Back

Pilot Feasibility Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality for Pain Management During Repeated Pediatric Laser Procedures: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

Armstrong, M.; Williams, H.; Fernandez Faith, E.; Ni, A.; Xiang, H.

2026-04-22 dermatology
10.64898/2026.04.21.26351381 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLasers have wide applications in medicine and dermatology, but are associated with pain and anxiety, particularly in younger patients. Pain mitigation is often limited to topical anesthetics in the outpatient setting. Distraction techniques are limited by the need for ocular protection, which can include adhesive eye patches that can completely occlude vision. Virtual reality is effective at managing procedural pain and anxiety under other short medical procedures and is a promising tool for this population. ObjectiveThis trial aims to assess the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of Virtual Reality Pain Alleviation Therapeutic (VR-PAT) for pain management during outpatient laser procedures. Methods40 patients requiring outpatient laser therapy for at least two sessions will be recruited from a pediatric hospital in the midwestern United States for this crossover randomized, two-arm clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. During the first laser visit, the participant will be randomly assigned to either play the VR-PAT game during their procedure or wear the headset with a dark screen. Participants will answer questions about their pain (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10), anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children, NRS 0-10, Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS)), and pain medication usage. Those playing the VR-PAT will additionally report simulator sickness symptoms and their experience playing the game. At their second laser visit, participants will crossover to the opposite intervention from their first visit. The primary outcomes are the difference in self-reported pain and anxiety between the two interventions. Feasibility outcomes include the proportion of screened patients who are eligible, consent, and complete both visits and adverse events reported. To evaluate the efficacy of pain reduction, composite scores of pain score, pain medication will be calculated for each laser visit. To evaluate the efficacy of anxiety reduction, the change of mYPAS scores will be compared between control and VR groups at each visit using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. All statistical analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle in regard to intervention assignment at each visit. ResultsThe study was funded in January 2023 and began enrollment at that time. A total of n=44 participants were recruited and data collection was completed in November 2025, with n=40 subjects completing both visits. The sample was balanced with n=40 subjects using the intervention and participating in the control condition. The age range of the complete sample was 6 to 21 years at recruitment and was 55% female sex. Data analysis is in progress with final results planned for June 2026. ConclusionsFindings from this innovative randomized clinical trial will provide early evidence on the efficacy of the VR-PAT for reducing self-reported pain and anxiety during outpatient laser procedures. The results from this trial will inform a large-scale, multisite study. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05645224 [https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05645224]

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.2%
2
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
3
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
4
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
5
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.5%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
10
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
15
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%