Bioengineering

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been rapidly adopted by medical researchers, yet whether early career researchers in low and middle income countries possess the awareness and habits needed to use these tools safely remains poorly documented. This study characterized AI adoption patterns, hallucination awareness, and verification and disclosure practices among early career medical researchers in Pakistan. A cross sectional anonymous online survey was conducted among medical students, house officers, residents, physicians, and faculty involved in research or academic work across Pakistan (May 2026). Descriptive statistics and chi square tests were applied to 373 eligible responses. AI use was near universal (99.7%), with 60.3% using AI tools daily. The most commonly reported tool in this sample was Claude (40.5%), followed by ChatGPT (29.2%) and Perplexity (26.0%), though this ranking likely reflects sampling characteristics. Despite high adoption, 59.2% typically did not verify AI outputs before use, and 40.2% had never heard that AI can generate fabricated scientific references. In behavioral vignettes, 36.5% assumed convincing AI generated references were authentic, and 54.2% would continue using remaining AI content after discovering one fabricated reference. Formal research training was strongly associated with consistent disclosure (51.7% vs. 17.1%; chi square=48.43, p less than 0.001). Role, daily use frequency, and research training were not significantly associated with verification behavior. Early career medical researchers in Pakistan demonstrate high AI adoption alongside incomplete hallucination awareness and infrequent verification, a pattern that may carry implications for research integrity. Formal training was the only factor significantly associated with consistent disclosure. Integration of AI literacy into medical curricula and institutional governance frameworks merits consideration.

Spousal caregivers of individuals with Alzheimers disease and related dementias frequently experience elevated perceived stress, caregiver burden, and loneliness, which are associated with adverse health outcomes. Early identification is therefore critical for timely intervention. Existing approaches commonly rely on wearable sensor data and standardized psychological questionnaires, while recent multimodal methods aim to improve prediction by integrating behavioral and linguistic information. In this study, we explored three modality configurations, wearable-derived features, interview-based text, and their combination, to classify caregiver psychological risk using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Zarit Burden Interview, and UCLA Loneliness Scale. We compared traditional machine learning models and large language models (LLMs) (Gemini 2.0, Llama 4, and GPT-4o) under psychometrician-centered and caregiver-centered prompting strategies. Traditional machine learning models performed better under multimodal settings, while LLMs achieved stronger performance with Interview-Only input. We further demonstrate that PSS was the most predictable construct and prompting strategies substantially influenced LLM performance.

Robot-assisted hematoma puncture has seen significant development in primary hospitals across the country. Sino Plan software system is the core of the intelligent surgical robot, independently developed by Sinovation.We conducted a comparative study of imaging indicators, such as residual hematoma volume and hematoma clearance rate, as well as prognostic indicators, in patients who underwent hematoma puncture at our hospital over a 9-year period, before and after the introduction of Sino Plan.The results indicated that following the application of Sino Plan, the hematoma clearance rate was significantly enhanced, and the residual hematoma volume was markedly reduced. Regarding patient prognosis, there was no significant difference in GCS scores between the two groups, but the incidence of adverse prognostic events was lower in patients where Sino Plan was utilized.In conclusion, this 9-year retrospective analysis at our hospital reveals that Sino Plan offers distinct advantages. However, its application in certain special cases suggests that further improvements to the software are warranted to better meet the demands of more specific clinical scenarios.

The retinal nerve fiber layer, composed of axon bundles converging toward the optic nerve, is a key biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma and other neurodegenerative diseases. High-resolution en face imaging of individual nerve fiber bundles offers morphological information beyond what conventional optical coherence tomography provides, yet clinical integration remains limited by the lack of automated analysis tools and normative data. Here, we imaged 14 healthy volunteers using time-domain full-field optical coherence tomography and adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and developed automated pipelines to quantify bundle width, trajectory, tortuosity, and orientation. Bundles were on average 25% wider at shallower retinal depths, width measurements were consistent across imaging modalities, and estimated axon count per bundle decreased significantly with age. Global trajectory analysis revealed systematic deviations of high resolution data from existing mathematical models, particularly in the temporal sector, leading us to propose two refined trajectory models. These normative results provide a foundation for high resolution biomarkers for use in investigations of retinal neurodegeneration.

Background: Individuals with body dysmorphic disorder misperceive defects of their physical appearance. Current evidence suggests that visual processing abnormalities may underlie this core symptom. Separate pre-clinical studies testing perceptual and attentional interventions and non-invasive neuromodulation suggest that these visual processing abnormalities may be modifiable, but their combined effects on neural connectivity and perceptual processing remain unclear. Methods: Thirty-nine unmedicated men and women with body dysmorphic disorder or subclinical body dysmorphic disorder received intermittent theta burst stimulation and continuous theta burst stimulation targeting the lateral parietal cortex combined with a visual attention modification paradigm during functional magnetic resonance imaging, in a crossover design. Dynamic effective connectivity within dorsal and ventral visual stream pathways was calculated, and global visual processing biases were assessed using the face inversion effect before and after stimulation plus attention modification. Results: Intermittent theta burst stimulation resulted in increased connectivity in higher-level dorsal visual stream pathways during naturalistic viewing following attention modification, whereas continuous theta burst stimulation was associated with reduced connectivity in lower-level dorsal pathways and increased connectivity in ventral stream pathways. These changes were accompanied by differential effects on global visual processing, with stimulation type modulating the magnitude of the face inversion effect. Conclusions: Combined neuromodulation and visual attention modification modulate visual system connectivity and perceptual processing in individuals with body dysmorphic disorder symptoms. These findings support a mechanistic link between dorsal-ventral stream dynamics and perceptual biases. Integrating neuromodulation with perceptual retraining may represent a viable approach for targeting core symptoms of distorted appearance perception.

Background: Consensus continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics, including time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), mean glucose, glucose management indicator, and glycemic variability, are essential for modern glucose assessment. However, these whole-day summaries do not explicitly partition nocturnal basal from daytime ambulatory glycemic burden. Objective: To develop and evaluate a complementary domain-based CGM framework that quantifies basal and daytime ambulatory glycemic exposure across oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived dysglycemia phenotypes. Methods: In this observational, clinic-based study, 253 individuals underwent OGTT with insulin measurement and CGM. Participants were classified using a prespecified OGTT-derived phenotyping algorithm, implemented through a deterministic rules-based web calculator, and collapsed into five groups: NoDM, Increased insulin resistance, Midzone Glycemia, Prediabetes, and Diabetes. CGM files were uniformly reprocessed by selecting the latest contiguous episode and retaining the most recent 15 calendar days with data. The 24-hour profile was partitioned into nocturnal basal (00:00 to <06:00) and daytime ambulatory (06:00 to <24:00) domains. Derived indices included Area of Basal Glycemia (ABG), Area of Prandial/Daytime Ambulatory Glycemia (APG), incremental ABG (iABG), incremental APG (iAPG), and exploratory deficit indices dABG and dAPG. Results: The final dataset contributed 3,647 analyzable CGM days. APG remained higher than ABG across all groups. Mean ABG/APG increased from 80.45/86.38 mg/dL in NoDM to 111.96/124.70 mg/dL in Diabetes. Mean iABG/iAPG increased from 5.65/6.60 to 34.12/38.91 mg/dL, whereas dABG/dAPG declined as dysglycemia worsened. Conclusions: The ABG/APG framework provides interpretable, domain-resolved CGM burden metrics that separate basal from daytime ambulatory exposure and distinguish total burden from above-threshold excess. These indices are proposed as adjunctive metrics to support dysglycemia phenotyping, early risk recognition, and treatment monitoring, but are not intended to replace established consensus CGM metrics or diagnostic criteria. External, prospective validation is required.

Introduction: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) by clinicians has increased rapidly in recent years, with large language models (LLMs) emerging as tools that can equal clinician diagnostic performance in simulated settings. However, limited data exist regarding physicians use of LLMs in real-world clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of LLM use among practicing hospitalists, identify which LLMs are most commonly utilized, and assess hospitalists' perceptions of the benefits and limitations of LLM use in clinical care. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of academic hospital medicine faculty across 8 institutions within the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN), a collaborative research consortium. Eligible participants included hospitalists practicing within participating HOMERuN sites during the study period. The survey assessed the frequency of LLM use, types of LLMs used, clinical applications, and physician perceptions regarding usefulness, efficiency, and concerns associated with LLM adoption. Results: 170 respondents (67.1%) reported ever using an LLM in clinical practice. Among LLM users, OpenEvidence was the most used tool (88.9%), followed by ChatGPT (58.5%), Google Gemini (26.9%), and Microsoft Copilot (20.5%). Only a minority of hospitalists reported using LLMs daily while seeing patients. The most common use cases of LLMs were answering diagnostic (77.1%) and management (77.6%) questions. A majority also reported using LLMs to identify or summarize primary literature (60.0%). Lack of trust in outputs (49.8%), uncertainty around institutional policies (48.6%), and lack of access to secure applications (43.1%) were cited as the most frequent barriers to using LLMs in practice. Discussion: The use of LLMs in clinical practice is already widespread, though regular or daily use is not yet typical. Concerns regarding reliability, patient privacy, and safe integration into clinical workflows remain significant barriers to broader adoption. The responsible implementation of LLMs in hospital medicine will require addressing these barriers.

Background: Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) experience cognitive and functional declines that can negatively impact mood and reduce feelings of self-efficacy. These changes can also lead to elevated distress in care partners (CPs). Therefore, interventions that address quality of life and psychosocial factors in people with MCI and their CPs are needed. Objective: The present study evaluated the impact of a multidomain lifestyle program, the Cognitive Empowerment Program (CEP), on changes in psychosocial functioning, particularly empowerment, in people with MCI and their CPs. Methods: Participants were 94 people with MCI (Mean= 75.1 years old, 45.7% female, 81.9% white) and their CPs (Mean= 69.1 years old, 71.3% female, 87.3% white) that completed the 12-month CEP program comprised of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial interventions. Questionnaires were administered pre- and post-program to assess empowerment, self-efficacy, meaning and purpose, depression, and stress in participants with MCI alongside empowerment, depression, stress, and caregiving burden in CPs. Results: After completing the CEP program, participants with MCI endorsed higher empowerment and self-efficacy as well as fewer symptoms of depression and perceived stress. CPs endorsed feeling more empowered despite elevated caregiver burden. Conclusions: These results suggest multidomain lifestyle programs can positively impact wellbeing in MCI. Future research should focus on refining delivery models, exploring integration with pharmacological treatments, prioritizing inclusion of diverse populations, and measuring long-term outcomes to strengthen the reach and impact of programs like CEP.

Patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) often face prolonged diagnostic delays and may increasingly turn to large language models (LLMs) to interpret their symptoms during this period. We evaluated whether an LLM could recognize PID from symptom descriptions derived from interviews with 21 PID patients. In a prior study, we showed that GPT-4o identified PID in 96% of cases when prompted with physician-written patient histories (Rider et al., JACI, 2024). Here, when prompted with symptom descriptions in patients' own words, GPT-5 identified PID in only 7 cases (33%), although it more broadly suggested immune system issues in 18 cases (81%). The gap between these findings indicates that LLMs are sensitive to the language and framing of symptom descriptions, performing substantially worse when patients describe their own symptoms in everyday language than when clinicians summarize patient histories in structured medical terms. This study underscores the need to carefully evaluate how LLMs are used in patient-facing applications.

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the standard of care for complex multivessel and left main coronary artery disease. However, current preoperative planning remains largely subjective, relying on qualitative interpretation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA), operator-dependent stenosis grading, and fragmented multi-software workflows. Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR), the reference standard for physiologic lesion assessment, is infrequently acquired preoperatively, leaving distal anastomosis planning without an objective hemodynamic basis. Methods: We developed a fully automated, AI-powered platform that converts routine CCTA into a patient-specific CABG planning workflow through five integrated modules: nnU-Net based segmentation of coronary lumen and calcification; quantitative morphological and topological characterization generating more than thirty descriptors; automated stenosis detection using a local reference-radius formulation; a nine-point composite scoring framework for distal anastomosis site selection incorporating luminal caliber, landing-zone length, calcification burden, distal perfusion reserve, and bifurcation proximity; and interactive virtual graft construction coupled to a distributed reduced-order solver for pre- and post-bypass FFR estimation. Results: Lumen segmentation achieved a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.96 {+/-} 0.01, whereas calcium segmentation achieved 0.73 {+/-} 0.15 on the held-out cohort. Platform-derived FFR demonstrated strong agreement with invasively measured FFR (r=0.96, mean absolute relative difference 1.73 {+/-}1.42%) across the evaluated lesions, supporting the physiologic validity of the reduced-order hemodynamic solver. End-to-end analysis from raw CCTA to hemodynamic assessment and virtual graft planning was completed in approximately seven minutes per case on a standard workstation, representing a substantial reduction in processing time compared with conventional multi-tool and CFD-based workflows. Conclusions: The proposed platform demonstrates the feasibility of rapid, reproducible, and physiology-informed CABG planning using routine CCTA. By integrating anatomical characterization, automated target-site analysis, virtual graft construction, and reduced-order hemodynamic assessment into a single workflow, the framework provides objective, quantitative surgical decision support compatible with routine clinical workflows. Keywords: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); Fractional flow reserve (FFR); Coronary CT angiography (CCTA); Surgical planning

Background: Accurate evaluation of fine motor abilities is a key aspect of neurological rehabilitation. However, conventional approaches like goniometry are limited by variations among raters and their difficulty in detecting active movement. On the other hand, computer vision-based software delivers non-invasive and quantitative analysis of hand movements. An innovative computer-vision-based software tool, F.A.I.R. Chance(C), was developed to track and analyze individual finger joint movements on a camera-equipped laptop and give real-time numerical feedback. However, its metrics require validation in a healthy population before the tool can be used for clinical purposes. Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of finger movement assessment by the F.A.I.R. Chance computer vision-based tool in healthy adult participants. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was done at MGM School of Physiotherapy, comprising 30 healthy participants between 18 and 60 years of age. Finger movements like flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction were measured with a standard handheld goniometer. These same finger movements were then measured with the tool at two time points separated by a 30-minute interval to determine the test-retest reliability. The tool's measurements were compared with the goniometric measurements to determine its concurrent validity. Test retest reliability was checked by the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient ICC (2,1), while concurrent validity was tested through Pearson's correlation coefficients. Results: Metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint motions demonstrated moderate to good test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.716-0.953) for the F.A.I.R. Chance tool. However, distal interphalangeal joint movements had lower consistency. Good reliability (ICC: 0.754-0.908) was seen for movements of abduction and adduction in the fingers. Strong concurrent validity for extension movements of the metacarpophalangeal joints (r=0.760-0.914) and moderate concurrent validity for flexion movements of the metacarpophalangeal joints (r=0.427-0.604) was demonstrated for all fingers for the F.A.I.R. Chance tool. Concurrent validity for adduction and abduction movements demonstrated a low to fair correlation with goniometric measurements (r=0.210-0.440). This is consistent with previous research showing poor agreement between goniometry and adduction-abduction movements of the fingers. Conclusion: The F.A.I.R. Chance tool shows good reliability and acceptable concurrent validity to assess fine motor movements in the healthy adult population. This sets a basis for further clinical study of the tool in the target population with fine motor impairments. Keywords: artificial intelligence; assistive technology; computer vision; fine motor evaluation; hand function;

Background: Store-and-forward teledermatology commonly relies on several patient-submitted photographs of the same concern, but most dermatology artificial intelligence models classify single images independently. Objective: To develop and internally validate a case-level diagnostic-support model that aggregates multiple patient-submitted photographs for common dermatologic conditions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective diagnostic-modeling study using the Skin Condition Image Network, a public dataset of deidentified self-taken dermatology images from US adults. We curated 2,336 cases comprising 5,041 images across 10 common inflammatory, allergic, and infectious conditions. Cases were split at the submission level into training, validation, and held-out test sets. Frozen general-purpose and dermatology-specific encoders were compared with image-level classifiers and a gated-attention multiple instance learning model that generated one case-level output from 1-3 images. Results: The strongest image-level baseline, dermatology-specific embeddings with random forest classification, achieved macro/micro ROC-AUCs of 0.797/0.854. Case-level aggregation improved discrimination, with dermatology-specific embeddings plus multiple instance learning achieving mean macro/micro ROC-AUCs of 0.819/0.863 across repeated stratified experiments. The locked final model achieved macro/micro ROC-AUCs of 0.800/0.849 on the held-out test set. Balanced-threshold sensitivity/specificity examples were 0.702/0.688 for eczema and 0.818/0.826 for urticaria. Limitations: Internal validation used a 10-condition subset from a US volunteer dataset; external validation, calibration, subgroup performance analysis, and prospective workflow studies are required. Conclusion: Modeling the teledermatology submission as a multi-image case better reflects asynchronous dermatology workflow than single-image classification. The model is preliminary clinician-facing support for structured review and triage, not autonomous diagnosis.

Background Gait impairment is a central sign of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) that is typically evaluated through subjective patient-reported questionnaires or objective in-clinic measures. These systems require substantial resources to administer and are poorly suited for longitudinal monitoring, however, emerging smartphone applications present an efficient alternative. We developed and assessed the validity of a data processing framework based on the SynapTrack smartphone application to assess gait function in individuals with CSM. Methods Participants completed walking tasks which were recorded on both the SynapTrack app and a gold standard gait mat. Acceleration data extracted from the smartphone by the app were filtered and processed to produce gait cycle features including velocity, step time, waveform features and frequency domain features. Standard gait features were compared across the two methods by correlation and Bland-Altman plots to assess validity. App-based gait features were then compared to the standard modified Japanese Orthopedic Assessment (mJOA) assessment to determine construct validity through correlation and ability to discriminate between individuals with CSM and healthy controls. Finally, intraclass correlation coefficients and coefficients of variation were used to measure test-retest reliability and standard variation across app features. Results A total of 110 participants were included in this study, of which 55 (50%) had CSM, 24 (22%) had peripheral neuropathy, and 31 (28%) were healthy controls. SynapTrack gait measures including velocity, step time, and double support showed strong validity as indicated through Bland-Altman plots and high correlation (>0.8) with mat features. In addition to the gait features, acceleration root mean square, acceleration crest, spectral entropy, and dominant frequency showed strong construct validity compared to the mJOA across correlation (0.2-0.54), trend test (p < 0.001), and AUROC (0.62-0.79) analyses. ICCs showed moderate test-retest reliability (0.52-0.67). Discussion The proposed framework for processing gait data showed strong validity compared to the gold standard mat and high construct validity compared to the mJOA suggesting the utility of the SynapTrack app as an efficient alternative to existing methods. The confirmation of gait metrics related to CSM severity and identification of relevant waveform and frequency domain features present opportunities to use smartphone apps to develop ecologically valid data driven markers of CSM severity.

The surge in medical imaging has spurred the development of vision-language models (VLMs) to alleviate radiologist workloads. However, clinical deployment is hindered by the lack of meaningful evaluation frameworks. Current metrics - ranging from semantic similarity to large language model (LLM) based judges - often fail to distinguish between clinically trivial and critical discrepancies, poorly reflecting real-world clinical judgment. To address this, we introduce DISCERN (Discordance and Significance-aware Entity-level Radiology Report Comparison). DISCERN is a significance-aware framework that weighs report errors based on their potential impact on patient care. Our results demonstrate that DISCERN powered by closed source LLMs aligns more closely with expert radiologist assessments than traditional metrics or current LLM evaluators, providing a more interpretable and clinically relevant benchmark. By modeling radiologist prioritization and entity-level feedback, DISCERN facilitates targeted model refinement and ensures the safer integration of generative AI into clinical workflows.

Background Informed consent depends on patients' understanding of anaesthesia risk, yet comprehension remains poor despite routine preoperative consultation. Conversational artificial intelligence (AI) could establish patient-reported understanding before clinician contact, but whether such systems can achieve patient-reported understanding comparable to clinician-delivered education remains unknown. Methods We conducted a randomised equivalence trial (n = 130) of PEAR (Preoperative Education of Anaesthesia Risks), a multilingual retrieval-augmented conversational AI grounded in institutional consent materials, versus standard preoperative consultation in adults undergoing elective surgery. Results A total of 130 adults (mean age 52.4 +/- 14.5 years) were enrolled. Post-consultation understanding scores in the PEAR group met the pre-specified equivalence criterion compared with standard consultation across all three primary measures. Patients who interacted with PEAR before clinician contact achieved understanding scores comparable to those receiving standard face-to-face consultation alone. PEAR reduced documentation and consultation time, corresponding to a projected annual net benefit of approximately SGD 0.99 million (USD 0.78 million) at a single tertiary centre. Conclusions A retrieval-augmented conversational AI achieved patient-reported understanding of anaesthesia risk equivalent to standard preoperative consultation while substantially improving workflow efficiency. These findings support supervised deployment of conversational AI within perioperative care pathways while preserving clinician oversight for verification and patient-specific decision-making.

Abstract Background: The sanitation crisis poses a significant public health risk, leading to diseases like diarrhea, cholera, and typhoid, which impede children's health and development in developing countries like Uganda. Improving sanitation infrastructure is crucial for safeguarding child health and future generations. However, the link between sanitation and children's health is complex, influenced by various factors. This investigation in Gulu scrutinizes the correlation between sanitation practices and child well-being, considering moderating factors such as age, climate, and consistent water accessibility. Methods: The study used a convergent parallel design with equal priority. The Social Ecological Model, Social Learning Theory, and Diffusion of Innovations Model guided it. Researchers collected data from 10 health facilities and 317 households, using purposive and simple random sampling. They used sampling proportions proportional to village size within strata. The researcher analyzed quantitative data using SPSS with factor analysis, structural equation modeling, and multivariate analysis. To analyze qualitative data, they used DQA Minor Lite software, which facilitated thematic analysis. Results: The finding shows 56.8% of households had low socio-economic status. Sanitation was poor; 24.9% household had improved latrines, 20.5% had handwashing facilities with soap, and 68.1% used basic anal cleansing. For nutrition, 38.5% of children were malnourished by MUAC; by Z-scores, 28.7% were stunted, 16.4% underweight, 13.6% wasted. Diarrhea affected 62% of children. Climate worsened sanitation: 48.3% had latrines collapse from floods, and 63.4% of waterborne diseases occurred in both dry and wet seasons. Moderation analysis on childhood diarrhea shows that sociocultural factors ({beta} = -0.20, p < 0.001), sanitation ({beta} = -0.15, p < 0.001), and health system response ({beta} = -0.18, p < 0.001) reduced diarrhea. Climate change increased risk ({beta} = 0.15, p < 0.001) and moderated sanitation effects ({beta} = 0.01, p < 0.05). Models explained 10-14% variance. Age and water access had no moderating effect. While childhood malnutrition shows that sociocultural factors ({beta} = -0.43, p < 0.001) and health system response ({beta} = -0.13, p < 0.001) reduced malnutrition. Sanitation had no effect ({beta} = 0.01, p > 0.05). Age increased malnutrition risk ({beta} = 0.28, p < 0.01) and moderated sociocultural effects ({beta} = 0.16, p < 0.001), but not sanitation. The model explained 21% variance, R{superscript 2} = 0.21, p < 0.001. Conclusion: Sociocultural improvements and health system responses lower both diarrhea and malnutrition. Climate worsens diarrhea and alters sanitation's impact. Age worsens malnutrition and changes sociocultural effects. These findings are valuable for policymakers, healthcare professionals, and researchers

Background and Aims: Steatotic liver disease (SLD) has high clinical and public health relevance. Robust population estimates of SLD and its subcategories are challenging due to the limitations of ultrasound measurements or non-invasive scores, particularly for low-grade steatosis. We aimed to quantify SLD prevalence using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the population-based German National Cohort (NAKO). Methods: Hepatic multi-echo Dixon MRI was performed at 5 dedicated study sites with identical setup across Germany. Liver fat (proton density fat fraction, PDFF), R2* as proxy for liver iron, and liver volume were assessed. The resulting data of N = 29'842 individuals (age range 20-72 years) were weighted by survey weights for regional representativeness, resulting in a sample of 50% women and a mean age of 45.6 years. SLD was defined as PDFF [&ge;] 5.75%, and sex-specific prevalence according to age, BMI, socioeconomic status and geographic region was calculated. Results: Overall, SLD prevalence was 21.3% in women and 35.7% in men, and the majority were metabolic dysfunction-associated (MASLD, 89.3% of all SLD cases). Prevalence increased with age in a sex-specific pattern, suggesting potential menopausal effects in women. There was a relevant prevalence of SLD in individuals with normal weight (5.3% in women, 13.2% in men) and the age group <25 years (7.5% in women, 11.9% in women). Differences in prevalence between low and high socioeconomic status were more pronounced in women (37% vs 15.8%) compared to men (45.5% vs 30.3%). Conclusions: Data underscore the high public health relevance of SLD and its subcategory MASLD. The considerable prevalence in groups historically considered low-risk, such as younger or lean individuals, emphasizes the need for raising awareness early.

Background: Traditional diagnostic models lack explainability, while multimodal language models prone to hallucination remain unsafe for medical education. An interactive, risk-free artificial intelligence framework is required to serve as a reliable clinical mentor for radiology trainees. Methods: We propose a multi-agent architecture decoupling deterministic image analysis from generative consultation. Specialized computer vision models perform anatomical localization and pathological segmentation. These quantitative outputs are synthesized into a structured payload, which grounds a locally hosted large language model (LLaVA 7B) using strict prompt guardrails and prerequisite protocols. Results: The system effectively eliminates visual hallucinations by intercepting unanchored queries. The artificial intelligence tutor successfully contextualizes spatial anomalies and baseline metrics, generating accurate conversational explanations and formally structured radiology reports while strictly enforcing medical safety disclaimers. Discussion and Conclusion: By anchoring language generation exclusively to verified algorithmic realities, this framework transforms opaque diagnostic models into safe, interactive educational simulators. This establishes a highly reliable paradigm for integrating explainable artificial intelligence into medical training.

Pathological activity within frontal cortical circuits is common in many neuropsychiatric disorders, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We developed an invasive brain mapping protocol in which temporary electrodes are implanted in candidate sites to identify personalized stimulation targets that can acutely relieve OCD symptoms. We found that stimulation within segments of the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) focally suppressed the structurally and functionally connected region of prefrontal and cingulate cortex. By leveraging the topographic organization of the ALIC, we reversibly inactivated frontal cortical sites with ALIC stimulation to determine which cortical regions are necessary for sustaining OCD symptoms. Stimulation of ventral capsule (VC) near the globus pallidus within the ALIC was associated with suppression of lateral orbitofrontal cortex activity and acute and long-term improvements in OCD symptoms. These results provide a paradigm for leveraging ALIC topography to deliver targeted connectomic neuromodulation to frontal cortex to treat neuropsychiatric disorders.

Objective: To address the need for improved measurement of the ways contraception impacts the baseline menstrual cycle (i.e., contraceptive-induced menstrual changes; CIMCs) by assembling an interdisciplinary, global research collective to rigorously develop a person-centered measure for CIMCs in multiple languages. As the first step, this paper reports on our conceptual model development, which is the foundation for ongoing measure development. Study design: We conducted 18 focus groups with 106 people experiencing CIMCs while using hormonal or intrauterine contraception in Durban, South Africa, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and Portland Oregon, United States. We used a virtual affinity mapping approach to analyze qualitative data, which was the basis of our conceptual model along with relevant theory and related models in the literature. Results: The conceptual model of experiences with CIMCs depicts the baseline menstrual cycle, including CIMCs and conceptually-linked effects and the impacts and perceptions of those CIMCs. We found key domains of changes in pain, bleeding volume, bleeding patterns, and characteristics of blood. Conclusion: Our CIMC conceptual model will inform development of a measure with evidence of validation across three language and global contexts. Adoption of a person-centered, standardized CIMC measurement across trials will improve knowledge and decision-making between methods.