Back

Case-level artificial intelligence for multi-photo teledermatology submissions: development and internal validation using patient-submitted dermatology images

Patel, V. P.; Sheth, N.; Patel, A.; Patel, Y.

2026-06-01 dermatology
10.64898/2026.05.21.26353816 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Store-and-forward teledermatology commonly relies on several patient-submitted photographs of the same concern, but most dermatology artificial intelligence models classify single images independently. Objective: To develop and internally validate a case-level diagnostic-support model that aggregates multiple patient-submitted photographs for common dermatologic conditions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective diagnostic-modeling study using the Skin Condition Image Network, a public dataset of deidentified self-taken dermatology images from US adults. We curated 2,336 cases comprising 5,041 images across 10 common inflammatory, allergic, and infectious conditions. Cases were split at the submission level into training, validation, and held-out test sets. Frozen general-purpose and dermatology-specific encoders were compared with image-level classifiers and a gated-attention multiple instance learning model that generated one case-level output from 1-3 images. Results: The strongest image-level baseline, dermatology-specific embeddings with random forest classification, achieved macro/micro ROC-AUCs of 0.797/0.854. Case-level aggregation improved discrimination, with dermatology-specific embeddings plus multiple instance learning achieving mean macro/micro ROC-AUCs of 0.819/0.863 across repeated stratified experiments. The locked final model achieved macro/micro ROC-AUCs of 0.800/0.849 on the held-out test set. Balanced-threshold sensitivity/specificity examples were 0.702/0.688 for eczema and 0.818/0.826 for urticaria. Limitations: Internal validation used a 10-condition subset from a US volunteer dataset; external validation, calibration, subgroup performance analysis, and prospective workflow studies are required. Conclusion: Modeling the teledermatology submission as a multi-image case better reflects asynchronous dermatology workflow than single-image classification. The model is preliminary clinician-facing support for structured review and triage, not autonomous diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.8%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.7%
10
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
14
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
21
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%