Faster, Higher, Stronger - Together? A bibliometric analysis of author distribution in top medical education journals
Whitehead, C.; Cartmill, C.; Rodrigues, E.; Correia, A.; Wondimagegn, D.; Salessie, T.; Costa, M. J.
Show abstract
IntroductionMedical education and medical education research are growing industries that have become increasingly globalized. Recognition of the colonial foundations of medical education has led to a growing focus on issues of equity, absence, and marginalization. One area of absence that has been under-explored is that of published voices from low- and middle-income countries. We undertook a bibliometric analysis of five top medical education journals to determine which countries were absent and which countries were represented in prestigious first and last authorship positions. MethodsWeb of Science was searched for all articles and reviews published between 2012 and 2018 within Academic Medicine, Medical Education, Advances in Health Sciences Education, Medical Teacher, and BMC Medical Education. Country of origin was identified for first and last author of each publication, and the number of publications originating from each country were counted. ResultsOur analysis revealed a dominance of first and last authors from five countries: USA, Canada, United Kingdom, Netherlands, and Australia. Authors from these five countries had first or last authored 74% of publications. Of the 195 countries in the world, 53% were not represented by a single publication. There was a slight increase in the percentage of publications from outside of these five countries from 22% in 2012 to 29% in 2018. ConclusionThe dominance of wealthy nations within spaces that claim to be international is a finding that requires attention. We draw upon analogies from modern Olympic sport and our own collaborative research process to show how academic publishing continues to be a colonized space that advantages those from wealthy and English-speaking countries. Key messagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABS-Authors from a small number of high income countries are over-represented in published journal articles on medical education. What this study adds-This study shows that almost three-quarters of first and last authorship positions in several prominent medical education journals are held by authors from only five countries: USA, Canada, UK, Netherlands, Australia. -Authors from low- and middle-income countries, and from countries where English is not the dominant language, are under-represented in prestigious first and last authorship positions within the medical education literature. -As a field that claims to be international in scope, perspectives from outside of these five dominant countries are under-represented, limiting the breadth of views that make up the field of medical education. How this study might affect research, practice or policy-This study provides support for academics, academic institutions, and academic publishers in establishing policies that prioritize the inclusion of authors from low- and middle-income countries and from countries in which English is not the dominant language. -Explicitly including descriptions of the ways research teams address potential power imbalances in research studies that involve collaboration between HIC and LMIC authors, as well as fluent English and less-fluent English speakers in English language publications may allow further development of more inclusive models of international research collaboration.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the Nature of Open Science Practices Across Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An Audit 97%
- Woman Authorship in Pre-print Versus Peer-Reviewed Oral Health-Related Publications: A Two-Year Observational Study 95%
- Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: an international cross-sectional survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 94%
- Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open-access publishing each year 93%
- Health System Resilience-enhancing Strategies for Managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concerns (PHEIC): Success and Challenges A Systematic Review Protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diversity and inclusion: A hidden additional benefit of Open Data 94%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 93%
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 94%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 92%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification and Attribution of Weekly Periodic Biases in Epidemiological Time Series Data 89%
- Occupational safety and health aspects of corporate social responsibility reporting in Japan: comparison between 2012 and 2020 88%
- First report of reference guided genome assembly of Black Bengal goat (Capra hircus) 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.