Back

Predicting Musculoskeletal Adverse Events During Moderate- to High-Intensity Walking Training in Chronic Stroke

Pressler, D.; Schwab-Farrell, S. M.; Awosika, O. O.; Reisman, D. S.; Billinger, S. A.; Riley, M. A.; Boyne, P.; On behalf of the HIT-Stroke Trial investigators,

2026-04-18 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.04.16.26351040 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Moderate- to high-intensity walking training (M-HIT) is an established intervention for improving walking capacity in chronic stroke. Musculoskeletal (MSK) adverse events commonly occur during M-HIT, yet tools to identify individuals at higher risk are limited. Baseline clinical characteristics may provide insight into susceptibility to training-related MSK adverse events during M-HIT. Thus, this study aimed to develop and internally validate a model for predicting MSK adverse events during a 12-week M-HIT program in chronic stroke using baseline clinical characteristics. Methods: Participants (n=100) from HIT-Stroke Trials 1 and 2 were included. Baseline clinical characteristics included measures of orthopedic history, pre-existing pain, motor function, recent exercise history, demographics and health characteristics, stroke chronicity, and psychological health. Logistic regression models evaluated all possible combinations of baseline characteristics with up to three predictors. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used for internal validation to mitigate overfitting. Predictive performance was quantified using the C-statistic, and the candidate model with the highest cross-validated C-statistic was selected as the final model. Results: MSK adverse events occurred in 32.0% of participants. The optimal three-variable model included prior orthopedic condition (Odds ratio [OR] 3.02 [95% CI 1.14-8.64]), Fugl-Meyer lower extremity motor score (OR 1.14 [95% CI 1.02-1.28]), and self-reported participation in regular walking exercise (OR 0.17 [95% CI 0.05-0.49]) at baseline. This model demonstrated moderate discrimination (cross-validated C-statistic = 0.74; apparent C-statistic = 0.78). Conclusions: Participants reporting at least one pre-existing lower extremity or lumbar spine orthopedic condition and those with better lower-extremity motor function exhibited greater odds of experiencing MSK adverse events during M-HIT, while participants reporting participation in regular walking exercise had lower odds. These findings suggest that baseline clinical characteristics may help identify individuals at elevated risk for MSK adverse events during M-HIT who may warrant closer monitoring or risk-reduction strategies. Future studies are needed for external validation. Clinical Trial Registration: https://ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT03760016, NCT06268041

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.9%
2
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
7
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
14
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
20
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
26
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%