Back

Bridging the Coverage Gap: State Medicaid Limitations for Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs and the Risk to Disadvantaged Communities

Henson, J. C.; Spears, G. L.; Daughdrill, B. K.; Hagood, J. N.; Vallurupalli, S.

2026-04-05 health policy
10.64898/2026.04.03.26350136 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a cost-effective, evidence-based intervention that improves outcomes for patients with heart failure (HF), yet access remains inequitable, particularly among Medicaid enrollees. This study evaluates the state-by-state variability in Medicaid coverage for CR services and examines the implications for health equity in vulnerable populations. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional policy analysis of all 50 U.S. states to assess Medicaid coverage for outpatient CR services billed under CPT codes 93797 (without ECG monitoring) and 93798 (with ECG monitoring). Publicly available Medicaid documents were reviewed and supplemented with direct communication with state Medicaid agencies. States were categorized into full, partial/inconclusive, or no coverage. Geographic trends were visualized through heat maps and contextualized using state-level Medicaid enrollment data. Results: Marked disparities in CR coverage were identified. Only 41 states reimbursed for CPT 93797, and 43 for CPT 93798. Eight states lacked coverage for either code, predominantly in the South and Mountain West, including Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, and Utah. States with the highest Medicaid enrollment (e.g., Louisiana, Arkansas) often provided no CR coverage, compounding access barriers for high-risk, low-income populations. Conclusions: The absence of standardized Medicaid coverage for CR contributes to systemic inequities in cardiovascular care, disproportionately impacting disadvantaged communities. Aligning Medicaid policies to ensure universal CR access--particularly through tele-rehabilitation and value-based care models--could reduce hospitalizations, improve survival, and promote health equity across the U.S.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.4%
2
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
8
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%