Back

Prevalence and Characteristics of Steatotic Liver Disease in Germany - Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the German National Cohort (NAKO)

von Itter, M.-N.; Grune, E.; Nonnenmacher, T.; Rach, S.; Flis, M.; Haueise, T.; Weiss, J.; Brenner, H.; Keil, T.; Roden, M.; Schulze, M. B.; Schulz-Menger, J. E.; Völzke, H.; Stefan, N.; Schlett, C. L.; Kauczor, H.-U.; Machann, J.; Bamberg, F.; Nattenmüller, J.; Norajitra, T.; Rospleszcz, S.

2026-06-01 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.05.29.26354407 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Aims: Steatotic liver disease (SLD) has high clinical and public health relevance. Robust population estimates of SLD and its subcategories are challenging due to the limitations of ultrasound measurements or non-invasive scores, particularly for low-grade steatosis. We aimed to quantify SLD prevalence using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the population-based German National Cohort (NAKO). Methods: Hepatic multi-echo Dixon MRI was performed at 5 dedicated study sites with identical setup across Germany. Liver fat (proton density fat fraction, PDFF), R2* as proxy for liver iron, and liver volume were assessed. The resulting data of N = 29'842 individuals (age range 20-72 years) were weighted by survey weights for regional representativeness, resulting in a sample of 50% women and a mean age of 45.6 years. SLD was defined as PDFF [&ge;] 5.75%, and sex-specific prevalence according to age, BMI, socioeconomic status and geographic region was calculated. Results: Overall, SLD prevalence was 21.3% in women and 35.7% in men, and the majority were metabolic dysfunction-associated (MASLD, 89.3% of all SLD cases). Prevalence increased with age in a sex-specific pattern, suggesting potential menopausal effects in women. There was a relevant prevalence of SLD in individuals with normal weight (5.3% in women, 13.2% in men) and the age group <25 years (7.5% in women, 11.9% in women). Differences in prevalence between low and high socioeconomic status were more pronounced in women (37% vs 15.8%) compared to men (45.5% vs 30.3%). Conclusions: Data underscore the high public health relevance of SLD and its subcategory MASLD. The considerable prevalence in groups historically considered low-risk, such as younger or lean individuals, emphasizes the need for raising awareness early.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
5
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.5%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.5%
11
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
12
Journal of Hepatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Metabolism
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
21
Metabolomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Diabetes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
27
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%