Back

From CCTA to Surgical Strategy: An Integrated AI Framework for Patient-Specific Coronary artery bypass grafting Planning

Rezaeitaleshmahalleh, M.; Masoumi, S.; Debalme, E.; Sundt, T. M.; Aranki, S. F.; Shin, B.; Nezami, F. R.

2026-06-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.28.26354400 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the standard of care for complex multivessel and left main coronary artery disease. However, current preoperative planning remains largely subjective, relying on qualitative interpretation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA), operator-dependent stenosis grading, and fragmented multi-software workflows. Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR), the reference standard for physiologic lesion assessment, is infrequently acquired preoperatively, leaving distal anastomosis planning without an objective hemodynamic basis. Methods: We developed a fully automated, AI-powered platform that converts routine CCTA into a patient-specific CABG planning workflow through five integrated modules: nnU-Net based segmentation of coronary lumen and calcification; quantitative morphological and topological characterization generating more than thirty descriptors; automated stenosis detection using a local reference-radius formulation; a nine-point composite scoring framework for distal anastomosis site selection incorporating luminal caliber, landing-zone length, calcification burden, distal perfusion reserve, and bifurcation proximity; and interactive virtual graft construction coupled to a distributed reduced-order solver for pre- and post-bypass FFR estimation. Results: Lumen segmentation achieved a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 0.96 {+/-} 0.01, whereas calcium segmentation achieved 0.73 {+/-} 0.15 on the held-out cohort. Platform-derived FFR demonstrated strong agreement with invasively measured FFR (r=0.96, mean absolute relative difference 1.73 {+/-}1.42%) across the evaluated lesions, supporting the physiologic validity of the reduced-order hemodynamic solver. End-to-end analysis from raw CCTA to hemodynamic assessment and virtual graft planning was completed in approximately seven minutes per case on a standard workstation, representing a substantial reduction in processing time compared with conventional multi-tool and CFD-based workflows. Conclusions: The proposed platform demonstrates the feasibility of rapid, reproducible, and physiology-informed CABG planning using routine CCTA. By integrating anatomical characterization, automated target-site analysis, virtual graft construction, and reduced-order hemodynamic assessment into a single workflow, the framework provides objective, quantitative surgical decision support compatible with routine clinical workflows. Keywords: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); Fractional flow reserve (FFR); Coronary CT angiography (CCTA); Surgical planning

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
2
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
6
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
13
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
25
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%