Back

Combination of Baricitinib plus Remdesivir and Dexamethasone improves time to recovery and mortality among hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 infection

Perez Gutierrez, V. A.; Shah, V.; Afzal, A.; Khalid, A.; Yangco, A.; Ocrospoma, S.; Cemalovic, N.; Pillai, A.; Kasubhai, M.; Dimitrov, V.; Menon, V.

2022-04-05 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2022.04.04.22273425 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThere seems to be a gap in the therapeutic options for severe Covid-19 pneumonia. Though the beneficial effect of combination treatment with baricitnib and remdesivir in accelerating clinical status improvement is described, the impact of the triple therapy with baricitinib + remdesivir/dexamethasone is not known. MethodsA retrospective observational study comparing the effect of baricitinib plus standard treatment (remdesivir and dexamethasone) with standard therapy in patients requiring [≥] 5 L/min O2 was conducted. The primary outcome was to compared time to recovery in both groups, and the secondary outcomes was to determine mortality rate at discharge. ResultsOf 457 patients hospitalized during the study period, 51 patients received standard treatment while 88 patients received baricitinib plus standard treatment. In baricitinib group, the rate ratio of recovery was 1.28 (95%CI 0.84-1.94, p=0.24) with a reduction in median time to recovery of 3 days compared to standard treatment group. Subgroup analysis based on Ordinal Scale showed reduction in median time to recovery by 4 and 2 days with rate ratio of recovery of 2.95 (1.03-8.42, p =0.04) and 1.80 (1.09-2.98, p=0.02) in Ordinal Scale 5 and 6 respectively. No benefit was found in the Ordinal Scale 7 subgroup. An overall decrease in rate (15.9% vs 31.4% p=0.03) a likelihood (OR 0.41, 95%CI 0.18-0.94, p=0.03) of mortality was observed in the baricitinib group. Bacteremia and thrombosis were noted in the Baricitinib group, but comparable with the Standard of care group. ConclusionBaricitinib with standard therapy reduced time to recovery and offer mortality benefit in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia."

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.