Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Current Drugs against COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Net-work Meta Analysis
Li, Y.; He, W.
Show abstract
The rapid spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has greatly disrupted the livelihood of many people around the world. To date, more than 35.16 million COVID-19 cases with 1.037million total deaths have been reported worldwide. Compared with China, where the disease was first reported, cases of COVID-19, the number of confirmed cases for the disease in the rest of the world have been incredibly high. Even though several dugs have been suggested to be used against the disease, the said interventions should be backed by empirical clinical evidence. Therefore, this paper provides a systematic review and a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of different COVID-19 drugs. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSCurrently, Covid-19 is one of the most urgent and significant health challenge, globally. However, so far there is no specific and effective treatment strategy against the disease. Nonetheless, there are numerous debates over the effectiveness and potential adverse effects of different COVID-19 antivirals. In general, there is invaluable need to continually report on new advances and successes against COVID-19, apparently to aid in managing the pandemic. Added value of this studyThis study provides a comprehensive, evidence-based guide on the management of multiple COVID-19 symptoms. In particular, we provide a review of 14 drugs, placebos and standard treatments against COVID 19. Meanwhile, we also performed a meta-analysis based on four clinical outcome indicators, to measure and compare the efficacy and safety of current interventions. Implications of all the available evidenceFindings of this research will guide clinical decision in COVID-19 patients. It will also provide a basis for predicting clinical outcomes such as efficacy, mortality and safety of interventions against the disease.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 94%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 93%
- Treatment Profiles And Clinical Outcomes Of COVID-19 Patients At Private Hospital In Jakarta 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the current therapeutic approaches for COVID-19: a meta-analysis 94%
- Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials of COVID-19 based on Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine 93%
- Innovative, rapid, high throughput method for drug repurposing in a pandemic - a case study of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of Corticosteroids in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
- Favipiravir for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019; a propensity score-matched cohort study 92%
- Unlocking Antiviral Potentials of Traditional Plants: A Multi-Method Computational Study against Human Metapneumovirus (HMPV) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Triage Tool of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis Aid System for Suspected COVID-19 Pneumonia in Fever Clinics 91%
- Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotic Agents in Children with COVID-19: A Rapid Review 91%
- Nosocomial Infections Among Patients with COVID-19, SARS and MERS: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 95%
- Mortality and Severity in COVID-19 Patients on ACEIs & ARBs - A Meta-Regression Analysis 95%
- Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide combined with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.