Back

A Modified Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Implant Approach to Target the Ventral Spinal Cord

Valestrino, K. J.; Ihediwa, C. V.; Dorius, G. T.; Conger, A. M.; Glinka-Przybysz, A.; McCormick, Z. L.; Fogarty, A. E.; Mahan, M. A.; Hernandez-Bello, J.; Konrad, P. E.; Burnham, T. R.; Dalrymple, A. N.

2026-04-13 surgery
10.64898/2026.04.06.26350176 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesEpidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an emerging therapy for motor rehabilitation following spinal cord injury (SCI) and other motor disorders. Conventionally, SCS leads are placed along the dorsal spinal cord (SCSD), where stimulation activates large diameter afferent fibers, which indirectly activate motoneurons through reflex pathways. This leads to broad activation of flexor and extensor muscles and limited fine-tuned control of motor output. Targeting the ventral spinal cord (SCSV) may enable more direct activation of motoneuron pools, potentially improving the specificity of muscle activation; however, there is currently no established method to place leads ventrally. To address this, we evaluated the feasibility of four modified percutaneous implantation techniques to target the ventrolateral thoracolumbar spinal cord. Materials and methodsPercutaneous SCSV implantation was performed in three human cadaver torso specimens under fluoroscopic guidance. The following approaches were evaluated: sacral hiatus, transforaminal, interlaminar contralateral, and interlaminar ipsilateral. The leads in the latter 3 approaches were inserted between L1 and L5. Eighteen implants were attempted, with nine leads retained for analysis. Lead and electrode position were assessed using computed tomography (CT) with three-dimensional reconstruction, along with anatomical dissection to verify lead and electrode placement within the epidural space. ResultsSuccessful ventral epidural lead placement was achieved using all four implantation approaches. The sacral hiatus (16/16 electrodes) and transforaminal (8/8 electrodes) approaches resulted in exclusively ventrolateral placement. The interlaminar contralateral approach led to 27/32 electrodes positioned ventrolaterally and 5/32 dorsally. The interlaminar ipsilateral implantation approach led to 14/32 electrodes positioned ventrolaterally and 18/32 positioned ventromedially. ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that ventral epidural SCS lead placement can be achieved using modified percutaneous implant techniques. The four approaches outlined here provide a clinically feasible pathway to SCSV and establishes a foundation for future clinical studies investigating SCSV for motor rehabilitation following SCI.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.8%
2
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
3
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
4
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.6%
5
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
8
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
9
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
10
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
11
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%