Meta-analysis of the Effect of Orlistat on The Body Mass Index in Obese Subjects
Jeong, G.; Han, D.; Ahmed, M.; Kim, D. R.
Show abstract
Obesity is a widespread health issue worldwide. Therefore, evaluating existing pharmaceuticals and developing new effective strategies to mitigate the problem is essential. Although literature reviews of a broad range of interventions for managing obesity exist, a recent evaluation of the efficacy of orlistat is lacking. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the efficacy of orlistat on body mass index (BMI) and the impact of age, dose, duration, and comorbidities. A literature search of orlistat on PubMed was carried out, and 177 placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials published in the last twenty years were identified. Sixteen studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected for further analysis. Two investigators independently extracted data from the clinical reports using a predefined protocol. We conducted a meta-analysis using random and mixed effects models with different moderators. We found that, on aggregate, the orlistat group reduced their BMI by 0.72 kg/m2 (P < 0.05) compared to the placebo group. In addition, a longer duration of intervention led to a greater decrease in BMI. Moreover, patients with comorbidities experienced a smaller change in BMI. In conclusion, the evidence suggests that orlistat moderately reduces BMI in obese subjects. The effect of lifestyle modifications, side effects, and drug interactions should be assessed in future studies.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 92%
- TXN, a Xanthohumol Derivative, Attenuates High-Fat Diet Induced Hepatic Steatosis by Antagonizing PPARγ 90%
- Direct Economic Burden of Mental Health Disorders Associated with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists modestly reduced blood pressure among patients with and without diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis and meta-regression 92%
- Clinical Characteristics Of Users Of Weight Loss Drugs: Population-Based Case-Control Study 92%
- A Microbiome-targeting Fiber-enriched Nutritional Formula is Well Tolerated and Improves Quality of Life and Hemoglobin A1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of phentermine/topiramate in adults with overweight or obesity: A meta-analysis and systematic review 97%
- Outpatient screening of health status and lifestyle among post-bariatric patients during the Covid-19 pandemic in Sao Paulo, Brazil. 88%
- Exposure to early life stress impairs weight loss maintenance success in mice. 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Eating Disorders In weight-related Therapy (EDIT): Protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of eating disorder risk in behavioural weight management 94%
- Effectiveness of aerobic physical exercise on depression symptoms in adults: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials 93%
- A feasibility study to test a novel approach to dietary weight loss with a focus on assisting informed decision making in food selection 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of use and interest in using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight loss: a population study in Great Britain 92%
- The effects of creatine supplementation on cognitive performance - a randomised controlled study 91%
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.