Pilot Feasibility Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality for Pain Management During Repeated Pediatric Laser Procedures: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial
Armstrong, M.; Williams, H.; Fernandez Faith, E.; Ni, A.; Xiang, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundLasers have wide applications in medicine and dermatology, but are associated with pain and anxiety, particularly in younger patients. Pain mitigation is often limited to topical anesthetics in the outpatient setting. Distraction techniques are limited by the need for ocular protection, which can include adhesive eye patches that can completely occlude vision. Virtual reality is effective at managing procedural pain and anxiety under other short medical procedures and is a promising tool for this population. ObjectiveThis trial aims to assess the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of Virtual Reality Pain Alleviation Therapeutic (VR-PAT) for pain management during outpatient laser procedures. Methods40 patients requiring outpatient laser therapy for at least two sessions will be recruited from a pediatric hospital in the midwestern United States for this crossover randomized, two-arm clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. During the first laser visit, the participant will be randomly assigned to either play the VR-PAT game during their procedure or wear the headset with a dark screen. Participants will answer questions about their pain (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10), anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children, NRS 0-10, Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS)), and pain medication usage. Those playing the VR-PAT will additionally report simulator sickness symptoms and their experience playing the game. At their second laser visit, participants will crossover to the opposite intervention from their first visit. The primary outcomes are the difference in self-reported pain and anxiety between the two interventions. Feasibility outcomes include the proportion of screened patients who are eligible, consent, and complete both visits and adverse events reported. To evaluate the efficacy of pain reduction, composite scores of pain score, pain medication will be calculated for each laser visit. To evaluate the efficacy of anxiety reduction, the change of mYPAS scores will be compared between control and VR groups at each visit using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. All statistical analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle in regard to intervention assignment at each visit. ResultsThe study was funded in January 2023 and began enrollment at that time. A total of n=44 participants were recruited and data collection was completed in November 2025, with n=40 subjects completing both visits. The sample was balanced with n=40 subjects using the intervention and participating in the control condition. The age range of the complete sample was 6 to 21 years at recruitment and was 55% female sex. Data analysis is in progress with final results planned for June 2026. ConclusionsFindings from this innovative randomized clinical trial will provide early evidence on the efficacy of the VR-PAT for reducing self-reported pain and anxiety during outpatient laser procedures. The results from this trial will inform a large-scale, multisite study. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05645224 [https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05645224]
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 94%
- Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: the V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol 93%
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Human Skin Wound Healing and Rejuvenation Following Ablative Fractional Laser Treatment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Face mask use in the Community for Reducing the Spread of COVID-19: a systematic review 92%
- Modified Preparation Method of Ideal Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) from Whole Blood 91%
- Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial to study co-administration of Ashwagandha on safety, immunogenicity, and protection with COVID-19 vaccine – A Study Protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Guided relaxation-based virtual reality versus distraction-based virtual reality or passive control for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (FOREVR Peds trial) 94%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 93%
- Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for myopia among urban and rural children in southern China: protocol for a school-based cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elastomeric Harnesses Decrease Aerosol Particles Leak and Improve the Fit of Surgical Masks 92%
- Estimating the Per-Application Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Mupirocin in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization in Intensive Care Units 90%
- Pain management after dental extractions – non-opioid combination analgesics minimize opioid use for acute dental pain 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.