 41-comparison review. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview was used only to prioritize reports for blinded human reassessment. Reviewers determined eligibility, linked reports from the same trial, harmonized endpoints, and verified comparison-level data. We recalculated unweighted Pearson correlations overall and by cancer type after adding earliest-compatible trial comparisons. Results Among 1209 candidate records, 996 PDFs were assessed. Thirty-three reports absent from the source review were prioritized; 26 were eligible, representing 18 trials, and 8 provided compatible comparisons. Adding these comparisons increased the dataset from 41 to 49 and attenuated the overall correlation from 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55 to 0.85) to 0.59 (95% CI = 0.37 to 0.75). Updated correlations were 0.49 (95% CI = -0.26 to 0.87) for breast, -0.23 (95% CI = -0.71 to 0.40) for colorectal, and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.54 to 0.95) for lung cancer. One sparse-event comparison influenced the colorectal estimate. Conclusions The overall association was sensitive to evidence composition, and cancer-specific stability varied. Late-stage incidence should be evaluated by cancer type and with prespecified sensitivity analyses for evidence selection and endpoint definitions. Model-assisted prioritization cannot replace human eligibility review, trial reconciliation, and source verification.

Introduction We are currently working on the BEARS (Both Ears) virtual reality (VR) Randomised Controlled Trial. We are recruiting 272 deaf children and young people who use bilateral (both ears) cochlear implants (CI) to examine if using the BEARS VR games helps their hearing in background noise and ultimately their quality of life. Clinical trial participants should be representative of the population with the health condition, although this is rarely achieved in practice as people from ethnic minorities or those from more deprived areas may face barriers to participation. Study Design Mixed methods design Objectives Use a literature review and collection of data from cochlear implant centres to establish the sociodemographic characteristics of deaf children aged 8 to 16 years with bilateral cochlear implants in the United Kingdom (UK). a. Establish the sociodemographic characteristics of the families recruited to the BEARS clinical trial in the first six months, and compare with the age-matched population of deaf children with bilateral cochlear implants in the UK. b. Analyse the BEARS clinical trial pre-screening diversity data. c. Implement an established recruitment intervention method in a workshop to explore and optimise recruitment number and diversity. d. Compare the final six months of recruitment data diversity with the initial six months. Use interviews and focus groups to collect qualitative data from children and their families who chose not to take part in BEARS, clinicians, and family representatives (e.g. teachers) to explore barriers and facilitators to families taking part in BEARS. Amend the BEARS scale-up plan based on new learning. Methods Literature and scoping reviews, quantitative analysis of BEARS recruitment data, in-depth interviews, paired interviews, focus groups Sample size Qualitative sample: 10-15 children aged 8-16 with bilateral CI, 10-15 parents/carers of children with bilateral CI, 10-12 clinicians and 10-12 family representatives. Significance This work will evaluate how diverse the BEARS clinical trial recruitment is and whether it is representative of the UK population of children with bilateral cochlear implants. We will investigate recruitment barriers and implement measures to try to improve recruitment diversity.

Research replication is essential to build trust in evidence produced from real-world data. However, methods for conducting and reporting these studies are lacking, particularly related to data quality and fitness assessments. We replicated a single-center study from Children's Hospital of Atlanta in a multi-institutional learning network (PEDSnet) to evaluate the long-term effects of hydroxyurea in children with severe sickle cell disease (SS/S{beta}0 genotype). An AS-IS arm applied the original study's criteria with no major data quality adjustments, while a Data Fitness Enhanced (DFE) arm used systematic data fitness assessment to inform adjustments to cohort inclusion criteria and variable definitions; both arms then replicated the original study's primary analyses. Data quality checks in the DFE arm refined cohort criteria and improved hydroxyurea capture, drug era computation, and hematology specialist mapping. The DFE cohort produced average treatment effects with higher face validity and greater concordance with the original study (e.g., change in ED visits: -0.44 (CI -0.60, -0.26) versus -0.36 (CI -0.57, -0.16) in the original study) than the AS-IS cohort (-0.08 (CI -0.26, 0.09)), which yielded several implausible results. These findings show that superficially plausible cohort characteristics do not guarantee valid results without transparent, systematic data fitness assessment.

Objective: To identify patient, clinician, therapist and service priorities for a health-literacy intervention combining patient education with patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) feedback in routine hand surgery and hand therapy. Methods: A qualitative co-design study was undertaken across public and private hand-care contexts in New South Wales, Australia. Twelve stakeholders participated: five consumers, three hand surgeons, one hand therapist and three administrative/managerial staff. Individual interviews plus a clinician group discussion were conducted. Data were collected in March 2026, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and de-identified. General inductive thematic analysis was undertaken in NVivo by one researcher, with final themes reviewed by co-investigators. Results: Four themes guided intervention design: (1) providing information is not enough, it must be understood, retained and reinforced; (2) patients need a practical roadmap of diagnosis, treatment, recovery and rehabilitation; (3) education should be multimodal, reusable and adaptable to individual needs; and (4) PROMs should improve the clinical conversation rather than become another burden. Participants supported brief, accessible PROMs and visual feedback over time, but views differed on comparison with other patients because benchmarking could either reassure or create anxiety and unrealistic expectations. Conclusion: Health-literate hand care requires more than readable leaflets. It requires repeated, practical and adaptable communication across the care pathway, with PROM feedback embedded in patient-clinician conversations. Practice implications: Hand services should pair standardized core education with flexible delivery and use brief PROMs as conversation tools. Longitudinal displays may support monitoring and shared decisions, while group comparisons should be optional and carefully explained.

Background Treatment of Raynaud phenomenon(RP) with oral vasodilators(calcium channel block-ers and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors) has shown moderate efficacy, may not benefit to all patients, and adverse effects often compromise long-term treatment. In addition, a large placebo effect may jeopardize the assessment of treatment benefits. Pharmaconutritional strategies aiming at increasing nitric oxide bioavailability (beet-root juice and L-citrulline) may be promising alternatives, and we further hypothesized that patient preference for a treatment could be a driver of the response. Methods This study consisted of a series of randomized, double-blind, N-of-1 trials conducted in outpa-tients with primary or secondary RP. Each patient underwent a multiple crossover design with repeated blocks of randomized treatments periods: 2 weeks of placebo, 2 weeks of active treat-ments, and 1 week of washout. Outcomes included the Raynaud Condition Score(RCS), fre-quency and daily duration of attacks. Each patient prespecified its preferred primary outcome, efficacy threshold and preferred treatment, which was used for stratified randomization. Gener-alized linear mixed-effects models were used to determine individual and aggregated efficacy. Results Twenty-one patients completed 2 to 8 treatment blocks. Seventeen patients tested L-citrulline, 17 beetroot juice and 13 both treatments. Ten patients selected RCS as a primary outcome, 6 patients the number of attacks and 5 the duration of attacks. Me-dian threshold for considering treatment efficacy chosen by patients was 50% (min-max 20% to 75%) reduction of symptoms. Using individual criteria to define efficacy neither L-citrulline nor beetroot juice showed significant efficacy compared to baseline. Based on the aggregated data, our results show no significant difference between L-citrulline and the L-citrulline-based placebo, nor between beetroot juice and nitrate-depleted beetroot juice, with the exception of the daily duration of RP attacks with beetroot juice (p=0.002). Finally, there was a marked placebo response, notably when patients received their preferred treatment. Conclusions: Our study did not show significant beetroot juice or L-citrulline efficacy in RP. However, we found that individual preference for one treatment over another maximizes responses to both placebo and active treatments, particularly with regard to the frequency and duration of RP attacks, thus suggesting that a real and modifiable placebo effect exists in RP.

Abstract Preventable neonatal deaths remain a major public health problem in Zimbabwe, where near-universal antenatal and facility-delivery coverage coexist with a rising neonatal mortality rate. This study evaluated whether institutionalising three core "vital signs" of the community health system (a trained village health worker (VHW) workforce, functional community governance structures, and modified women's and men's participatory learning and action groups) reduces preventable neonatal deaths in Mashonaland West Province. An embedded QUAN (qual) mixed-methods design was used, with a two-arm, parallel-group cluster-randomised controlled trial as the dominant strand. Fifty-two ward-level clusters were randomised 1:1 to the institutionalised community health system package or to standard Ministry of Health and Child Care community services, and 984 pregnant women were enrolled between 1 September 2020 and 31 October 2021, with each mother-infant pair followed to 28 days after delivery, yielding 973 mother-infant pairs for intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome was neonatal death within 28 days of life, expressed per 1,000 live births. The primary analysis used a three-level mixed-effects log-binomial regression model with cluster and community-health-worker random intercepts, adjusted for pre-specified covariates. Supervised machine-learning classifiers with leave-one-cluster-out cross-validation, Cox proportional-hazards regression, and multilevel logistic models were fitted as supplementary analyses. An embedded longitudinal process evaluation used key informant interviews and focus group discussions, which were analysed thematically and integrated with the quantitative findings. The neonatal mortality rate was 44.8 per 1,000 live births in the intervention arm versus 110.1 per 1,000 in the control arm. The adjusted risk ratio for neonatal death was 0.43 (95% CI 0.26-0.70; p < 0.001), a 57% relative reduction, with a number needed to treat of 16 mother-infant pairs (95% CI 11-29). Low birthweight (<2,500 g), birth interval under two years, and low community women's literacy were the strongest risk factors, while trained VHWs, functional community governance, early antenatal care, and sustained participatory group attendance were independently protective. The women's and men's groups were protective in a dose-dependent manner, becoming significant at four or more cycles (about 14 meetings) (adjusted odds ratio 0.71; 95% CI 0.60-0.85; p = 0.001). A random forest classifier discriminated against neonatal deaths with a cross-validated area under the curve of 0.842 and a sensitivity of 0.912. Qualitative findings converged with the trial results, identifying male engagement, earlier care-seeking, danger-sign literacy, social-network activation, and community death audits as the behavioural and structural mechanisms of change. Institutionalising the community health system package (trained VHWs, functional governance, early antenatal engagement, and sustained participatory groups) was associated with a substantial reduction in preventable neonatal deaths. The findings suggest that in high-coverage, high-mortality settings, the binding constraint is structural rather than clinical, and that scaling functional community governance and workforce infrastructure in the most disadvantaged communities may accelerate progress toward neonatal survival targets. The principal limitations are a one-year follow-up period, the rarity of neonatal death, and concurrent national programming that only partially reached the control clusters. Trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, PACTR202607591142118 (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=PACTR202607591142118); registered retrospectively on 7 July 2026.

Purpose To estimate the per-protocol effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategies on ICU-acquired infection in critically ill adults with sepsis using a target trial emulation framework. We evaluated whether restrictive strategy and liberal strategy, defined by hemoglobin (Hgb) thresholds, differ in their effect on ICU-acquired infection during ICU stay. Methods We conducted a target trial emulation using the MIMIC-IV database and included adults who met Sepsis criteria at ICU admission. Clones were assigned to restrictive or liberal transfusion strategies. Under the restrictive strategy, RBC transfusion was permitted only when Hgb was [&le;]7.0 g/dL, whereas under the liberal strategy, transfusion was permitted when Hgb was >7.0 g/dL. The primary outcome was the first ICU-acquired infection occurring at least 72 hours after ICU admission. Per-protocol effects were estimated using a clone-censor-weight approach with a marginal structural model. A parametric g-formula was used as a complementary analysis that jointly modeled ICU discharge and ICU mortality as competing events to derive strategy-specific 28-day cumulative incidences and risk differences. Results 8 Among 4,013 eligible ICU stays, the liberal-versus-restrictive comparison provided little evidence of a difference in the risk of ICU-acquired infection (adjusted conditional OR, 0.954; 95% CI, 0.797 to 1.142). In the complementary g-formula analysis, the 28-day risk difference for the liberal versus restrictive comparison was -0.02 percentage points (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.11), consistent with the primary analysis. Findings were generally robust across prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion In this target trial emulation of adults with sepsis, we observed no clinically meaningful difference in ICU-acquired infection between RBC transfusion strategies defined by hemoglobin thresholds.