Trials

Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often have incomplete methods reporting despite widespread adoption of the CONSORT guideline. The editorial process is supposed to detect these shortcomings and request clarifications from authors, which is time-consuming. We developed an LLM-based CONSORT Rohe Nordberg Report that highlights which CONSORT items appear fully or partially reported and checks page references claimed by authors, and then creates follow up questions for authors to more easily correct missing information. Methods This parallel-arm, superiority RCT will randomize eligible RCT submissions (after desk screening) 1:1 into intervention (editorial team and authors receive the Rohe Nordberg Report) or control (standard editorial review only). The primary outcome is whether manuscripts improve their reporting of CONSORT items in the Methods and Results sections between the original submission and first revision. This will be assessed by blinded human reviewers who evaluate the textual changes for improvements between the original and revised manuscripts for each relevant CONSORT item. Secondary outcomes include time to editorial decisions, rejection and non-resubmission rates, if authors can correctly identify where CONSORT items are reported, and extent of revisions. Human evaluators will be blinded to whether the manuscript was in the intervention or control group. Discussion By providing authors and the editorial team with specific follow up questions for each underreported CONSORT item, we hypothesize that basic underreporting will be more efficiently detected and corrected. Using blinded human reviewers as the primary outcome assessors ensures a rigorous, unbiased evaluation. If successful, this approach may help align manuscripts more closely with CONSORT standards, ultimately benefiting evidence synthesis.

Objectives: To assess the availability of key clinical trial registration data and compliance with legal reporting requirements for all Phase 2-4 drug trials registered on the new European Clinical Trial Information System (CTIS) registry. This study is the first ever assessment of data quality and legal compliance with reporting requirements on CTIS. Design: Cross-sectional observational study of CTIS registry data combined with manual review of results documents. Setting: Cohort of all 7,547 Phase II-IV clinical trials registered on CTIS as of November 2025. Main outcome measures: Number and proportion of missing data points in CTIS registration data. Proportion of completed clinical trials that are compliant with regulatory reporting requirements. Results: Trial registration data quality was high overall with more than 99% of expected data present. Of 234 clinical trials legally required to report results, fewer than half (49.6%) fully reported results within the required timeframe, 20 trials (8.5%) fully reported results late, and 98 trials (41.9%) failed to fully report results. Legal compliance was similar for adult trials (79/158) and paediatric trials (37/76). Conclusions: Sponsor compliance with legal reporting requirements is weak. Current efforts by European regulators to monitor and enforce compliance appear to be insufficient. New results reporting functions currently being set up by trial registries worldwide will require quality assurance processes. Trial registration: Study protocol prospectively registered on OSF: https://osf.io/sn4j2/overview

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can cause pain and severe walking limitation. Although surgery aims to improve walking, many patients do not achieve clinically meaningful gains. Rehabilitation can improve outcomes, yet existing programmes lack robust evidence and theoretical underpinning. This study aimed to (1) co-design a theory-informed rehabilitation programme to improve walking after LSS surgery, and (2) evaluate feasibility of conducting a future trial and acceptability of the intervention. Methods: A multi-methods study included intervention co-design followed by a single-arm feasibility study. Co-design used an adapted Experience-Based Co-Design approach with patients, carers, and healthcare professionals (n=39), integrating the Behaviour Change Wheel. This resulted in STructured Rehabilitation and InDividualised Exercise and Education (STRIDE), delivered over 12-week pre- and 12-weeks post-surgery, targeting knowledge, expectations, perceived control, physical capability, and fears. Adults aged [≥]50 years awaiting LSS surgery were recruited to a before-after feasibility study. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention. Acceptability was assessed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability questionnaire (0-5 (high acceptability)) and focus groups. Clinical outcomes measured at baseline, post-prehabilitation, and post-rehabilitation included 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and mean daily step count over 7 days. Results: Fifteen of 31 eligible participants were recruited (48%; mean age 70 years), with 80% retained to study end (2 decided against surgery, 1 unable to complete final assessment). Acceptability was high (median 5/5, IQR 0). Participants valued the personalised, supportive approach and reported improved motivation and preparation for surgery, though travel was burdensome. Small pre-operative and moderate-to-large post-operative improvements were observed in 6MWD (+49.9 m and +81.6 m) and daily step count (+868 and +1405 steps/day). Conclusions: This co-designed, physiotherapy-led, behaviour-change rehabilitation programme was acceptable to participants, with encouraging recruitment, retention, and signals of improved walking following LSS surgery. The findings support progression to a future trial.

Background. Recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) claimed efficacy of higher-dose fluvoxamine (2 x 100 mg/day, as opposed to 2 x 50 mg/day) in prevention of disease deterioration in adults with mild - moderate COVID-19 disease. Objectives. Investigate whether such claims are supported by the data. Methods. Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating higher-dose fluvoxamine in this indication. Results. Seven studies declared as RCTs were identified, one of which was severely biased (open-label, non-standardized and unreported standard of care as a control), and eventually ended as non-randomized (huge attrition). Composite endpoints of deterioration in the 6 included placebo-controlled trials contained elements susceptible to error and bias. Three trials were small (<100 patients/arm), three were larger (270 - 750 patients/arm). Deaths and need for mechanical ventilation were sporadic and observed in only one trial. Hospitalizations were also sporadic in 5/6 trials. Frequentist methods generally appropriate for random-effects analysis of low number of trials with rare outcomes (generalized linear mixed models, beta-binomial or binomial-normal) greatly underestimated heterogeneity, but still did not document benefits regarding the composite endpoints or hospitalizations. Bayesian hierarchical models revealed huge heterogeneity and indicated no benefit regarding: (i) composites of deterioration, large trials OR = 0.78 (95% CrI 0.55 - 1.21); multiplicity corrected OR = 0.87 (0.64 - 1.21); (ii) hospitalizations, small trials OR = 0.88 (0.45 - 1.72); large trials OR = 0.94 (0.52 - 1.75); all trials OR = 0.81 (0.47 - 1.43). Heterogeneity was unlikely due to clinical particulars (vaccination status, treatment duration, time horizon), and more likely due to unidentified bias. Conclusions. RCTs do not support efficacy of higher-dose fluvoxamine in prevention of disease deterioration in adults with mild - moderate COVID-19 disease.

Background: Moderate- to high-intensity walking training (M-HIT) is an established intervention for improving walking capacity in chronic stroke. Musculoskeletal (MSK) adverse events commonly occur during M-HIT, yet tools to identify individuals at higher risk are limited. Baseline clinical characteristics may provide insight into susceptibility to training-related MSK adverse events during M-HIT. Thus, this study aimed to develop and internally validate a model for predicting MSK adverse events during a 12-week M-HIT program in chronic stroke using baseline clinical characteristics. Methods: Participants (n=100) from HIT-Stroke Trials 1 and 2 were included. Baseline clinical characteristics included measures of orthopedic history, pre-existing pain, motor function, recent exercise history, demographics and health characteristics, stroke chronicity, and psychological health. Logistic regression models evaluated all possible combinations of baseline characteristics with up to three predictors. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used for internal validation to mitigate overfitting. Predictive performance was quantified using the C-statistic, and the candidate model with the highest cross-validated C-statistic was selected as the final model. Results: MSK adverse events occurred in 32.0% of participants. The optimal three-variable model included prior orthopedic condition (Odds ratio [OR] 3.02 [95% CI 1.14-8.64]), Fugl-Meyer lower extremity motor score (OR 1.14 [95% CI 1.02-1.28]), and self-reported participation in regular walking exercise (OR 0.17 [95% CI 0.05-0.49]) at baseline. This model demonstrated moderate discrimination (cross-validated C-statistic = 0.74; apparent C-statistic = 0.78). Conclusions: Participants reporting at least one pre-existing lower extremity or lumbar spine orthopedic condition and those with better lower-extremity motor function exhibited greater odds of experiencing MSK adverse events during M-HIT, while participants reporting participation in regular walking exercise had lower odds. These findings suggest that baseline clinical characteristics may help identify individuals at elevated risk for MSK adverse events during M-HIT who may warrant closer monitoring or risk-reduction strategies. Future studies are needed for external validation. Clinical Trial Registration: https://ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT03760016, NCT06268041

ObjectiveThis study evaluates the impact of systemic GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use on surgical wound healing in high-risk surgical populations, including patients with diabetes, and implications for perioperative planning and healing outcomes. ApproachThis pilot retrospective cohort study compared adult surgery patients with non-healing postoperative wounds by their GLP-1RA use. Outcomes included healing status, time to wound closure, and number of surgical interventions. ResultsThe cohort included 35 non-GLP-1RA users and 16 GLP-1RA users with comparable baseline characteristics, except for significant higher prevalence of venous insufficiency among users. Though median time to closure was similar for all patients, users required fewer surgical interventions and their wounds reached closure in significant difference from non-users. Among patients with diabetes, all GLP-1RA users healed significantly compared to non-users. InnovationThe impact of GLP-1RA therapy on wound healing in high-risk reconstructive and soft-tissue surgery remains poorly defined. This pilot cohort addresses that gap, offering an early signal that GLP-1RA use is associated with improved wound healing and fewer postoperative interventions. These findings may inform perioperative practice by identifying a systemic pharmacologic factor that optimizes surgical outcomes in high-risk populations. ConclusionGLP-1RA use was associated with higher healing rates and fewer interventions, particularly among patients with diabetes. These findings support a beneficial role in surgical wound healing and warrant larger multi-site studies.

Background: Mainstreaming genetic testing has emerged as a strategy to improve access and reduce wait times for patients who may benefit from genetic testing. Ensuring patients fully grasp the implications of testing when formal genetic counselling is not provided, remains a focus for ongoing research. Methods: Patients diagnosed with hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy were offered genetic testing between September 2024 and September 2025 through either the mainstreaming model conducted in cardiology clinics or a referral to Medical Genetics where patients attended an online webinar or a one-on-one genetic counselling appointment. Uptake of testing, time to testing, informed choice and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Results: Among patients offered genetic testing, uptake was higher in the mainstreaming pathway (82%) compared with a referral to Medical Genetics (69%). The difference in access was predominately due to patients not following through with their Genetics referral. Mainstreaming reduced wait times where patients referred to Genetics waited a median of 94-185 additional days to be offered genetic testing. Despite improved access, only 62% of mainstreamed patients were considered informed, compared to 91% of patients that attended a patient webinar through Medical Genetics (p < 0.01). Satisfaction with decision-making was high across both pathways. Conclusion: Integrating genetic testing into cardiology practices increased access and reduced wait times; however, patients demonstrated significantly lower rates of informed decision making compared to those who attended a patient webinar offered through Medical Genetics. These findings highlight the importance of structured education to support informed decision making within mainstreaming pathways.

Objective To map the presence, public availability, and content of clinical trial data sharing policies (DSP), data management and sharing plans (DMSP), and data use agreements (DUA) among the most prolific public and private clinical trial sponsors operating in the European Union, and to identify key areas of convergence, divergence, and constraint in the context of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Eligibility criteria We included organisation-level documents describing approaches to clinical trial data sharing or data management from the top 20 public and top 20 private sponsors ranked by the number of trials registered in the EU Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS). Eligible materials comprised publicly available or sponsor-shared policies, guidelines, statements, templates, and agreements relevant to clinical trial data sharing or management. Sources of evidence Evidence was identified through systematic searches of sponsors' public websites, structured Google searches, and major data management plan platforms (DMPTool, DMPonline, DMP Assistant), complemented by direct contact with sponsors to verify findings and request missing documentation. All sources were archived and catalogued. Charting methods Two reviewers independently extracted data using a structured form, capturing the existence, accessibility, and content of data sharing policies, data management and sharing plans, and data use agreements. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively, and a non-interpretive descriptive content analysis was conducted to characterise recurring policy elements and areas of heterogeneity. Results Among 40 sponsors, private sponsors were substantially more likely than public sponsors to make trial-specific data sharing policies and data use agreements publicly accessible, often via established data sharing platforms. Public sponsors more frequently referenced data management and sharing plans, but these were heterogeneous in scope and often embedded within broader institutional governance documents rather than tailored to clinical trials. Across sectors, GDPR compliance, data protection, and legal safeguards were emphasised, while operational aspects such as dataset readiness, review criteria, and downstream responsibilities varied widely. Overall response rate to sponsor verification was 37.5%. Conclusion Clinical trial data sharing governance in the EU shows a marked sectoral imbalance among the top sponsors. Private sponsors tend to provide more detailed and operationally explicit documentation, whereas public sponsors often articulate high-level commitments without trial-specific guidance. Greater clarity and standardisation, particularly among public sponsors, could improve transparency and facilitate responsible data reuse, while remaining compatible with GDPR requirements.

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures provide essential data on treatment quality across diverse populations. The FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module was developed to assess outcomes specific to facial skin cancer patients. Longitudinal data characterizing outcome trajectories from surgery through early recovery remain limited. Objective: We tracked how patient outcomes change from preoperatively through three months after surgery using the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module in a prospective cohort of 288 patients undergoing facial skin cancer surgery. Methods: Participants completed the module preoperatively and at 1 week and 3 months postoperatively. Five scales were evaluated: Appearance, Psychosocial Distress, Cancer Worry, Scars, and Adverse Effects. Friedman tests assessed overall change across timepoints; paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests evaluated pairwise comparisons. Results: Of 288 enrolled patients (mean age 68.6+/-11.9 years, 46.5% female), 252 (87.5%) and 220 (76.4%) completed 1-week and 3-month follow-up, respectively. Facial appearance declined at 1 week (55.6 to 52.0, p=0.005) and returned to baseline by 3 months (57.0, p=0.274). Psychosocial distress increased acutely (14.5 to 19.0, p<0.001) with partial recovery at 3 months (17.1, p=0.012). Cancer worry decreased substantially (delta=-7.8, SRM=-0.54, p<0.001), and scar satisfaction improved from 1 week to 3 months (delta=+9.4, SRM=0.54, p<0.001). Adverse effects showed the largest improvement (delta=-12.8, SRM=-0.88, p<0.001). Women showed less improvement in facial appearance than men (delta=-2.2 vs +4.9, p=0.022). Clinical meaningfulness was assessed using minimally important difference thresholds: 36.9% of patients achieved meaningful improvement in appearance, 39.6% remained stable, and 23.4% experienced meaningful deterioration. Conclusions: Short-term outcomes follow a predictable pattern, with acute perioperative worsening followed by recovery by 3 months for most patients.

Patient-reported outcomes have become standard in facial skin cancer surgery, yet clinicians currently lack validated tools to predict postoperative appearance satisfaction from preoperative patient characteristics. We developed and internally validated a prediction model for appearance satisfaction three months after facial skin cancer reconstruction. A prospective cohort study enrolled 287 patients at a tertiary referral center (2017-2018); 111 patients with complete data were included in the primary analysis. Patients completed the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module preoperatively and at three months postoperatively. Our multivariable linear regression model incorporated age, sex, comorbidities, smoking status, and baseline appearance satisfaction. The model explained 23.0% of variance in postoperative appearance satisfaction (R2 = 0.23; adjusted R2 = 0.19; p < 0.001). Baseline appearance satisfaction (B = 0.48; 95% CI 0.28-0.68; p < 0.001) and female sex (B = -7.16; 95% CI -12.52 to -1.81; p = 0.009) emerged as independent predictors. Bootstrap resampling (500 iterations) yielded an optimism-corrected R2 of 0.17, supporting acceptable internal validity. Mean appearance satisfaction remained stable from baseline (54.8 +/- 13.8) to three months (57.0 +/- 16.4; p = 0.27). Baseline appearance satisfaction and female sex independently predict postoperative appearance satisfaction following facial skin cancer reconstruction. External validation in independent cohorts is warranted before clinical implementation.

ObjectiveUnlike several other fields of healthcare, little is known about the size of therapist effects on patient outcomes following rehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions. We aimed to estimate the proportion of variance in patient outcomes from a structured rehabilitation program explained by therapist effects. MethodsFor our observational cohort study we accessed data from the national multicentre Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D) osteoarthritis management program. Analyses included 23,021 consecutive eligible adults with hip or knee osteoarthritis (mean (SD) age 65.0 (9.8) years, 71% female) treated by 657 therapists between October 2014 and February 2019. The primary outcome was [&ge;]30% reduction in pain intensity on 0-100 VAS at 3 months. Therapist effects were estimated as the variance partition coefficient (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)) from two-level random intercept logistic regression models before and after adjusting for patient-level case-mix factors and therapist-level characteristics (number of patients treated, days since therapist certification). Analyses were repeated for a range of secondary outcomes using multiply imputed data and complete-case analysis. Results52% of patients reported a [&ge;]30% reduction in pain intensity on 0-100 VAS at 3 months. In the null model the ICC was 0.007 (95%CI: 0.005, 0.009), which changed little after adjusting for patient- and therapist-level covariates. Upper confidence limits for ICC estimates across all secondary outcomes in multiply imputed and complete case analyses were less than 0.03. ConclusionsIn a nationally implemented osteoarthritis management program delivered by trained healthcare professionals, therapist effects made a minimal contribution to variation in patient outcomes. KEY MESSAGESO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABS Therapist effects - defined as the effect of a given therapist on patient outcomes as compared to another therapist - have been observed in several fields of healthcare and have important consequences for selection, training, and service improvement. In musculoskeletal rehabilitation five previous studies suggest that 1-12% of variation in patient-reported outcomes may be attributable to therapist effects, but these estimates were based on relatively small datasets resulting in substantial uncertainty. What this study addsOur cohort study analysed registry data from 2014-2019 on 23,021 patients and 647 trained therapists from the nationally implemented GLA:D structured osteoarthritis management program in Denmark. We found that therapist effects accounted for less than 3% of total variation in patient-reported pain and quality of life outcomes 3 months after beginning the program How this study might affect research, practice, or policyOur findings suggest that contextual factors that relate to therapist effects - therapist characteristics or therapist-patient interaction and alliance - make a minimal contribution to variation in patient outcomes from this structured, group-based rehabilitation intervention. Any contextual effects must be attributable to alternative sources, e.g. patient expectations, intervention setting.

Background As part of Singapore's effort towards precision medicine tailored to Asian diversity, we describe the implementation of a nationwide reproductive carrier screening program. Using a customised 112-gene panel, incorporating population-specific recessive genetic diseases, we outline the overall program design, and initial efforts of community and stakeholder engagement, to inform culturally appropriate implementation. Methods Participants receive culturally tailored online education regarding our reproductive screening program and are provided results with genetic counselling and reproductive options. Community and stakeholder perspectives were assessed through questionnaires and consultations with religious leaders. Results Recruitment is nation-wide, and since initiation of our pilot phase in September 2024, 1,619 couples have registered interest, with 60% uptake of those deemed eligible. Among the 456 couples that have received results to date, four couples (0.9%) were identified to be at increased risk. Community questionnaire responses (n=1002), involving couples who participated in the program as well as the general public, indicated interest is high (59%) across the cohort but awareness, intent to participate and implications for reproductive options differed by sociodemographic factors such as ancestry and religion. Healthcare professional respondents (n=113) acknowledged carrier screening will be routine in medical care, but report limited confidence and resources. Engagement with religious leaders indicated support for the program. Conclusion These early program outcomes and community engagement are guiding the implementation of expanding population-based carrier screening in Singapore, contingent on addressing practical challenges through equitable outreach and professional training.

Background Trials in occupational populations, such as surgeons, face feasibility challenges due to high workload, restricted availability, and clinical heterogeneity, which may compromise recruitment, adherence, and retention. Objective To prespecify the feasibility framework and progression criteria for an internal pilot phase embedded within a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy with generalized exercise in surgeons with chronic spinal pain. Design Protocol for a prespecified internal pilot phase embedded within a pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group RCT. Methods The internal pilot will include the first four months of recruitment and aims to randomize at least 12 participants. Feasibility will be assessed across predefined domains, i.e., recruitment, eligibility, consent, intervention uptake, adherence, retention, data completeness, and treatment fidelity. Each domain is operationally defined and linked to prespecified progression criteria to ensure interpretability and decision-making utility. Criteria will be interpreted collectively to guide trial continuation. A minimal qualitative process evaluation will be embedded. Ethics and dissemination The host trial has received ethical approval (N-20240046) and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07293130). The findings from the internal pilot will be reported in a separate feasibility manuscript.

Background In clinical trials for alopecia areata (AA) the treatment effect (percentage of hair loss) is estimated using the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score. Trials in patients with severe AA (>=50% hair loss) employed a local rating of the SALT score performed at trial sites by different investigators. However, in mild-to-moderate AA (<= 50% hair loss) where SALT scores are lower, potential inter rater variability and margin of error may compromise the results. Objectives To compare Centralised and Local measurement of hair loss in mild moderate AA. Methods In a Phase 2 clinical trial a centralised measurement of hair loss was performed from photographic images taken using a standardised protocol and professional camera equipment. Local scoring was also undertaken at screening/baseline for eligibility. We assessed: the repeatability of the central system (screening vs baseline values), the reproducibility of the central versus the local rating system and the potential impact of each method on the endpoints using a Monte-Carlo simulation method. Results There was good agreement and consistency of scoring with Central rating. This provided much smaller margins of error, 50% lower than Local rating. The simulations demonstrated that substituting Local rating for Central rating would result in a reduction of the likelihood of a statistically significant outcome by at least 50% depending on the SALT score defined clinical response endpoint. Conclusions Central rating is most appropriate in the Phase 2 learning stage of clinical development and provides an accurate representation of the quantity of hair loss, minimising error and ensuring consistency in measurements.

Background Plasma gelsolin (pGSN) is a non-immunosuppressive anti-inflammatory immunomodulator with demonstrated efficacy in animal models of acute lung injury. Its potential role in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is currently under investigation. Methods We conducted a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of recombinant human pGSN (rhu-pGSN) following intravenous (IV) administration to healthy volunteers. Thirty-two participants were assigned to 4 sequentially ascending dose cohorts (6, 12, 18, 24 mg/kg of body weight) to receive five IV infusions of rhu-pGSN or saline placebo. Each cohort includes 8 subjects randomized 3:1 with rhu-pGSN or placebo. Doses were administered at 0 hours, 12 hours, 36 hours, 60 hours, and 84 hours. The primary outcome is the incidence and severity of clinical and laboratory AEs regardless of causality. Secondary outcomes include the pharmacokinetics of IV rhu-pGSN and the presence of anti-rhu-pGSN antibodies at Day 28. Results Overall, 10 subjects (41.7%) who received rhu-pGSN reported a total of 13 adverse events (AEs), and 1 subject (12.5%) who received placebo reported an AE. All AEs were mild or moderate. AEs in system organ classes that were reported by 2 or more subjects in either arm were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (12.5% rhu-pGSN; 0% placebo), gastrointestinal disorders (8.3% rhu-pGSN; 0% placebo), and nervous system disorders (12.5% rhu-pGSN; 12.5% placebo). No AEs by preferred term were reported by more than 1 subject in either arm. Three subjects (12.5%) experienced an AE assessed as related to study drug. No serious AEs occurred, and no AEs led to study discontinuation, dose interruption/reduction, or death. There were no apparent between-treatment differences in laboratory abnormalities, vital signs, or electrocardiogram findings. Conclusions Overall, in this study, IV rhu-pGSN (up to 24 mg/kg daily) appeared safe and well tolerated compared to placebo. The median half-life of rhu-pGSN exceeded 14 h across all dosing regimens, supporting once daily IV dosing in healthy subjects. Trial registration This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 2023-03-29 under the registration identifier NCT05789745.

BackgroundNicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) and nicotinamide riboside (NR) are NAD+ precursor supplements widely marketed for metabolic health benefits. Despite billions of dollars in annual sales, no head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared their effects on metabolic endpoints, and no systematic characterization of why reliable comparison is currently impossible has been published. ObjectiveTo characterize the structural heterogeneity of the NMN and NR trial evidence bases across population, dose, duration, and biomarker dimensions; to formally assess transitivity; and to estimate indirect NMN versus NR effects where methodologically feasible using the Bucher indirect comparison method. MethodsFive databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched from January 2018 to May 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs of oral NMN or NR versus placebo in adults reporting metabolic outcomes. A formal transitivity assessment was conducted comparing effect modifier distributions across NMN and NR trial arms. Random-effects pairwise meta-analyses were conducted for each precursor versus placebo, and Bucher indirect comparisons estimated NMN versus NR effects through the common placebo node. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and certainty of evidence using the GRADE/CINeMA framework. ResultsFifteen studies (5 NMN, 10 NR; 740 participants) were included. The NMN and NR trial evidence bases were systematically asymmetric across every major effect modifier: NR was dosed 1.9 to 9.2 times higher than NMN on a molar basis; NMN trials were conducted predominantly in East Asian populations while NR trials were predominantly Western; and available NAD+ pharmacodynamic measures used incompatible assay matrices precluding indirect comparison. Across 14 metabolically comparable outcomes, no indirect comparison reached statistical significance and all were rated Very Low certainty by GRADE/CINeMA, consistent with the structural limitations of the evidence base. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses showed zero pairwise significance changes and one indirect significance change (triglycerides upon exclusion of Conze 2019). ConclusionCurrent evidence is structurally insufficient to support reliable indirect comparison of NMN and NR for metabolic outcomes. The barriers are quantifiable and modifiable: future head-to-head trials should use equimolar dosing (approximately 1,150 mg NMN is molar-equivalent to 1,000 mg NR), harmonized whole-blood NAD+ assays reported in mol/L, minimum 24 weeks duration, and enrollment of metabolically at-risk populations to generate interpretable comparative evidence. RegistrationPROSPERO 2026 CRD420261330487; registered prior to data screening.

ObjectivesEpidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an emerging therapy for motor rehabilitation following spinal cord injury (SCI) and other motor disorders. Conventionally, SCS leads are placed along the dorsal spinal cord (SCSD), where stimulation activates large diameter afferent fibers, which indirectly activate motoneurons through reflex pathways. This leads to broad activation of flexor and extensor muscles and limited fine-tuned control of motor output. Targeting the ventral spinal cord (SCSV) may enable more direct activation of motoneuron pools, potentially improving the specificity of muscle activation; however, there is currently no established method to place leads ventrally. To address this, we evaluated the feasibility of four modified percutaneous implantation techniques to target the ventrolateral thoracolumbar spinal cord. Materials and methodsPercutaneous SCSV implantation was performed in three human cadaver torso specimens under fluoroscopic guidance. The following approaches were evaluated: sacral hiatus, transforaminal, interlaminar contralateral, and interlaminar ipsilateral. The leads in the latter 3 approaches were inserted between L1 and L5. Eighteen implants were attempted, with nine leads retained for analysis. Lead and electrode position were assessed using computed tomography (CT) with three-dimensional reconstruction, along with anatomical dissection to verify lead and electrode placement within the epidural space. ResultsSuccessful ventral epidural lead placement was achieved using all four implantation approaches. The sacral hiatus (16/16 electrodes) and transforaminal (8/8 electrodes) approaches resulted in exclusively ventrolateral placement. The interlaminar contralateral approach led to 27/32 electrodes positioned ventrolaterally and 5/32 dorsally. The interlaminar ipsilateral implantation approach led to 14/32 electrodes positioned ventrolaterally and 18/32 positioned ventromedially. ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that ventral epidural SCS lead placement can be achieved using modified percutaneous implant techniques. The four approaches outlined here provide a clinically feasible pathway to SCSV and establishes a foundation for future clinical studies investigating SCSV for motor rehabilitation following SCI.

BackgroundLasers have wide applications in medicine and dermatology, but are associated with pain and anxiety, particularly in younger patients. Pain mitigation is often limited to topical anesthetics in the outpatient setting. Distraction techniques are limited by the need for ocular protection, which can include adhesive eye patches that can completely occlude vision. Virtual reality is effective at managing procedural pain and anxiety under other short medical procedures and is a promising tool for this population. ObjectiveThis trial aims to assess the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of Virtual Reality Pain Alleviation Therapeutic (VR-PAT) for pain management during outpatient laser procedures. Methods40 patients requiring outpatient laser therapy for at least two sessions will be recruited from a pediatric hospital in the midwestern United States for this crossover randomized, two-arm clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. During the first laser visit, the participant will be randomly assigned to either play the VR-PAT game during their procedure or wear the headset with a dark screen. Participants will answer questions about their pain (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10), anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children, NRS 0-10, Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS)), and pain medication usage. Those playing the VR-PAT will additionally report simulator sickness symptoms and their experience playing the game. At their second laser visit, participants will crossover to the opposite intervention from their first visit. The primary outcomes are the difference in self-reported pain and anxiety between the two interventions. Feasibility outcomes include the proportion of screened patients who are eligible, consent, and complete both visits and adverse events reported. To evaluate the efficacy of pain reduction, composite scores of pain score, pain medication will be calculated for each laser visit. To evaluate the efficacy of anxiety reduction, the change of mYPAS scores will be compared between control and VR groups at each visit using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. All statistical analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle in regard to intervention assignment at each visit. ResultsThe study was funded in January 2023 and began enrollment at that time. A total of n=44 participants were recruited and data collection was completed in November 2025, with n=40 subjects completing both visits. The sample was balanced with n=40 subjects using the intervention and participating in the control condition. The age range of the complete sample was 6 to 21 years at recruitment and was 55% female sex. Data analysis is in progress with final results planned for June 2026. ConclusionsFindings from this innovative randomized clinical trial will provide early evidence on the efficacy of the VR-PAT for reducing self-reported pain and anxiety during outpatient laser procedures. The results from this trial will inform a large-scale, multisite study. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05645224 [https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05645224]

Background Individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness face substantial barriers to preventive eye care that are poorly addressed by standard service models. Interdisciplinary optometry-social work collaboration offers a rights-based approach to improving engagement and continuity of care. Methods A convergent mixed-methods study was conducted between February and August 2024 at a multidisciplinary community centre. Clients experiencing or at risk of homelessness received integrated optometry and social work assessment and were prioritised as high, medium, or low based on combined clinical and social risk. Social work follow-up was guided by the Triple Mandate and W-Questions framework. Quantitative data were summarised using mean (SD), median [IQR], or n (%). Qualitative case notes were analysed using content analysis with inductive coding and secondary review for consistency. Results A total of 165 clients had priority categories coded (high: 68; medium: 47; low: 154). Demographic data were available for 132 clients (60% male; mean age 49.5 years [SD 16]); 27% had not completed high school, 89% reported weekly income below AUD 1000, and 28% had vision impairment. Two hundred forty-five case-note entries were consolidated into 146 unique records. SMS (46%) and phone calls (38%) were the most documented contact methods, although only 21% of calls were answered; missed calls (13%) and disconnected numbers (7%) were common. Multi-modal contact was more frequently documented for higher-priority clients. Appointment assistance was the most recorded facilitator (71%), while rights-based supports, including interpreter and transport assistance, were infrequently documented (<=5%). Qualitative analysis identified unstable communication, reliance on informal supports, and service fragmentation as key influences on recall outcomes. Conclusion This study supports an interdisciplinary, rights-based optometry-social work model to address barriers to preventive eye care among people experiencing or at risk of homelessness. Embedding structured handovers and tiered recall processes within community-based services may strengthen continuity and accountability for high-priority clients. Future implementation should evaluate outcomes related to equity of reach, service integration, and sustained engagement in care.

Background: Peak height velocity (PHV) is a critical indicator of pubertal growth timing and is widely used in orthodontics to determine optimal timing for growth modification interventions. Secular trends toward earlier maturation have been reported, but a quantitative synthesis of PHV age reduction across generations is lacking. Objective: To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize evidence for secular trends in age at PHV and to estimate the pooled mean difference in PHV age between historical and contemporary cohorts. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar from January 1990 to December 2021. The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) was also searched but yielded no eligible studies due to the specificity of the search string. Studies were included if they reported age at PHV in two or more birth cohorts separated by at least 20 years, used objective methods to determine PHV (longitudinal growth data with curve fitting), and reported means with standard deviations or standard errors. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects quantitative synthesis (meta-analytic approach) was performed to calculate the pooled mean difference in PHV age between historical and contemporary cohorts. Between-study variance (tau-squared) was estimated using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method. Heterogeneity was assessed using I-squared statistics. Given the limited number of eligible studies, findings should be interpreted as preliminary. Results: Two high-quality longitudinal studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 171 participants from historical cohorts (1969-1973) and 71 participants from contemporary cohorts (1996-2000). The pooled mean difference in PHV age was -0.48 years (95% CI: -0.72 to -0.24, P < 0.001), indicating that contemporary children reach PHV approximately 0.5 years earlier than their historical counterparts. PHV velocity showed a pooled increase of 0.71 cm/year (95% CI: 0.48 to 0.94, P < 0.001). Heterogeneity was low (I-squared = 0% for both analyses). Both studies were rated as low risk of bias. These findings are based on a limited number of studies and should be interpreted as preliminary. Conclusions: This preliminary quantitative synthesis provides evidence of a secular decline in age at peak height velocity of approximately 0.5 years in contemporary children compared to historical cohorts, accompanied by an increase in growth velocity. These findings suggest that orthodontic growth modification strategies may need to be initiated earlier than traditionally recommended. However, given the limited evidence base, results should be interpreted with caution and require confirmation in large-scale longitudinal studies.