Predicting Patient-Reported Appearance Satisfaction After Facial Skin Cancer Reconstruction: Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prediction Model
Ottenhof, M. M. J.
Show abstract
Patient-reported outcomes have become standard in facial skin cancer surgery, yet clinicians currently lack validated tools to predict postoperative appearance satisfaction from preoperative patient characteristics. We developed and internally validated a prediction model for appearance satisfaction three months after facial skin cancer reconstruction. A prospective cohort study enrolled 287 patients at a tertiary referral center (2017-2018); 111 patients with complete data were included in the primary analysis. Patients completed the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module preoperatively and at three months postoperatively. Our multivariable linear regression model incorporated age, sex, comorbidities, smoking status, and baseline appearance satisfaction. The model explained 23.0% of variance in postoperative appearance satisfaction (R2 = 0.23; adjusted R2 = 0.19; p < 0.001). Baseline appearance satisfaction (B = 0.48; 95% CI 0.28-0.68; p < 0.001) and female sex (B = -7.16; 95% CI -12.52 to -1.81; p = 0.009) emerged as independent predictors. Bootstrap resampling (500 iterations) yielded an optimism-corrected R2 of 0.17, supporting acceptable internal validity. Mean appearance satisfaction remained stable from baseline (54.8 +/- 13.8) to three months (57.0 +/- 16.4; p = 0.27). Baseline appearance satisfaction and female sex independently predict postoperative appearance satisfaction following facial skin cancer reconstruction. External validation in independent cohorts is warranted before clinical implementation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre- and post-operative psychological interventions to prevent pain and fatigue after breast cancer surgery (PREVENT): a randomized controlled trial 92%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 90%
- Evaluation of the efficacy of using indocyanine green associated with fluorescence in sentinel lymph node biopsy 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Radiation of pain: Psychophysical evidence for a population coding mechanism in humans 87%
- Convergent validity of a person-dependent definition of a low back pain flare 87%
- The Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Negative Allosteric Modulator Fenobam: Pharmacokinetics, Side Effects, and Analgesic Effects in Healthy Human Subjects. 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of a natural disaster on access to care and biopsychosocial outcomes among Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors 91%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 89%
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Guided relaxation-based virtual reality versus distraction-based virtual reality or passive control for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (FOREVR Peds trial) 90%
- Psychological Impact of the Galleri Test (sIG(n)al): Protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri Trial 89%
- Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of pre and postoperative nutritional supplementation in major lung surgery 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK 91%
- Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy: Considerations from an OBGYN Perspective 90%
- Updated Results of 3,050 Non-melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) Lesions in 1725 Patients Treated with High Resolution Dermal Ultrasound-Guided Superficial Radiotherapy, A Multi-institutional Study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.