Defining a person-centered conceptual model to inform measurement of contraception's effects on the menstrual cycle
Mackenzie, A.; Smit, J.; Miric, M.; Edelman, A.; Beksinska, M.; Catano, A.; Chung, S.; Cuevas, E.; Delacerda, M.; Forbes, M.; Hoppes, E.; Ingeno, L.; Jacobson, L.; Khomo, M.; Lebetkin, E.; Majola, T.; Matos, M.; Mavundla, M.; McCaffrey, S.; Mendez, A.; Mendez, M.; Mhlaba, N.; Mosery, N.; Ndlovu, L.; Qiya, B.; Stankevitz, K.; Sullivan, A.; Zulu, B.
Show abstract
Objective: To address the need for improved measurement of the ways contraception impacts the baseline menstrual cycle (i.e., contraceptive-induced menstrual changes; CIMCs) by assembling an interdisciplinary, global research collective to rigorously develop a person-centered measure for CIMCs in multiple languages. As the first step, this paper reports on our conceptual model development, which is the foundation for ongoing measure development. Study design: We conducted 18 focus groups with 106 people experiencing CIMCs while using hormonal or intrauterine contraception in Durban, South Africa, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and Portland Oregon, United States. We used a virtual affinity mapping approach to analyze qualitative data, which was the basis of our conceptual model along with relevant theory and related models in the literature. Results: The conceptual model of experiences with CIMCs depicts the baseline menstrual cycle, including CIMCs and conceptually-linked effects and the impacts and perceptions of those CIMCs. We found key domains of changes in pain, bleeding volume, bleeding patterns, and characteristics of blood. Conclusion: Our CIMC conceptual model will inform development of a measure with evidence of validation across three language and global contexts. Adoption of a person-centered, standardized CIMC measurement across trials will improve knowledge and decision-making between methods.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.