Back

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cesarean Delivery Across Insurance Types, United States, 2014-2024

Akinyemi, O.; Fasokun, M.; Singleton, D.; Ogunyankin, F.; Khalil, S.; Gordon, K.; Michael, M.; Hughes, K.; Luo, G.; Lawson, S.; Ahizechukwu, E.

2026-04-06 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.04.04.26350151 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Cesarean delivery accounts for nearly one-third of U.S. births and is associated with substantial maternal morbidity and health care costs. Persistent racial disparities have been documented, yet the structural factors contributing to these differences remain incompletely understood. The extent to which insurance coverage shapes racial disparities in cesarean delivery remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the independent and interactive associations of race/ethnicity and insurance coverage with cesarean delivery in the United States. Methods Population-based retrospective cohort study using singleton live births recorded in the United States Vital Statistics Natality files from 2014 to 2024. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the independent effects of race/ethnicity and insurance status on cesarean delivery, including interaction terms to test effect modification, using national birth certificate data. Models were adjusted for maternal demographics, clinical factors, and temporal covariates. Adjusted odds ratios, predicted probabilities, and absolute risk differences were derived from post-estimation marginal effects. The main outcome measure was cesarean delivery (yes vs no). Results Among 41,543,568 deliveries from 2014 to 2024, 13,312,221 (32.0%) were cesarean deliveries. After adjustment, both race and ethnicity and insurance status were independently associated with cesarean delivery. Compared with non-Hispanic White women, non-Hispanic Black women had higher odds of cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.22-1.23). Relative to uninsured women, those with private insurance had 59% higher odds of cesarean delivery (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.58-1.60). Significant interaction effects were observed, indicating that insurance coverage modified racial and ethnic differences in cesarean delivery. Non-Hispanic Black women had the highest predicted probabilities across all insurance categories, with the largest absolute disparities observed among uninsured women. Conclusion Racial and ethnic differences in cesarean delivery persist in the United States and are modified by insurance coverage, suggesting that coverage-related differences may contribute to inequities in obstetric care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
10
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
15
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
22
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
27
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
30
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%