Assessment of diversity-based approaches used by American Universities to increase recruitment and retention of biomedical sciences faculty members: a scoping review protocol
Petersen, B.; Koshy-Chenthittayil, S.; Caromile, L. A.
Show abstract
Considering the recent increased interest in diversifying the biomedical faculty workforce, a thorough assessment of the existing approaches is needed to provide guidance to universities. Hence this scoping review will be guided by the following research question, "What are the diversity-based approaches used by American Universities to increase recruitment and retention of biomedical sciences faculty members?". The review follows the Population-Concept-Context methodology for Joanna Briggs Institution Scoping Reviews. Relevant peer-reviewed studies conducted during the last 10 years will be identified from electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, and Embase. The search strings using keywords such as "biomedical faculty/researcher," "hiring/retention," and "diversity/minority/underrepresented" will be conducted using Boolean logic. Two independent reviewers will conduct all title and abstract screening, followed by a full article screening and data extraction. Due to the possible heterogeneity of the studies, we hope to use either a narrative analysis and/or descriptive figures/tables to depict the results. The review will present various diversity programs that have been implemented and evaluated in American Universities to increase the recruitment and retention of biomedical sciences faculty.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Assessment of a Sustainable PhD Internship Program Supporting Diverse Biomedical Career Outcomes 93%
- Analysis of NIH K99/R00 Awards and the Career Progression of Awardees 93%
- Female-dominated disciplines have lower evaluated research quality and funding success rates, for men and women 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: an international cross-sectional survey 94%
- Factors and mediators impacting the number of undergraduate research mentees at a research-intensive Hispanic-serving institution 94%
- Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers' opinions on success indicators 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 92%
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 92%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 92%
- PREP-aring is worth it: Success of the Case Western Reserve University Post-baccalaureate Research Education Program and its Scholars 92%
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.