Back

Prevalence and Characteristics of Steatotic Liver Disease in Germany - Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the German National Cohort (NAKO)

von Itter, M.-N.; Grune, E.; Nonnenmacher, T.; Rach, S.; Flis, M.; Haueise, T.; Weiss, J.; Brenner, H.; Keil, T.; Roden, M.; Schulze, M. B.; Schulz-Menger, J. E.; Völzke, H.; Stefan, N.; Schlett, C. L.; Kauczor, H.-U.; Machann, J.; Bamberg, F.; Nattenmüller, J.; Norajitra, T.; Rospleszcz, S.

2026-06-01 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.05.29.26354407 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Aims: Steatotic liver disease (SLD) has high clinical and public health relevance. Robust population estimates of SLD and its subcategories are challenging due to the limitations of ultrasound measurements or non-invasive scores, particularly for low-grade steatosis. We aimed to quantify SLD prevalence using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the population-based German National Cohort (NAKO). Methods: Hepatic multi-echo Dixon MRI was performed at 5 dedicated study sites with identical setup across Germany. Liver fat (proton density fat fraction, PDFF), R2* as proxy for liver iron, and liver volume were assessed. The resulting data of N = 29'842 individuals (age range 20-72 years) were weighted by survey weights for regional representativeness, resulting in a sample of 50% women and a mean age of 45.6 years. SLD was defined as PDFF [&ge;] 5.75%, and sex-specific prevalence according to age, BMI, socioeconomic status and geographic region was calculated. Results: Overall, SLD prevalence was 21.3% in women and 35.7% in men, and the majority were metabolic dysfunction-associated (MASLD, 89.3% of all SLD cases). Prevalence increased with age in a sex-specific pattern, suggesting potential menopausal effects in women. There was a relevant prevalence of SLD in individuals with normal weight (5.3% in women, 13.2% in men) and the age group <25 years (7.5% in women, 11.9% in women). Differences in prevalence between low and high socioeconomic status were more pronounced in women (37% vs 15.8%) compared to men (45.5% vs 30.3%). Conclusions: Data underscore the high public health relevance of SLD and its subcategory MASLD. The considerable prevalence in groups historically considered low-risk, such as younger or lean individuals, emphasizes the need for raising awareness early.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
6
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.8%
10
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
11
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
13
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Journal of Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
18
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%