Back

A rights-based intervention integrating social work and ophthalmic care for people experiencing or at risk of homelessness

Hassani, A.; Pecar, K.; Soliman, M.; Bunyon, P.; Ellinger, C.; Tulysewskid, G.; Croft, J.; Carillo, C.; Wewegama, G.; du Plessis-Schneider, S.; Estevez, J. J.

2026-04-24 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351525 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness face substantial barriers to preventive eye care that are poorly addressed by standard service models. Interdisciplinary optometry-social work collaboration offers a rights-based approach to improving engagement and continuity of care. Methods A convergent mixed-methods study was conducted between February and August 2024 at a multidisciplinary community centre. Clients experiencing or at risk of homelessness received integrated optometry and social work assessment and were prioritised as high, medium, or low based on combined clinical and social risk. Social work follow-up was guided by the Triple Mandate and W-Questions framework. Quantitative data were summarised using mean (SD), median [IQR], or n (%). Qualitative case notes were analysed using content analysis with inductive coding and secondary review for consistency. Results A total of 165 clients had priority categories coded (high: 68; medium: 47; low: 154). Demographic data were available for 132 clients (60% male; mean age 49.5 years [SD 16]); 27% had not completed high school, 89% reported weekly income below AUD 1000, and 28% had vision impairment. Two hundred forty-five case-note entries were consolidated into 146 unique records. SMS (46%) and phone calls (38%) were the most documented contact methods, although only 21% of calls were answered; missed calls (13%) and disconnected numbers (7%) were common. Multi-modal contact was more frequently documented for higher-priority clients. Appointment assistance was the most recorded facilitator (71%), while rights-based supports, including interpreter and transport assistance, were infrequently documented (<=5%). Qualitative analysis identified unstable communication, reliance on informal supports, and service fragmentation as key influences on recall outcomes. Conclusion This study supports an interdisciplinary, rights-based optometry-social work model to address barriers to preventive eye care among people experiencing or at risk of homelessness. Embedding structured handovers and tiered recall processes within community-based services may strengthen continuity and accountability for high-priority clients. Future implementation should evaluate outcomes related to equity of reach, service integration, and sustained engagement in care.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
3
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
4
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
8
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
21
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
23
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
24
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
27
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
28
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%