Back

Improved survival outcome in SARs-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome patients with Tocilizumab administration

Wadud, N.; Ahmed, N.; Mannu Shergil, M.; Khan, M.; Krishna, M. G.; Gilani, A.; El Zarif, S.; Galaydick, J.; Linga, K.; Koor, S.; Galea, J.; Stuczynski, L.; Osundele, M. B.

2020-05-16 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2020.05.13.20100081 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe novel human coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARs-CoV-2), was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. Hence, there is an urgency to find effective treatment. Of those patients afflicted in the United States, many have required treatment with ventilator secondary to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Data are needed regarding the benefit of treatment and prevention of the cytokine storms in COVID-19 patients with Tocilizumab. MethodsClinical outcomes data for patients admitted to Orange Regional Medical Center with confirmed COVID-19 from Mar 15, 2020 to Apr 20, 2020 were identified through electronic health record chart review. We conducted a retrospective case-control study in confirmed COVID 19 positive patients with ARDS requiring mechanical ventilation and compared outcome in terms of mortality and length of stay amongst those who received Tocilizumab as treatment modality opposed to those that did not. ResultsA total of 94 patients with COVID-19 ARDS were analyzed. 44 were in the study group and 50 in the control group. We tried to match both group as close as possible in terms of age, sex, BMI and HS score-calculated using inflammatory markers-ferritin, triglycerides, AST and fibrinogen. The median age was 55.5 years in the study group and 66 in the control group, difference was not statistically significant. Average HS score was 114 in the Tocilizumab group and 92 in the control group, difference was statistically significant with P<0.0001. Also, the patients in the study group had elevated levels of IL-6, triglycerides, AST, ferritin which were statistically significant with p < 0.0001 when compared to the control group. Length of stay was longer, average 17.9 days in the Tocilizumab. Survival rate was much lower at 48 % in the control group and 61.36 % in patients who received Tocilizumab with significant P value of < 0.00001. The number needed to treat (NNT) was 7.48, if we treat 8 patients with Tocilizumab, 1 will not die. ConclusionCytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) occurs in a large number of patients with severe COVID-19, which is also an important cause of death. IL-6 is the key molecule of CRS, so IL-6R antagonist Tocilizumab may be of value in improving outcomes. In our study Tocilizumab group seemed to have improved survival outcome. Results have to be interpreted with caution since this is a retrospective study and mortality is affected by multiple, confounding factors. We await the results of ongoing randomized controlled trials to definitely answer the question of whether Tocilizumab improves survival in COVID-19 ARDS patients.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.4%
2
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.4%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.6%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
7
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
10
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
Pan African Medical Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%