A Modified Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Implant Approach to Target the Ventral Spinal Cord
Valestrino, K. J.; Ihediwa, C. V.; Dorius, G. T.; Conger, A. M.; Glinka-Przybysz, A.; McCormick, Z. L.; Fogarty, A. E.; Mahan, M. A.; Hernandez-Bello, J.; Konrad, P. E.; Burnham, T. R.; Dalrymple, A. N.
Show abstract
ObjectivesEpidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an emerging therapy for motor rehabilitation following spinal cord injury (SCI) and other motor disorders. Conventionally, SCS leads are placed along the dorsal spinal cord (SCSD), where stimulation activates large diameter afferent fibers, which indirectly activate motoneurons through reflex pathways. This leads to broad activation of flexor and extensor muscles and limited fine-tuned control of motor output. Targeting the ventral spinal cord (SCSV) may enable more direct activation of motoneuron pools, potentially improving the specificity of muscle activation; however, there is currently no established method to place leads ventrally. To address this, we evaluated the feasibility of four modified percutaneous implantation techniques to target the ventrolateral thoracolumbar spinal cord. Materials and methodsPercutaneous SCSV implantation was performed in three human cadaver torso specimens under fluoroscopic guidance. The following approaches were evaluated: sacral hiatus, transforaminal, interlaminar contralateral, and interlaminar ipsilateral. The leads in the latter 3 approaches were inserted between L1 and L5. Eighteen implants were attempted, with nine leads retained for analysis. Lead and electrode position were assessed using computed tomography (CT) with three-dimensional reconstruction, along with anatomical dissection to verify lead and electrode placement within the epidural space. ResultsSuccessful ventral epidural lead placement was achieved using all four implantation approaches. The sacral hiatus (16/16 electrodes) and transforaminal (8/8 electrodes) approaches resulted in exclusively ventrolateral placement. The interlaminar contralateral approach led to 27/32 electrodes positioned ventrolaterally and 5/32 dorsally. The interlaminar ipsilateral implantation approach led to 14/32 electrodes positioned ventrolaterally and 18/32 positioned ventromedially. ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that ventral epidural SCS lead placement can be achieved using modified percutaneous implant techniques. The four approaches outlined here provide a clinically feasible pathway to SCSV and establishes a foundation for future clinical studies investigating SCSV for motor rehabilitation following SCI.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.