JAMA

Background: The 2026 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines replaced the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) four-tier pulmonary embolism (PE) risk scheme with five clinical categories (A-E) and subcategories. These categories were set by expert consensus and have not been validated against outcomes. How patients are reclassified relative to ESC, or how the two systems compare prognostically, is unknown. Methods: We utilized three cohorts of patients with confirmed PE using structured electronic health record data, laboratory biomarkers, and large-language-model abstraction of radiology reports: Duke University Health System (n=12,992, drawn from 95,760 consecutive inpatient CT pulmonary angiography studies, 2014-2025, with no referral or registry enrollment step between imaging and cohort entry), INSPECT (Stanford; n=3,870), and MIMIC-IV (Beth Israel Deaconess; n=361). Patients were assigned AHA/ACC categories B through E, subcategorized where data allowed, and mapped to 2019 ESC risk strata. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality; discrimination was assessed with Harrell C-index. Results: Among 17,223 patients with confirmed PE, pooled 30-day mortality rose monotonically across categories: 1.5% (B), 8.9% (C), 15.5% (D), and 31.9% (E), with the ordering preserved in all three cohorts despite differing baseline mortality. Subcategory-level discrimination was reliable only at the high-acuity extreme (D2-E2); across subcategories C1 through D1, mortality did not order monotonically (9.2%, 10.8%, 8.1%, 10.9%), and adding subcategories to category C did not improve discrimination at Duke (C-index 0.699 vs 0.699). Category C patients lacking both echocardiography and biomarker testing (12.7% of category C) had mortality (10.4%) equal to or exceeding classified peers. Relative to ESC, the frameworks were concordant at the extremes, but 5.7%of ESC intermediate-risk patients were reclassified to category D, with modestly higher but non-significant 30-day mortality than those remaining in category C (10.8% versus 8.9%). Conclusions: Across a three-health-system cohort, the 2026 AHA/ACC framework produced a reproducible mortality gradient at the category level, with added subcategory granularity refining risk chiefly at the highest-acuity tiers. Discrimination across the broad intermediate band was limited, and reclassification from ESC fell almost entirely within this range.

Background The phase 3 ADVOCATE trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Concerns raised regarding the 2019 primary endpoint adjudication process prompted a blinded, independent readjudication of all participants' primary outcomes, the results of which are described here. Methods Patients with GPA or MPA were randomized 1:1 to receive oral avacopan 30 mg twice daily or oral prednisone on a scheduled taper, each in combination with rituximab- or cyclophosphamide-based standard of care. In 2026, the Duke Clinical Research Institute Clinical Events Classification group conducted an independent, blinded committee re-adjudicated the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), relapse, and remission from weeks 26 through 52 using procedures aligned with the original adjudication charter. The primary endpoints were remission at week 26 and sustained remission at week 52. As per the original analysis plan, noninferiority and superiority were declared if the lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in the primary outcome rates between avacopan and a prednisone taper were greater than -20.0 and 0.0 percentage points, respectively. Results Among 330 participants in the intent-to-treat population, remission at week 26 was achieved by 68.1% (113/166) and 67.1% (110/164) of participants in the avacopan and prednisone taper groups, respectively, in the 2026 readjudication (adjusted difference: 2.2%; 95% CI, -7.5, 11.9), compared with 72.3% (120/166) and 70.1% (115/164) in the 2019 primary outcome adjudication (adjusted difference: 3.4%; 95% CI, -6.0, 12.8). Sustained remission at week 52 was achieved by 61.4% (102/166) and 52.4% (86/164) of participants, respectively, in the 2026 readjudication (adjusted difference: 9.8%; 95% CI, -0.3, 19.9), compared with 65.7% (109/166) and 54.9% (90/164) in the 2019 readjudication (adjusted difference: 12.5%; 95% CI, 2.6, 22.3). Concordance between the 2019 and 2026 adjudications was 95.2% for remission and 93.6% for sustained remission. Conclusion The re-analysis of ADVOCATE based on the 2026 readjudication further supports the efficacy of avacopan for GPA/MPA. Non-inferiority of avacopan versus a prednisone taper was confirmed at weeks 26 and 52 despite a median 81% reduction in glucocorticoid exposure observed in the avacopan versus prednisone taper groups. While a consistent numerical difference favoring avacopan at week 52 was observed in the 2019 and 2026 analyses, this difference did not reach statistical superiority.

We compared the immunogenicity of three licensed egg-based inactivated influenza vaccines, including TetrAnflu (Sinovac quadrivalent), Fluarix Tetra (GSK quadrivalent), and Vaxigrip (Sanofi trivalent), in adult healthcare workers in Hong Kong during the 2025/26 season. Paired pre- and post-vaccination sera from age- and sex-matched recipients (n=30 to 40 per group) were tested by hemagglutination-inhibition assays against vaccine strains. After adjustment for age, sex, and sampling interval, the vaccines induced broadly comparable rises in antibody titers, proportions achieving titers >=40, and seroconversion rates, with a superior response to A(H1N1) after TetrAnflu. These real-world findings support the interchangeability of these vaccines for influenza vaccination programs.

Background: In the United States, several states have restricted sales of flavoured tobacco products, including popular menthol- and mint-flavoured Oral Nicotine Pouches (ONP). In response, tobacco companies introduced "unflavoured" ONP containing odorless synthetic cooling agents. Since these, in turn, have become targets of legislative bans, the tobacco industry may seek out flavourants with other sensory effects to increase the appeal of "unflavoured" ONP. Methods: Online merchants were searched for "unflavored" ONP marketed to consumers in jurisdictions with flavour bans. Sensory effects of aqueous extracts from identified "heat", "spicy" and "unflavoured" ONP were analyzed by Ca2+ microfluorimetry in HEK293 cells expressing the human heat/chili pepper flavourant (capsaicinoid) receptor, hTRPV1. ONP were analyzed for capsaicinoids and sweeteners by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS). Results: A new category of "heat" or "spicy" ONP was identified, including products marketed as "unflavoured". Extracts from all these ONP robustly activated TRPV1, with "unflavoured" Lucy Heat the most potent. Chemical analysis demonstrated that Lucy Heat contained the synthetic capsaicinoid nonivamide at high levels (~675 microgram/pouch), while others contained mixtures of capsaicinoids (5-25 microgram/pouch) combined with other characterizing flavours (tropical, fruit). All tested ONP contained sweeteners. Conclusions: The tobacco industry continues to probe regulatory loopholes by claiming that newly introduced capsaicinoid flavourants and sweeteners in ONP do not represent characterizing flavours. This is contradicted by industry and regulatory determinations assigning characterizing flavour properties to these additives. The toxicological health risks of repeated capsaicinoid exposures due to ONP use, in combination with nicotine and other constituents, need to be assessed.

BackgroundObservational comparisons of former smokers who use non-combusted nicotine products with former smokers who quit without them require that two quantities be measured precisely: which product is being used, and how long ago cigarette smoking stopped. Neither quantity is recorded by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) screening instrument used in a recent Korean cohort study of post-cessation e-cigarette use and lung cancer risk. We characterized both quantities in a contemporaneous, nationally representative survey of the same population. MethodsWe analyzed the public-release microdata of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2018 to 2023, restricted to adults aged 19 years and older. Former smokers were identified by smoking status, and cessation duration was taken from the item recording months since the last cigarette. Former smokers currently using a heated tobacco product (HTP) or an e-cigarette (EC) were compared with former smokers using neither. KNHANES 2018 asked a generic e-cigarette question and, separately, a checklist naming HTP brands, allowing the two product classes to be separated. Distributions were compared with rank-based methods, the age-duration relationship with Theil-Sen regression, and residual imbalance by restricting the comparison group to respondents age-matched to within two years. ResultsThe 2018 analytic sample comprised 1,348 former smokers, of whom 43 currently used HTP or EC and 1,305 used neither. Among the product-using former smokers, 58% reported HTP use without e-cigarette use, 21% reported both, and 21% reported e-cigarette use without HTP use; 79% reported any HTP use. Median cessation duration was 0.7 years (IQR 0.25 to 1.5) among product users and 12.0 years (IQR 5.0 to 20.0) among those using neither (Kolmogorov- Smirnov D = 0.76, P < 0.001), with the product user having quit more recently in 92% of cross-group pairs. The separation persisted within the short-term (<5 year) stratum (D = 0.34, P < 0.001; 73% of pairs) and after age matching, where the residual gap was 9.3 years. Cessation duration rose with age among those using no product (Theil-Sen slope +0.30 years per year) but was flat among product users (-0.01). Restricting to the screening-eligible stratum used in the cohorts high-risk analysis did not attenuate the imbalance: among those aged 50 to 80, median cessation among no-product quitters rose to 15.5 years (n = 858), and adding a 20 pack-year criterion left 421 no-product quitters with a median of 11.0 years against three HTP/EC users who had quit 0.25, 1.0 and 2.0 years earlier, despite closely matched cumulative exposure (mean 37.6 vs 37.7 pack-years). The overall contrast reproduced in every wave from 2018 to 2023, with an age-matched residual of 9 to 11 years. ConclusionsIn a nationally representative survey of the same population and the same calendar year as the NHIS screening cohort analyzed by Kim et al., Korean former smokers using non-combusted nicotine products differed from other former smokers in two respects that bear directly on how such comparisons should be read. First, they were predominantly HTP users: 79% reported any HTP use, and only 21% reported e-cigarette use without HTP use. Second, they had stopped smoking approximately a decade more recently, a difference that survived stratification at five years and exact age matching. Neither quantity is recorded in the NHIS screening instrument. Cohort estimates comparing post-cessation product users with other quitters should therefore be interpreted with caution if they do not precisely characterize product composition and to time since cessation, and future studies should measure both directly.

Objective: We examined whether perceived stress and sleep quality mediate the association between social support and later cognition among adults in the United States. Methods: We used longitudinal Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) data. Social support (1995-1996) was modeled as a latent construct indicated by family and friend support. Perceived stress and sleep quality were measured in the MIDUS 2 Biomarker Project (2004-2009), and cognition was assessed in MIDUS 2 and MIDUS 3. Structural equation models evaluated parallel indirect pathways, adjusting for MIDUS 2 cognition and covariates. Results: Higher social support was associated with lower perceived stress ({beta}=-0.32, 95% CI:-0.41, -0.23) and better sleep quality ({beta}=-0.25, 95% CI:-0.35, -0.15). Greater perceived stress was associated with lower cognition ({beta}=-0.06, 95% CI:-0.11, -0.01), whereas sleep quality was not associated with cognition. Direct and total social support-cognition associations were not statistically significant. A small positive indirect association through perceived stress was identified ({beta}=0.02, 95% CI:0.00, 0.04); no indirect association through sleep quality was identified. Conclusions: Findings are consistent with a possible psychosocial pathway through perceived stress, although the effect was modest and total and direct associations were not statistically significant. Sleep quality showed no statistically significant indirect association.

Introduction: Severe hypercholesterolemia has four primary causes: monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), polygenic hypercholesterolemia (PRS), severely elevated Lp(a) concentration, and hypercholesterolemia due to environmental/lifestyle/behavioral factors (i.e., no known genetic etiology). Here, we explore patient and clinician perspectives about the identification and management of each of these causes. Methods: Patients with severe hypercholesterolemia with a primary language of English or Spanish and clinicians (primary care, genetic counseling, cardiology) across two health systems (Geisinger, Mount Sinai) participated in semi-structured interviews. Analysis was completed using an a priori codebook informed by Proctor?s implementation outcomes to identify themes influencing the identification and management of the underlying causes of severe hypercholesterolemia. Results: A total of 28 patients and 25 clinicians participated. Patients emphasized the importance of receiving results directly from their clinician, requested take-home resources that mirrored the information from their clinician, were motivated to seek multidisciplinary care, and anticipated all results would be actionable, but that high-risk PRS and elevated Lp(a) may require more support (e.g., specialists, education) to act on. Clinicians stressed the importance of integrating workflows (e.g., test ordering) with the electronic health record, highlighted LDL-C levels and multidisciplinary care coordination as key to management, explained how they would tailor care to individual patients, and expressed a more limited understanding of Lp(a) and PRS result types based on their clinical experiences and, therefore, hesitation about the recommended clinical actions. Conclusions: Patients and clinicians identified complementary determinants influencing the identification and management of the underlying cause of severe hypercholesterolemia. Participants welcomed risk information and requested a higher level of informational support and specialty expertise to appropriately manage high Lp(a) and PRS results. Integrating genomic information into risk assessments will require a partnership between general practitioners and specialists to provide a multidisciplinary approach to the identification and management of the underlying causes of severe hypercholesterolemia.

Seasonal influenza remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although neuraminidase inhibitors improve outcomes, influenza-related deaths persist. We evaluated the impact of early aspirin (ASA) and non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use on outcomes in adults hospitalized with influenza. This retrospective study included adults admitted to the University of Minnesota Medical Center from 2016 to 2018. Continuous variables were summarized as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and categorical variables as counts and percentages. Group comparisons used Wilcoxon rank-sum, Chi-square, or Fishers exact tests. Analyses included case-control comparisons, assessments by vaccination status, and subgroup analyses by early ASA or NSAID use. Among 2,816 patients, 320 had laboratory-confirmed influenza, with vaccination less common among cases. Unvaccinated patients had higher rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (23.6% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.003) and ventilatory support (15.0% vs. 6.1%; P = 0.009). In vaccinated patients, early ASA use was associated with older age and higher in-hospital mortality, whereas early NSAID use was associated with no in-hospital deaths, better one- and three-year survival (P < 0.001), and fewer, though not statistically significant, cardiovascular complications. In unvaccinated patients, ASA use was associated with lower three-year survival (59.1% vs. 79.2%; P = 0.013), while NSAID use was associated with fewer ICU admissions and no cardiovascular or renal complications. In both vaccinated and unvaccinated adults hospitalized with influenza, early NSAID use was associated with improved survival and fewer complications, whereas ASA use was associated with worse outcomes.

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) disproportionately burdens underserved communities, where social determinants of health (SDOH) perpetuate persistent disparities. Family-based interventions leveraging social support represent a promising yet understudied approach. We describe the rationale, design, and methods of the Skills-based Educational strategies for the Reduction of Vascular Events in Orange County (SERVE OC) RCT and present baseline characteristics of enrolled families. Methods: SERVE OC is a 2-arm RCT of 190 Latino and Vietnamese families (486 individuals) randomized to the family-based intervention or individual self-management. The intervention was grounded in social network theory while employing community engaged strategies. Primary outcomes include achieving ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) defined by AHA Life's Essential 8 (LE8) and systolic blood pressure reduction at 12, 24, and 36 months. Baseline assessments include demographics, LE8, psychosocial factors, food security, and SDOH. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses examined cohort characteristics and associations between SDOH, food security, and LE8. Results: Over 83% of participants had suboptimal LE8 scores. Average adult total LE8 scores were 66.61 {plus minus}11.96, with physical activity as the weakest domain, compared to an average of 76.52{plus minus}10.15 in children. Greater SDOH burden and food security were associated with significantly lower odds of ideal CVH and lower LE8 scores respectively. Conclusions: SERVE OC demonstrates the feasibility of enrolling families in community-engaged RCT targeting CVD disparities in underserved population. Baseline findings confirm substantial CVD risk and SDOH burden underscoring the need for multi-level, culturally tailored interventions. Trials results will inform scalable, family-focused strategies for CVD prevention across the life course. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique Identifier: NCT05641519.

Background: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening reduces lung cancer mortality but is limited by low uptake and associated with high rates of false-positives and indeterminate-nodules. Breath volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis is a non-invasive candidate biomarker approach that could complement LDCT, but prior work has relied on laboratory-based high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), limiting point-of-care deployment. Methods: In this pilot study, breath samples were collected from 40 patients with treatment-naive, pathologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 25 lung-cancer-screening-eligible healthy controls. Paired samples were analyzed via a compact point-of-care GC-MS platform (CLARION) and a laboratory HRMS reference. Diagnostic classification models were built independently for each platform using elastic net logistic regression with leave-one-out cross-validation, and performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: CLARION identified 103 VOCs across breath specimens, compared to over 900 identified by HRMS. Despite this difference in panel size, CLARION achieved diagnostic performance nearly identical to HRMS for distinguishing NSCLC cases from controls (AUC 0.864 vs. 0.863). Compared to controls, performance statistics were similar for early-stage NSCLC (AUC 0.854 vs. 0.841) and adenocarcinoma (AUC 0.770 vs. 0.787). VOCs of interest include p-cymene, phenol, propylbenzene, tetradecane, {beta}-ocimene, 2,3-dihydro-indole, and 1-methylthio-(Z)-1-propene. Conclusion: A compact, point-of-care breath GC-MS platform achieved diagnostic performance for NSCLC detection comparable to a laboratory HRMS reference despite a substantially smaller detected VOC panel. These findings support continued development of point-of-care breath VOC testing as a non-invasive, field-deployable complement to LDCT-based lung cancer screening.

Background: The nicotine analog 6-methyl nicotine (6-MN) has appeared in commercial e-cigarette liquids, and other products, spurring interest in determining the extent to which it conveys similar effects to those of nicotine. Objective: To determine if 6-MN acts like nicotine to decrease body temperature, decrease nociception, suppress wheel activity and reinforce operant behavior when delivered by vapor inhalation using an Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS; "e-cigarette") approach in a rat model. Methods: Male and female (N=8 per sex) young adult Sprague-Dawley rats were evaluated for rectal temperature and nociceptive responses (warm water tail-withdrawal) to the inhalation of vapor from (-)-6-MN or (-)-nicotine in concentrations ranging from 5-30 mg/mL in the propylene glycol vehicle. Rats were then assessed for the reinforcing effects of nicotine and 6-MN using a vapor self-administration procedure and the rate suppressing effects of nicotine and 6-MN on wheel activity following injection. Results: Inhalation of nicotine or 6-MN for 30 minutes decreased the rectal temperature and increased tail-withdrawal latency of female and male rats in a concentration-dependent manner. The magnitude of the effects of 6-MN and nicotine were similar at similar vapor concentrations. Operant responding for 6-MN vapor was increased by pre-treatment with the antagonist mecamylamine. 6-MN was more potent than nicotine at suppressing wheel activity after injection. Conclusions: 6-MN induces effects very similar to those of nicotine, at a similar potency when inhaled and at a slightly increased potency when injected.

Background: Many at-risk patients lack access to genetic services due to a genetic counselor (GC) workforce shortage. Little is known about how digital alternatives impact patients with and without cancer who meet criteria for genetic testing. Methods: eREACH2 is a randomized 4-arm non-inferiority trial where pre-test (visit 1) and/or return of results (visit 2) GC counseling was replaced with a patient-centered digital intervention. Arms include: A (GC/GC), B (GC/digital), C (digital/GC) and D (digital/digital). Primary outcomes were non-inferiority in uptake of genetic services and change in genetic knowledge and general anxiety from baseline to post-disclosure of results (T0-T2). Secondary cognitive and affective outcomes were assessed using non-inferiority ANOVAs and equivalency chi-squared tests in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Findings: 773 participants were recruited nationwide; 46.6% from rural areas. Mean age was 51 years (range 20-87), 13% male, 12% non-white, 29% had less than a college education, and 33% had a personal history of cancer. 584 (76%) patients completed testing (14% had a positive result, 16% had a VUS). In the primary ITT analyses, we met the non-inferiority for uptake of genetic services and anxiety, but results were inconclusive for knowledge. Secondary outcomes were heterogeneous across arms. Arm C demonstrated consistently favorable effects, while Arms B and D showed less favorable outcomes in select domains (e.g. satisfaction and MICRA). Patients who received positive or VUS results via digital disclosure had significantly higher MICRA scores - indicating greater negative response to testing. Interpretation: In this large, randomized trial of patients with and without cancer, the eREACH intervention was effective for pre-test counseling, but inconclusive for digital disclosure of results. Exploratory analyses suggest that digital delivery could be a reasonable alternative for individuals receiving negative results, while those receiving positive or VUS results may derive some short-term psychosocial benefit from GC disclosure.

Objectives To evaluate whether access to a certified large language model (LLM)-based clinical decision support system improves physician diagnostic performance in rheumatology compared with conventional diagnostic resources alone. Methods In this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, 82 physicians from seven hospitals in two countries were randomised 1:1 to conventional diagnostic resources plus Prof. Valmed or conventional resources alone. Participants assessed three rheumatology vignettes before and after assistance. The primary outcome was top-1 diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes included top-3 accuracy, diagnostic reasoning, confidence, case-processing time and perceived support quality. Results Top-1 accuracy increased from 22.2% to 33.3% in the intervention group and from 23.3% to 35.0% in the control group, with no between-group difference in improvement (adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.19; p=0.979). Differences in top-3 accuracy, diagnostic reasoning and confidence were also not significant. Assisted case-processing time was substantially shorter with LLM support (94 vs 206 s; adjusted mean difference -112 s, 95% CI -141 to -83; p<0.001). Information timeliness and perceived diagnostic support quality were rated significantly higher in the intervention group. Exploratory analyses showed persistent overconfidence and substantial AI over-reliance. Conclusions Certified LLM-based diagnostic support did not improve diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional resources, but substantially reduced case-processing time and improved perceived support quality. These findings suggest potential workflow benefits while highlighting overconfidence and over-reliance as important safety considerations.

Background: Clinician-scientists translate clinical observation into discovery, trials, and policy, yet this workforce is shrinking across health systems worldwide. Integrated MB-PhD training, pausing medical training to complete a PhD before clinical exposure or specialisation, is one route into this career. We aimed to evaluate the long-term value of MB-PhD training and the barriers to clinical-academic careers these face after graduation. Methods: We evaluated all 131 graduates (29.8% female) who entered the University College London (UCL) MB-PhD programme over a 25-year period (1994-2018). Bibliometric outputs were collated via an inter-linked information system. Concurrently, all 131 graduates were invited to respond to open-ended questions on career benefits and structural barriers; 99 (75.6%) responded, and responses were independently coded into themes, which were then reviewed and confirmed by a Study Group of 107 individuals, including the 91 respondents who agreed to participate further. Results: Graduates produced 5,877 publications (1,141 first-author, 819 corresponding-author), attracting 350,754 citations, with a mean relative citation ratio of 3.30 {+/-} 0.47, approximately three times the field average and sustained across three decades of programme entry. Graduates secured an estimated $157.55 million across 99 grants, released 465 public datasets, and were named investigators on 31 clinical trials across five continents. Among the 99 survey respondents, 49.5% held consultant-grade posts, 72.7% remained research-active, and 25.3% had reached senior academic grade. Open-ended responses were coded into five recurring structural barriers, subsequently confirmed by the Study Group: insufficient protected research time (72.2% of responses), unsupportive training structures and limited career opportunities (36.7%, 24.4% of responses), funding and pay barriers (22.2% of responses), and lack of mentorship or geographical/family constraints (14.4%, 13.3% of responses). Conclusions: Integrated MB-PhD training generates sustained academic productivity and leadership, but structural barriers threaten retention of graduates within clinical-academic careers. Protecting research time, stabilising funding and pay, and reducing geographic instability are needed to retain the clinician-scientists that health systems have already invested in training.

Background. In Europe, first-trimester combined screening with the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm identifies women at increased risk of preeclampsia who may benefit from personalized aspirin prophylaxis. However, a substantial proportion of early-onset preeclampsia (EOPE) remains undetected at clinically acceptable specificity. Objective. To evaluate the first-trimester performance of MaiRa for early-onset preeclampsia (EOPE) risk stratification by benchmarking it against FMF screening in the same women, characterizing discordant patient-level classification profiles and exploring potential implementation strategies. Study Design. This secondary case-control analysis was nested within the prospective, multicentre PREMOM cohort [NCT04990141], which enrolled women with singleton pregnancies across 14 tertiary hospitals in Spain. First-trimester MaiRa and FMF risk estimates were evaluated in the same 126 pregnant women, comprising 99 uncomplicated controls and 27 EOPE cases, defined by disease onset before 34 weeks. Discrimination was compared using a stratified paired bootstrap analysis of the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves. Performance was assessed at prespecified clinical thresholds, and detection rates were evaluated at fixed false-positive rates. Universal and contingent MaiRa implementation strategies were also evaluated. Results. MaiRa showed greater first-trimester discrimination for EOPE than FMF combined screening (AUC, 0.974 vs 0.900; P=.040) and consistently achieved higher detection rates across fixed false-positive rates. At false-positive rates of 5% and 10%, MaiRa detected 85.2% and 92.6% of EOPE cases, compared with 44.4% and 70.4% for FMF, respectively. Patient-level analysis demonstrated that MaiRa identified 12 of 27 EOPE cases (44.4%) classified as low risk by FMF; these pregnancies generally exhibited less abnormal conventional first-trimester profiles, including fewer maternal risk factors, lower mean arterial pressure and lower uterine artery pulsatility index, yet 8 of 12 (66.7%) subsequently developed severe EOPE. Exploratory implementation analyses showed that universal MaiRa screening achieved the highest EOPE detection, whereas a contingent strategy using FMF for triage and reflex MaiRa testing reduced molecular testing to 35.7% of pregnancies while maintaining 77.8% sensitivity and 97.0% specificity. Conclusion. MaiRa provided greater first-trimester discrimination for EOPE than conventional combined screening and detected additional pregnancies that later developed severe disease despite less abnormal conventional screening profiles. The findings suggest that maternal plasma cfRNA profiling captures biological alterations not fully reflected by combined first-trimester screening and support further prospective evaluation in an independent, unselected obstetric population. Key words: early-onset preeclampsia; first-trimester screening; cell-free RNA; liquid biopsy; Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm; combined screening; risk stratification; aspirin prophylaxis.

Background Ambient AI documentation tools, known as scribes, are entering routine clinical practice at scale, but the evidence comparing the notes they produce against clinician-written notes is dominated by single-site, single-language studies that rely on human review to find errors, a method known to miss most documentation errors. Methods We conducted a paired simulation across five countries and languages (Cambridge/English, Barcelona/Spanish, Milan/Italian, Paris/French, Cologne/German; 385 paired consultations, 770 notes). From each actor-performed consultation, an AI scribe (Heidi) and a junior-to-middle-grade clinician independently produced a note. Notes were scored on the PDQI-9 by evaluators blinded to authorship. Documentation errors were identified by two methods of deliberately different sensitivity - clinician adjudication, and a calibrated automated reviewer externally validated against a blinded ten-clinician panel - then graded for clinical risk by a three-model panel. The co-primary outcomes were PDQI-9 total and Critical+High error burden, the latter reported under both detection arms. The analysis plan was registered before any pooling across sites. Results AI notes scored higher than clinician notes on the PDQI-9 (40.6 vs 35.6; difference +5.08, 95% CI 4.6-5.6; Cohen dz=0.55), consistently across all five sites (dz 0.41-0.75), and were less dispersed (5.7% of AI vs 27.8% of clinician notes fell below the study pre-specified low-score threshold (<32)). On the principal safety outcome - the paired probability that a note carried [&ge;]Critical+High error - clinician notes were affected more often under both detection arms: 61.0% versus 24.4% by the calibrated reviewer (relative risk 2.50, 95% CI 2.09-3.00) and 21.8% versus 6.2% by clinician adjudication (relative risk 3.50, 95% CI 2.32-5.27). The difference was largest for omissions. Unaided clinician review identified roughly 12% of the errors the calibrated reviewer retained, and a smaller fraction in AI notes than in clinician notes. Conclusions In this simulation, AI-generated notes scored higher on documentation quality, varied less, and carried fewer clinically significant errors than notes written on the same consultations by junior-to-middle-grade clinicians. The magnitude of the safety difference depends on the sensitivity of error detection, so we report both detection regimes and bound rather than point-estimate the absolute error rate. Extension to live practice, consultant-authored documentation, and notes as filed after clinician editing remains to be established.

Purpose: Adults with high- or very high-risk acute leukemia (AL) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) face substantial relapse risk after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. We evaluated single-unit cord blood (CB) transplantation after ex vivo expansion with UM171 in this population. Patients and Methods: Two prospective, single-arm phase II trials at four centers enrolled 64 adults with high- or very high-risk AL or MDS; 60 received a UM171-expanded CB transplant and comprised the analysis population. CB units were preferentially selected at a 5/8 HLA match to maximize the graft versus leukemia effect. Patients received intermediate- or high-intensity conditioning with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Endpoints included safety, feasibility, non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), GVHD, GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS), chronic GVHD-free relapse free survival (CRFS). Results: Thirty-two percent of patients had undergone previous transplantation, 17% of patients with AL were not in remission and 24% of those with AML/MDS had TP53 mutations. Of 62 patients who remained eligible for transplantation, 60 had a graft successfully manufactured and infused. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 17 and 38 days, respectively. NRM was 5.1% at day 100 and 15.2% at 1 year. Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 22.3%. Two-year OS and RFS were 63.9% and 60.4%, respectively. Grade III-IV acute GVHD incidence was 20.3% at 1 year and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD incidence was 6.8% at 2 years. Conclusion: UM171-expanded CB transplantation was feasible and provided prompt engraftment, durable disease control, and infrequent clinically significant chronic GVHD in adults with high- and very high-risk AL/MDS. Comparative studies are warranted to define its role relative to contemporary donor platforms.

Objective. Formal large language model (LLM) evaluations score isolated prompts, but clinicians and health-informatics researchers meet model failures inside multi-step workflows where erroneous output can alter procedures or contaminate documents. We present TRACE (Tracking Reliability of AI-generated Conversational Evidence), a practitioner-audit framework for evaluating the downstream workflow reliability of conversational AI. Materials and Methods. A method paper with an empirical demonstration: 45 documentation-positive incidents recorded by one clinician-informatician across scholarly, clinical informatics, and clinical-adjacent workflows over seven weeks, coded with a consequence-based severity rubric, an error definition, a taxonomy crosswalk, and a Response-Audit Scorecard. Three reviewer-authors independently coded a 16-incident subsample; three vendor-blinded AI comparators applied the taxonomy to all 45 incidents. Results. Four categories tied as most frequent: verification failure, factual numerical error, tool-behavior misunderstanding, and citation or reference formatting (n=7 each). Four workflow-harm patterns recurred: procedural propagation, documentary contamination, trust-calibration disruption, and user-borne corrective burden, and one incident carried an estimated $2500 impact. Category agreement across three human reviewer-authors was low (Fleiss {kappa}=0.155), whereas three AI comparators agreed substantially (Fleiss {kappa}=0.632), suggesting taxonomy legibility under standardized conditions even where human judgment diverged. Discussion. Category assignment is comparatively legible, whereas severity and claimed-verification remain judgment-dependent. The claimed-verification gap is a measurable failure mode distinct from hallucination, sycophancy, and over-refusal. Conclusion. Practitioner audits with structured response scoring complement benchmarks by documenting workflow harm as an applied evaluation unit for clinical informatics and public-health work; this is a pilot that motivates, not estimates, error rates or cross-model comparisons.

Doctors increasingly rely on AI in the clinic, yet which report features make AI-generated responses useful and trustworthy remains unclear. In this randomized mixed-methods study, 34 oncology physicians provided 294 ratings of four blinded AI systems across five vignettes, alongside 20 semi-structured interviews analyzed with a prespecified LLM-assisted qualitative pipeline. Despite similar references, an evidence-graded report adapted from OpenEvidence was rated significantly lower in overall utility than standard OpenEvidence (mean difference, -0.96; 95% CI, -1.26 to -0.66; P<.001). Qualitative analysis identified six themes and seven design requirements. Oncologists valued rapid orientation, evidence retrieval, and verification, preferring concise, scannable reports with quantitative outcomes, recognizable bolded guidelines, explicit uncertainty, and verifiable citations. Trust deteriorated with citation mismatch, buried provenance, evidence misclassification, overconfident recommendations, and poor organization. Evidence presented differently can alter perceptions of clinical utility and trust; accuracy alone is insufficient, and report design must also be empirically evaluated.

IMPORTANCE: A recent meta-analysis showed that chemoimmunotherapy was associated with improved overall survival (OS) compared with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) [&ge;] 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether this benefit reflects chemotherapy effect or ICI heterogeneity remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To reassess the survival benefit of adding chemotherapy to ICI monotherapy using agent-stratified comparisons anchored to chemotherapy. DATA SOURCES: The 24 phase 3 randomized clinical trials included in the original meta-analysis (search date, August 3, 2025). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted from each trial in the original meta-analysis. Two analytic frameworks were used: within-agent comparisons (same ICI in both chemoimmunotherapy and monotherapy) and across-agent comparisons (ICI in one treatment strategy only). For within-agent comparisons, a two-stage random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. In stage 1, ICI-specific HRs for chemoimmunotherapy and ICI monotherapy versus chemotherapy were pooled and their ratio was calculated (RHR = HRchemoimmuno/HRmono; RHR < 1 favors chemoimmunotherapy). The RHRs were pooled in stage 2. For across-agent comparisons, RHR was derived from pooled HRs by treatment strategy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Endpoints were OS and PFS. RESULTS: In within-agent comparisons (4 ICIs; 13 trials; N = 3252), pooled RHR was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.78-1.13; P = .48; I2 = 0.0%) for OS and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.68-1.06; P = .14; I2 = 0.0%) for PFS. In across-agent comparisons (7 ICIs; 11 trials; N = 2231), RHR favored chemoimmunotherapy for OS (0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.92; P = .01) and PFS (0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.58; P < .001). In a sensitivity analysis restricted to trials of NCCN-recommended regimens, pooled RHR was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.81-1.28; P = .87) for OS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the within-agent comparisons, adding chemotherapy to ICI monotherapy did not improve OS or PFS in patients with PD-L1 TPS [&ge;] 50% advanced NSCLC. The benefit in the original meta-analysis appears driven by across-ICI heterogeneity. These findings are consistent with ICI monotherapy as a standard first-line option and underscore the need for agent-level stratification in across-trial comparisons.