Back

Primary Care Obesity Management at the Threshold of the GLP-1 Era: A Survey-Based Change Readiness Assessment

Ales, M. W.; Larrison, C. D.; Rodrigues, S. B.

2026-04-03 primary care research
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349998 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background Between 2021 and 2022, primary care obesity management was entering the early diffusion phase of newer anti obesity pharmacotherapy, as GLP1 based treatments began reshaping expectations. However, it was unclear whether primary care clinicians and practice environments were prepared to deliver comprehensive obesity care. (1,2) Methods In 2021 to 2022, we surveyed 276 clinicians from three cohorts: an opt-in national physician panel (Cohort A), clinicians from an integrated health system (Cohort B), and clinicians from a rural accountable care organization (Cohort C). The survey, informed by formative patient and physician focus groups conducted in 2021, assessed current and desired competence, attitudes, confidence, perceived forces for change, and barriers to obesity care. Analyses were descriptive (means and standard deviations). Results Across cohorts, desired competence exceeded current competence. The largest gaps involved recommending behavioral interventions, developing comprehensive care plans, and providing ongoing obesity management support. Attitudes toward obesity care were generally favorable, while confidence that current practices reflected best practice was only moderate. Professional and personal forces for change were moderate, patient driven motivators were moderate to high, whereas social (peer/organizational) reinforcement was weak. Reported barriers extended beyond knowledge deficits to include patient engagement, competing demands, cost, and practical constraints. Conclusions At the threshold of the GLP1 era, primary care clinicians were motivated to improve obesity care but lacked consistent support to deliver comprehensive management. The relative absence of peer and organizational reinforcement suggests that readiness for change reflected not only individual knowledge and attitudes, but also the degree of peer and organizational reinforcement that supports comprehensive obesity care in routine practice.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
2
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
6
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
9
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
19
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
25
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%