Back

Mendelian randomization study on the association between cheese intake and diabetes

Yang, S.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Wang, W.-X.

2024-01-13 endocrinology
10.1101/2024.01.12.24301232 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo explore whether there is a causal relationship between cheese intake and diabetes through Mendel randomization (MR). MethodsTwo samples of MR were used to verify the causal effect of cheese intake on diabetes. The analysis was conducted using inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger regression methods. We used a meta-analysis of publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to compile statistical datasets, and cheese intake data as exposure factors were sourced from individuals of European ancestry in the UK biobank (n=451486). At the same time, GWASs public summary statistical data set is also used for self reporting non cancer disease codes: diabetes data included in the Finnish database (total n=184404; case=1219, control=183185) (http://www.finngen.fi/en)as a result. ResultWe selected 108 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with genome-wide significance as instrumental variables from the GWAS intake of cheese. IVW method results show a causal relationship between cheese intake and diabetes ({beta}=- 1.196, SE=0.3817, P=0.001729). MR Egger regression results show that directed pleiotropy is unlikely to bias the results (intercept=0.015; P=0.58), but there is no causal relationship between cheese intake and diabetes ({beta}=- 2.073, SE=1.621, P=0.206). The results of weighted median method also showed that there was no causal relationship between cheese intake and diabetes ({beta}=- 0.7828, SE=0.5701, P=0.1698). Cochrans Q-test and funnel plot indicate no evidence of heterogeneity and asymmetry, indicating the absence of directed pleiotropy. ConclusionThe results of MR analysis support that cheese intake may have a causal relationship with the reduced risk of diabetes.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.