Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with esophageal gland duct involvement: A single-center study on safety, efficacy, and outcomes in 748 cases

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC), with or without the esophageal gland duct involvement (DI or NDI), has been reported in small case series, but ESD-related safety, efficacy, and outcomes remain unknown. We conducted a retrospective study of those issues in consecutive 748 patients treated at our center in China. Material and Methods: Over the study period from January 2014 to January 2019, we identified 748 eligible SESCC patients who were divided into the DI (22.6%, 169/748) and NDI (77.4%, 579/748) groups, based on histopathologic reports. Following the European and Japanese guidelines on endoscopic resection of SESCC, we investigated and statistically compared characteristics of clinicopathology and ESD-related safety, efficacy, and prognosis between DI and NDI groups. Results: The mean age of patients was 64.9 years for the cohort and significantly older in the DI (66.1) than in the NDI (64.5) group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in smoking/alcohol abuse and comorbidity. Endoscopically, the DI group showed significantly larger tumor size and deeper invasion than the NDI group. There was no ESD-related death in the cohort. Although the en bloc resection rate was 100%, the complete and curative resection rates were significantly lower in the DI (88.2% and 61.2%, respectively) than in the NDI (96.4%, and 86.9%, respectively) group (P<0.01). ESD-related infection (0.7%) and bleeding (2.3%) rates were very low and no significant difference was found between the two groups. Only one perforation (0.1%) occurred in the NDI group. Post-ESD stenosis was 11.9% for the cohort and significantly more common in the DI (20.7%) than in the NDI (9.3%) group (P<0.01). The overall survival rate was 95.7% for the cohort and significantly lower in the NDI (94.6%) than in the DI (100.0%) group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in disease-specific death, recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis, and the requirement for subsequent chemoradiation therapy and surgery between the two groups. Conclusion: In our cohort, there was no ESD-associated death; ESD-related infection and bleeding were minimal; and perforation was rare. Post-ESD stenosis was 11.9% in prevalence and successfully managed by endoscopic dilation. The overall survival rate was 95.7%. Compared to the NDI group, the DI group showed older age, larger tumor size, deeper invasion, lower complete and curative resection rates, higher prevalence of post-ESD stenosis; there was no significant difference in disease-specific death. Taken together, ESD was safe with excellent efficacy and prognosis for endoscopic resection of SESCC with or without esophageal gland duct involvement. Keywords: superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, endoscopic submucosal dissection, ductal involvement, survival, postoperative stenosis.