Back

Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Facial Skin Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Longitudinal Study Using the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module

Ottenhof, M. M. J.; Hoogbergen, M. M.; van der Hulst, R. R. W. J.

2026-04-06 surgery
10.64898/2026.04.06.26349979 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures provide essential data on treatment quality across diverse populations. The FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module was developed to assess outcomes specific to facial skin cancer patients. Longitudinal data characterizing outcome trajectories from surgery through early recovery remain limited. Objective: We tracked how patient outcomes change from preoperatively through three months after surgery using the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module in a prospective cohort of 288 patients undergoing facial skin cancer surgery. Methods: Participants completed the module preoperatively and at 1 week and 3 months postoperatively. Five scales were evaluated: Appearance, Psychosocial Distress, Cancer Worry, Scars, and Adverse Effects. Friedman tests assessed overall change across timepoints; paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests evaluated pairwise comparisons. Results: Of 288 enrolled patients (mean age 68.6+/-11.9 years, 46.5% female), 252 (87.5%) and 220 (76.4%) completed 1-week and 3-month follow-up, respectively. Facial appearance declined at 1 week (55.6 to 52.0, p=0.005) and returned to baseline by 3 months (57.0, p=0.274). Psychosocial distress increased acutely (14.5 to 19.0, p<0.001) with partial recovery at 3 months (17.1, p=0.012). Cancer worry decreased substantially (delta=-7.8, SRM=-0.54, p<0.001), and scar satisfaction improved from 1 week to 3 months (delta=+9.4, SRM=0.54, p<0.001). Adverse effects showed the largest improvement (delta=-12.8, SRM=-0.88, p<0.001). Women showed less improvement in facial appearance than men (delta=-2.2 vs +4.9, p=0.022). Clinical meaningfulness was assessed using minimally important difference thresholds: 36.9% of patients achieved meaningful improvement in appearance, 39.6% remained stable, and 23.4% experienced meaningful deterioration. Conclusions: Short-term outcomes follow a predictable pattern, with acute perioperative worsening followed by recovery by 3 months for most patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.8%
2
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
10
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
11
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
19
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
21
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
22
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%