Back

Predicting Patient-Reported Appearance Satisfaction After Facial Skin Cancer Reconstruction: Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prediction Model

Ottenhof, M. M. J.

2026-04-03 surgery
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349978 medRxiv
Show abstract

Patient-reported outcomes have become standard in facial skin cancer surgery, yet clinicians currently lack validated tools to predict postoperative appearance satisfaction from preoperative patient characteristics. We developed and internally validated a prediction model for appearance satisfaction three months after facial skin cancer reconstruction. A prospective cohort study enrolled 287 patients at a tertiary referral center (2017-2018); 111 patients with complete data were included in the primary analysis. Patients completed the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module preoperatively and at three months postoperatively. Our multivariable linear regression model incorporated age, sex, comorbidities, smoking status, and baseline appearance satisfaction. The model explained 23.0% of variance in postoperative appearance satisfaction (R2 = 0.23; adjusted R2 = 0.19; p < 0.001). Baseline appearance satisfaction (B = 0.48; 95% CI 0.28-0.68; p < 0.001) and female sex (B = -7.16; 95% CI -12.52 to -1.81; p = 0.009) emerged as independent predictors. Bootstrap resampling (500 iterations) yielded an optimism-corrected R2 of 0.17, supporting acceptable internal validity. Mean appearance satisfaction remained stable from baseline (54.8 +/- 13.8) to three months (57.0 +/- 16.4; p = 0.27). Baseline appearance satisfaction and female sex independently predict postoperative appearance satisfaction following facial skin cancer reconstruction. External validation in independent cohorts is warranted before clinical implementation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.