Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Computer Vision-Based Tool for Quantitative Finger Movement Analysis

Background: Accurate evaluation of fine motor abilities is a key aspect of neurological rehabilitation. However, conventional approaches like goniometry are limited by variations among raters and their difficulty in detecting active movement. On the other hand, computer vision-based software delivers non-invasive and quantitative analysis of hand movements. An innovative computer-vision-based software tool, F.A.I.R. Chance(C), was developed to track and analyze individual finger joint movements on a camera-equipped laptop and give real-time numerical feedback. However, its metrics require validation in a healthy population before the tool can be used for clinical purposes. Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of finger movement assessment by the F.A.I.R. Chance computer vision-based tool in healthy adult participants. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was done at MGM School of Physiotherapy, comprising 30 healthy participants between 18 and 60 years of age. Finger movements like flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction were measured with a standard handheld goniometer. These same finger movements were then measured with the tool at two time points separated by a 30-minute interval to determine the test-retest reliability. The tool's measurements were compared with the goniometric measurements to determine its concurrent validity. Test retest reliability was checked by the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient ICC (2,1), while concurrent validity was tested through Pearson's correlation coefficients. Results: Metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint motions demonstrated moderate to good test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.716-0.953) for the F.A.I.R. Chance tool. However, distal interphalangeal joint movements had lower consistency. Good reliability (ICC: 0.754-0.908) was seen for movements of abduction and adduction in the fingers. Strong concurrent validity for extension movements of the metacarpophalangeal joints (r=0.760-0.914) and moderate concurrent validity for flexion movements of the metacarpophalangeal joints (r=0.427-0.604) was demonstrated for all fingers for the F.A.I.R. Chance tool. Concurrent validity for adduction and abduction movements demonstrated a low to fair correlation with goniometric measurements (r=0.210-0.440). This is consistent with previous research showing poor agreement between goniometry and adduction-abduction movements of the fingers. Conclusion: The F.A.I.R. Chance tool shows good reliability and acceptable concurrent validity to assess fine motor movements in the healthy adult population. This sets a basis for further clinical study of the tool in the target population with fine motor impairments. Keywords: artificial intelligence; assistive technology; computer vision; fine motor evaluation; hand function;