Addiction

BackgroundPractical alcohol risk-reduction strategies are widely recommended in public-facing alcohol guidance, but randomized evidence from socially interactive drinking episodes remains limited. We conducted a pilot cluster randomized trial to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of a package intervention comprising practical drinking-strategy information, participant self-selection of same-day strategies, and a brief commitment declaration in a social drinking laboratory. MethodsThis single-center, parallel-group pilot trial was conducted in Japan. Pre-existing social groups participated. One or two groups scheduled in the same session slot were combined into a time-slot allocation unit, which was randomized 1:1 either to the package intervention or to alcohol-related knowledge only. The primary outcome was total pure alcohol intake during the first 120 min. Session satisfaction on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was a prespecified secondary participant-experience outcome. ResultsOf 83 interested individuals, 63 were randomized and 59 participants in 17 social groups and 12 allocation units were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The mean paired intervention-control difference for 120-min alcohol intake was-8.84 g (95% confidence interval [CI]-27.92 to 10.23; exact sign-flip p = 0.281). The corresponding exploratory 0-30 min difference was-4.90 g (95% CI-10.48 to 0.68; exact sign-flip p = 0.094). In a genotype-adjusted participant-level sensitivity analysis, the intervention coefficient for 120-min intake was-16.0 g (95% CI-30.9 to-1.1; p = 0.036). Session satisfaction was high in both arms with no clear between-arm difference. Next-day follow-up was 100%, and no adverse-event-related discontinuations occurred. ConclusionsThe intervention was feasible to deliver in a socially interactive drinking setting, and session satisfaction was high in both arms. Primary allocation-unit estimates favored lower alcohol intake but were imprecise. Larger trials are needed to estimate effects more precisely, while considering the potential influence of genotype imbalance on effect estimation in East Asian samples. Trial registrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000060685. Registered 17 February 2026.

Substance use disorders run in families, yet the mechanisms underlying intergenerational transmission remain unclear. We investigated indirect genetic effects, pathways through which parental genotypes influence offspring phenotypes via the family environment, for alcohol use disorder (AUD), nicotine dependence (ND), and related quantitative outcomes, and aimed to identify family environmental factors through which such effects may operate. Using transmitted and non-transmitted polygenic scores (PGS) constructed for problematic alcohol use, tobacco use disorder, and general addiction liability, we analyzed 5972 European-ancestry adult offspring with at least one genotyped parent from the population-based Lifelines cohort (Netherlands). Offspring outcomes included lifetime DSM-5 AUD diagnosis, AUD symptom count, maximum drinks in 24 hours, Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence score, and cigarettes per day. AUD findings were meta-analyzed with data from the Brisbane Longitudinal Twin Study (N = 1368; Australia). We also examined parent-of-origin effects and mediation by parental substance use and socioeconomic status using structural equation modeling. Transmitted PGS robustly predicted all AUD and ND outcomes ({beta} = 0.07-0.16; OR = 1.20 for AUD diagnosis). Non-transmitted PGS, indexing indirect genetic effects, were negligible for all clinical syndrome outcomes. The only significant indirect genetic effect was on cigarettes per day ({beta} = 0.03, p = 0.01), mediated by parental smoking behavior but not socioeconomic status. These findings indicate that intergenerational transmission of risk for AUD and ND is driven primarily by direct genetic effects, with modest indirect genetic effects on smoking quantity. Larger samples and cross-trait analyses are needed to further elucidate these mechanisms.

Objectives: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and self-harming sexual behaviours share functional and behavioural overlaps. However, the relationship between NSSI and problematic sexual behaviour (PSB) remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the association between NSSI and PSB in two cohorts - a non-clinical university cohort and a clinical PSB patient cohort. Methods: Data were collected from 2,189 university participants and 477 clinical PSB patients. NSSI was assessed via self-report, and PSB was measured with the Sexual Addiction Screening Test-Revised (SAST-R) Core. The four core addictive dimensions of PSB: relationship disturbance, loss of control, preoccupation, and affect disturbance, were also evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between PSB (presence/absence and severity) and NSSI, looking at effects of gender and contributions of addictive dimensions of PSB. Results: Rates of NSSI were similar in the university (7.1%) and patient (5.7%) cohorts; stratified by gender, a higher proportion of women PSB patients had NSSI compared to in the university cohort (29.3% vs 9.3%). In the university group, who had milder PSB than patients, PSB was associated with NSSI (OR=2.11, p<0.001); a significant gender by PSB interaction was found showing that women with PSB were over four times more likely to have NSSI than men without PSB (OR=4.44, p=0.037). In contrast, PSB severity was not associated with NSSI in PSB patients (OR=1.10, p=0.25). Associations of the addictive dimensions of PSB with NSSI were observed only in the subgroup of university women, in the 'preoccupation' dimension (p<0.001). Conclusions: Our findings highlight gender-specific patterns in the association between PSB and NSSI, suggesting the need for further research and possibly targeted prevention and intervention strategies in women.

BackgroundSustained retention in care supports continuous access to antiretroviral therapy, routine clinical monitoring, and long-term viral suppression. ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of interventions for improving retention in care among people living with HIV (PLHIV). DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis Data sourcesPubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from 1995 to December 2024. Eligibility criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions to improve retention in care, viral load suppression, or quality of life (QoL) among PLHIV, compared with standard of care (SoC) or other interventions. Data extraction and synthesisPairs of reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using ROBUST-RCT. We conducted a fixed-effect frequentist network meta-analysis and rated interventions categories relative to SoC based on effect estimates effects and the certainty of evidence.. Dichotomous outcomes were summarized as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs) with 95% CI. ResultsEighty-four trials enrolling 107 137 PLHIV evaluated 13 intervention categories. For retention in care, five interventions supported by moderate or high certainty evidence proved superior to SoC: multi-month dispensing (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.09), task shifting (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.42 to 2.66), differentiated service delivery (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.76), behavioural counselling (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.54), and supportive interventions (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.55). For viral load suppression, two interventions supported by moderate or high certainty evidence proved superior to SoC: task shifting (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.43) and behavioural counselling (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.67). Across outcomes, no intervention demonstrated convincing superiority over other active interventions. ConclusionsAmong 13 intervention categories, only a subset provided moderate or high-certainty evidence of superiority to the standard of care, and no superiority to other interventions. Persistent evidence gaps for key populations, diverse settings, and long-term outcomes support the need for context-sensitive and patient-centred interventions. RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42024589177 Strengths and limitations of this study[tpltrtarr] This systematic review followed Cochrane methods and was reported in accordance with PRISMA-NMA guidelines. [tpltrtarr]The network meta-analysis integrated direct and indirect evidence to compare multiple intervention categories within a single framework. [tpltrtarr]Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using ROBUST-RCT and the GRADE approach for network meta-analysis, respectively. [tpltrtarr]Some networks were sparse, and limited representation of key populations and long-term follow-up constrained the strength and generalisability of inferences.

Regular cannabis use has been associated with alterations in reward-related neural processes, yet findings remain inconsistent and the relationship between neural activity and behavioural performance is not fully understood. The present study aimed to characterise neural and behavioural correlates of reward processing in regular cannabis users (CU) compared with matched non-users (NU) using the Monetary Incentive Delay Task (MIDT). Firstly, we assessed behavioural performance through reaction times, accuracy and monetary earnings to determine whether potential neural alterations were reflected in task performance. Secondly, focusing on reward-related brain regions, we examined group differences in BOLD functional MRI activity during anticipation and outcome phases separately for monetary win and loss conditions. Finally, we explored the association between behavioural performance and neural activation. Our findings indicate that regular cannabis use is associated with altered engagement of key nodes within the mesocorticolimbic circuit during both anticipatory and outcome phases of reward processing, accompanied by impaired behavioural performance. Particularly, compared with NU, CU showed (I) lower striatal activity during anticipation of monetary win and higher ventral striatum and frontal pole activity during anticipation of monetary loss; (II) greater VTA activation during outcome of successful monetary win and loss avoidance and lower frontal pole activity during outcome of unsuccessful loss avoidance; (III) impaired behavioural performance, reflected in lower monetary rewards and a trend towards slower reaction times and reduced accuracy; (IV) disrupted brain-behaviour coupling. Results from this study may help inform future research on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying changes in reward function and the resultant behavioural consequences of cannabis use.

Drug overdose deaths in the United States reached record levels during the fentanyl era before recently declining. A plausible hypothesis is that a sudden drop in fentanyl purity beginning in 2023 caused the downturn in overdose mortality. We evaluated this hypothesis by replicating a published analysis with regional overdose data, using models that account for time trends and autocorrelation, and negative control indicators to test for spurious correlation. When fentanyl purity was rising, the national purity series did not track overdose increases in most regions and showed only a modest association in the West. When both purity and mortality later declined, the observed associations were also seen with unrelated macroeconomic indicators that shared the same time pattern. National fentanyl purity alone does not provide a sufficient explanation for recent overdose declines.

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs), including alcohol and drug dependence, and smoking, pose a public health threat with their high prevalence and comorbidity with other diseases, and contribution to mortality. SUDs are highly correlated, and their genetic background is shared to some degree. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the genetic associations of previously reported loci for a wide range of SUDs in an unstudied Ukrainian population. Methods: We collected data from 595 individuals (339 women, 253 men), including 321 participants from two rehab centres. Based on clinical review and questionnaire data we defined drug dependence, alcohol dependence, alcohol abuse, binge drinking, smoking, opiate, amphetamine, cannabis, and hallucinogen use, along with several intermediary alcohol use and smoking variables considering the amount of use and the level of dependence. We genotyped COMT-rs4680, ADH1B-ADH1C-rs1789891, and HTR2A-rs6313, and applied logistic and ordered logistic regression assuming an additive inheritance model, controlling for the recruitment group, other substance uses, age, and sex, in the association analyses. Results: We replicate (P<0.05) the associations at COMT-rs4680 with smoking status (OR[95% CI]=1.56[1.01-2.41], P=0.047) and heaviness (1.37[1.04-1.80], P=0.026), and at ADH1B-ADH1C-rs1789891 and HTR2A-rs6313 with alcohol dependence (1.69[1.03-2.76], P=0.038 and 0.66[0.47-0.92, P=0.016], respectively). Furthermore, we provide evidence for an association at HTR2A-rs6313 with hallucinogen use (0.58[0.35-0.98], P=0.040). Conclusion: In this study on multiple SUDs we shed light on the genetic background of SUDs in Ukrainians and provide further evidence that variation at COMT is mainly associated with smoking, at ADH1B-ADH1C with alcohol-related variables, whereas HTR2A is a more general SUD-associated locus.

Background: Lung cancer screening can reduce lung cancer mortality through early detection, but uptake of the NHS Targeted Lung Health Check (TLHC) programme remains low. Behaviourally informed invitation messages have been proposed as a low-cost approach to increase attendance, but evidence of their effectiveness in lung cancer screening is mixed. Few intervention studies used evidence-based behaviour change frameworks, and rarely tailored invitation strategies to empirically identified barriers and enablers. Methods: In an online experiment, 3,274 adults aged 55-74 years and with a history of smoking were randomised to see one of four behaviourally informed invitation messages or a control message. Participants then rated their intention to attend a TLHC appointment, and selected barriers and enablers to attending from a pre-defined list, which were classified according to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Invitation messages were mapped to Behaviour Change Techniques using the Theory and Techniques Tool. Message conditions were compared on intention to attend TLHC using bootstrapped ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons. Exploratory counterfactual mediation analyses examined the role of fear in intention to attend. Results: Behaviourally informed invitation messages did not meaningfully increase intention to attend TLHC compared with the control message. While a GP-endorsed message showed a small potential benefit relative to the other conditions, this finding was not robust after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Participants most frequently reported barriers related to Emotion (particularly fear), Social Influence, and Knowledge, while Beliefs about Consequences emerged as the primary enabler of attendance. Only around half of reported barriers and enablers were addressed by the invitation messages. Exploratory analyses found that fear was associated with lower intention to attend a TLHC appointment, yet none of the behaviourally informed messages appeared to reduce fear compared to the control message. Conclusions: Improving lung cancer screening uptake will likely require invitation messages that directly address emotional concerns, particularly fear, alongside credible recommendations. These findings highlight the importance of systematically aligning invitation message content with empirically identified behavioural influences when designing scalable interventions to improve lung cancer screening uptake.

Objectives: In Latin America, up-to-date information to monitor UNAIDS 95-95-95 HIV targets in key populations, such as men who have sex with men, is limited. Elsewhere, structural homophobia restricts access to ART. Conceptual frameworks suggest that intersecting forms of violence and discrimination may negatively influence HIV care outcomes through psychosocial and structural pathways, although empirical evidence remains limited. The study aimed to assess whether sexual orientation outness and recent homophobic violence are associated with not being on ART among Latin American MSM living with HIV. Methods: This cross-sectional study is a secondary analysis of data from LAMIS-2018, including 7,609 MSM aged 18+ with an HIV diagnosis [&ge;]1 year prior from 18 Latin American countries. Participants self-reported ART status, sociodemographic characteristics, homophobic violence, and sexual orientation outness. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions identified those factors associated with not being on ART. Results: Nine percent of MSM with HIV were not on ART, 18% reported low sexual orientation outness, and 27% experienced homophobic violence, especially in Andean and Central American countries. Not being on ART was associated with recent homophobic violence (aPR=1.25), low outness (aPR=1.22), unemployment (aPR=1.27), and residence in the Andean subregion (aPR=1.87), Mexico (aPR=1.28), or the Southern Cone (aPR=1.45) versus Brazil. Protective factors included being older (25-39: aPR=0.72; >39: aPR=0.49), living in large cities (aPR=0.72), having a stable partner (aPR=0.78), and university education (aPR=0.74). Conclusions: Recent homophobic violence and low sexual orientation outness were associated with not being on ART among MSM in Latin America. While access varies across countries, structural factors such as stigma and violence may limit engagement in care. Addressing these barriers alongside strengthening health systems may be key to improving ART uptake and advancing progress toward the 95-95-95 targets.

IntroductionAcross Europe, many people with HIV are diagnosed late despite repeated contact with hospital services for HIV indicator conditions. These conditions flag a possible underlying HIV infection for which HIV testing is recommended. They provide an opportunity to identify people with HIV, yet implementation of indicator condition based testing remains insufficient in hospital practice. The #aware.hiv Europe study was developed to address this gap by embedding HIV teams into routine care to normalise HIV testing. Methods and analysis#aware.hiv Europe is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial in 30 hospitals across ten European countries. Five clusters of 6 hospitals each will sequentially transition from control to implementation periods when local HIV teams led by an infectious diseases specialist will be installed. Intervention activities include hospital-wide peer audit and feedback on missed testing opportunities, targeted education, stigma reduction activities, and strengthening of linkage to HIV prevention and care. Patients with predefined HIV indicator conditions are identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes, confirmed through manual review. The primary outcome is the change in HIV testing rate among patients with confirmed HIV indicator conditions. Secondary outcomes include HIV case detection, cascades of diagnosis, care and prevention, variation in testing practices, healthcare professional knowledge and stigma, and implementation outcomes. Analyses will use mixed effects regression models accounting for clustering and time within the stepped-wedge design. Ethics and disseminationThe study has ethical approval in all hospitals to use routinely collected clinical data under exemption from informed consent for patient level data. Results will be disseminated through peer reviewed publications, conferences, and collaboration with clinical and community partners with the goal to inform HIV testing policies. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06900829. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06900829 Strengths and limitations of this study+ Large, multinational, real-world, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial design. + Primary outcome derived from routinely collected clinical data, using a GDPR- and GCP-compliant approach with exemption from informed consent. + Hospital-wide intervention targeting care professionals, delivered through proactive expert HIV teams across departments powered to conclude on hard HIV care cascade clinical endpoints and stigma reducing interventions. + Implementation science design informed by established frameworks (CFIR and RE-AIM) to strengthen cross-continental generalisability. - Variation in healthcare systems and baseline testing practices across countries may contribute to heterogeneity in implementation and outcomes. - Despite standardised SOPs, local clinical judgement influences the assessment of HIV indicator conditions.

Introduction Understanding provider preferences for the design of HIV treatment packages could enhance the implementation of programs to support the adoption of long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI ART) by people living with HIV who are interested in initiating this treatment modality. Methods We recruited providers from New York City (NYC), Rockland, Putman, and Westchester County Ryan White Part A Medical Case Management (MCM) programs to complete a discrete choice experiment (DCE) containing twelve tasks with two alternatives and an opt-out option, with additional survey questions about implementation readiness and choice motivations. The alternatives included four attributes--Type of ART Medication (monthly or bimonthly LAI ART), Service Location and Mode, Support for Clients, and Rewards for Clients--with 2-4 levels each. We ran latent class multinomial logit analyses (LCA) with 1-5 classes to estimate preferences and explore hypothesis-free preference heterogeneity. We estimated attribute influence using relative importances and preferences using zero-centered part-worth utilities for each level. Results One hundred seventy-seven providers completed the survey (July 2022-January 2023). About half (52%) were 40-59 years old, 72% identified as women, and the plurality (41%) identified as Latino/a. We chose the two-group LCA solution. Bimonthly LAI ART was preferred over monthly LAI ART overall and in both groups. Group 1 (n=45) preferred more traditional adherence supports (e.g., injections at the clinic by appointment, injection appointment reminders) whereas Group 2 (n=132) preferred more client-centered supports (e.g., injections at home by appointment, free transportation to injection appointments if at a clinic). Both groups preferred higher monetary value gift cards for clients for every on-time injection. The top-ranking motivations indicated that participants prioritized patient convenience over job satisfaction and administrative or financial feasibility for the agency. The scores for all implementation measures indicate readiness to implement LAI ART in both groups. Conclusions Our implementation science-focused study suggests that providers of MCM services in NYC and surrounding counties are motivated to offer services to support clients' access and adherence to LAI ART. More work is needed to understand how programs have, in fact, integrated supports for LAI ART into their services.

Abstract Importance Stigma and discrimination against transgender and gender-diverse people are prevalent across many settings and may contribute to substantial health disparities. Objective To synthesize global evidence on the prevalence of stigma, discrimination, and resilience among transgender (trans) and gender-diverse adults. Data Sources A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, LILACS, and PsycInfo for articles published between January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2023. This database search was supplemented by grey literature and secondary reference searches. Article Selection Studies were eligible if they presented primary quantitative data on prevalence of stigma, discrimination, and/or resilience among trans and gender-diverse adults (aged 18 and over), with no restrictions on study design, language, or geographic region. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted data using standardized forms, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Prevalence Articles was used to assess risk of bias. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted for dichotomous prevalence measures using inverse variance weighting and logit transformation; non-dichotomous prevalence data were summarized descriptively. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes included prevalence estimates for various forms of stigma (anticipated, perceived, internalized, and experienced), discrimination in legal/institutional settings (housing, healthcare, employment, police/prison), and resilience. Results A total of 97 articles, with data from 72,158 unique trans and gender-diverse participants across 26 countries, met inclusion criteria. Studies showed moderate levels of anticipated stigma, perceived stigma, and internalized stigma. Meta-analyses of 36 studies provided pooled estimates of discrimination prevalence across multiple domains: 21.4% in housing (e.g., eviction, rental denial), 24.6% in healthcare (e.g., denial of care, mistreatment), 32.8% in employment (e.g., hiring bias, workplace harassment), and 39.1% in police/prison settings (e.g., profiling, mistreatment). High heterogeneity was observed across studies, reflecting regional and methodological differences. Resilience scores ranged from moderate to high, indicating variation within trans and gender-diverse communities. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and meta-analysis found that stigma and discrimination against trans and gender-diverse adults are pervasive globally. Variation in stigma and discrimination across settings and regions underscores the need for targeted interventions and policy reforms. Funding World Health Organization through a grant from the Elton John AIDS Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Introduction: Smoking cessation after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a Class I recommendation, yet prescription pharmacotherapy use remains low and its real-world cardiovascular effectiveness when added to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is poorly characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (67 healthcare organizations). Adults hospitalized with ACS who received NRT within one month, serving as a proxy for active smoking status, were identified. Two co-primary propensity-matched (1:1, 50 covariates, caliper 0.10 SD) comparisons evaluated bupropion + NRT and varenicline + NRT individually versus NRT alone; a supportive analysis evaluated combined pharmacotherapy versus NRT alone. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included MACE, heart failure exacerbations, major bleeding, TIA/stroke, emergency rehospitalizations, and cardiac rehabilitation utilization, assessed at 6 months and 1 year via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) greater than 1.0 indicate higher hazard in the NRT-only group. Results: After matching, the combined analysis comprised 8,574 pairs, the bupropion analysis 4,654 pairs, and the varenicline analysis 2,126 pairs. At 1 year, the combined pharmacotherapy group had significantly lower all-cause mortality (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.16-1.37), MACE (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.12-1.21), heart failure exacerbations (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.25), major bleeding (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.28), and greater cardiac rehabilitation utilization (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.92; all p < 0.001). TIA/stroke did not differ significantly. Six-month results were consistent. Both varenicline and bupropion individually showed lower mortality and MACE. A urinary tract infection falsification endpoint showed no between-group differences, supporting matching validity. The pharmacotherapy group had higher rates of new-onset depression, driven predominantly by bupropion recipients. Conclusions: In this propensity-matched real-world analysis, adding prescription smoking cessation pharmacotherapy to NRT after ACS was associated with lower mortality and fewer adverse cardiovascular events, supporting broader integration into post-ACS care pathways.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the return on investment (ROI) of a community based Diabetes Self Management Program (DSMP) enhanced with health related social needs (HRSN) screening and referrals, implemented by the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene with three community based organizations in highly impacted, under resourced neighborhoods. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cost benefit analysis from a public sector payer perspective was conducted among 171 adults with type 2 diabetes who completed a six week, peer led DSMP delivered by community health workers (CHWs) in English, Spanish, and Korean during 2018 2019. A time driven, activity based costing model captured direct implementation costs, CHW workforce turnover, and administrative overhead. Monetized benefits included avoided diabetes related complications, reductions in self reported emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations, and quality adjusted life year (QALY) gains from improved medication adherence. Univariate sensitivity analyses tested robustness under conservative assumptions. RESULTS: Total program costs were $179,224; monetized benefits totaled $1,824,213, yielding a net benefit of $1,644,989 and an ROI of 918%, approximately $10 returned per $1 invested. Excluding QALY gains, ROI remained 551%. Self reported ED visits declined from 149 to 82 and hospitalizations from 93 to 24 in the six months following intervention. Over 80% of participants reported housing instability; 72% were Medicaid covered and 16% uninsured. Sensitivity analyses confirmed a positive ROI under all conservative scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: A CHW led, community based DSMP integrated with HRSN screening and referrals delivered substantial economic and public health value among adults facing housing instability and structural barriers to care. Findings support inclusion of DSMP as a covered benefit in Medicaid managed care, value based payment arrangements, and housing access initiatives to advance equitable diabetes outcomes.

IntroductionOn January 20, 2025, the U.S. government froze foreign assistance including for PEPFAR, though a limited waiver for "life-saving" interventions was subsequently granted. PEPFARs 2025 monitoring results, released April 17, 2026, covered only quarter 4 while an earlier inadvertent release included all four quarters. Combining both data sets, we systematically assess facility-level programmatic performance and reporting trends to quantify service disruptions accounting for reporting discrepancies. MethodsWe categorized facilities by reporting continuity across Q1 2024 and Q4 2025 (e.g. continuous, intermittent, dropped, or new) and assessed changes in service delivery by the category of health facility for key HIV treatment, testing, PMTCT, and prevention programming. We additionally analyze changes in employed human resources for health (HRH) reported by PEPFAR. ResultsPEPFAR data included 31,746 facilities and community service sites. 71.3% were classified as continuous reporters, 16.9% intermittent reporters, 2.5% community services, 3.9% dropped in 2025, and 3.1% new in 2025. Total number of people accessing HIV treatment declined modestly by -0.3%, but differed by facility category. Continuous facilities saw a 0.5% increase in people on treatment, while intermittent facilities saw a -1.7% decrease. HIV testing declined -17%. HIV diagnoses declined -13% in continuous facilities, -35% in community services, and -29% in intermittent facilities. PMTCT infant testing and diagnoses declined by -6% and -12% in continuous facilities, respectively, and -60% and -31% in intermittent facilities, respectively. PrEP initiations declined -33%. Total direct service delivery HCWs reduced -62,541 (-24%) ConclusionThese findings reveal substantial disruptions across PEPFAR service areas, with the steepest declines among intermittent and community-based delivery sites, alongside a 24% reduction in direct service delivery healthcare workers. As potentially the final data set PEPFAR will ever release, these findings represent a troubling inflection point. The dismantling of public data systems and accountability structures undermine progress and enable programmatic gaps to develop and go unnoticed that risk allowing HIV resurgence to occur over the coming years.

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of delivering an adapted problem-solving skills (PSS) intervention by quantifying the recruitment, follow-up and completion rates using a brief problem-solving intervention for people with a mental health diagnosis in two Polish prisons. Design: IAPPS is an open, multi-centred, parallel group feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT). Setting: Two prisons in Poland. Participants: Men in custody aged 18 years and older, having a mental illness and living within the prison therapeutic unit. Interventions: The intervention consisted of an adapted PSS skills intervention plus care as usual (CAU) or care as usual only. Delivered in groups of up to five people in 1.5-hour sessions over the course of two weeks. Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes - rate of recruitment, follow-up, and feasibility to deliver the intervention. Secondary outcomes included measures of depression, general mental health, and coping strategies. Results: 129 male prisoners were screened, 64 were randomly allocated, with a mean age of 53.5 years (SD 14, range 23-84). 59 (95%) prisoners were of Polish origin. Our recruitment rate was 48%. There was differential follow up with those in the intervention group less likely to complete the post-test battery versus those who received care as usual. Outcome measures were successfully collected at both time points. Conclusions We were able to recruit, retain and deliver the intervention within the prison setting; some logistical challenges limited our assessment of intervention engagement. Our data helps to demonstrate how use of the RCT study design can be implemented and delivered within the complex prison environment. Trial registration number ISRCTN 70138247, protocol registration date May 2021

IntroductionOver one billion people worldwide have hypertension. In Zimbabwe, prevalence is an estimated 38%, surpassing the global average of 34%, and >50% of hypertensives are undiagnosed. The Community BP groups (Com-BP) study examined whether community groups of people living with hypertension, provided with BP machines and led by trained Facilitators could improve awareness, screening and support for those diagnosed with hypertension, to help blood pressure (BP) control. We present findings from the quantitative evaluation of the Com-BP pilot intervention. MethodsThe acceptability of the Com-BP intervention, its potential effectiveness in improving knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) and in reducing BP among hypertensive adults in Zimbabwe, was evaluated. Cross-sectional surveys using standardised questionnaires, and BP and Body Mass Index (BMI) assessments, were done at the start and end of the pilot intervention. Statistical evidence of difference between baseline and follow-up was examined using Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous data and McNemars test for categorical data. ResultsFourteen groups (seven urban and seven rural) were formed and 151 participants joined over a median of 5months. Retention in the groups was 97.9% (137/140 recruited at baseline), with approximately equal numbers from the urban and rural sites. Median age at baseline was 54 years (IQR 45-66y; min-max 30-92y) and the majority (79%, n=108) were female. Most participants (82.5%, n=113) rated their experience of the group sessions as excellent. The proportions of participants with changes in KAP from baseline to endline were as follows: 45.3% (n=62) to 81.0% (n=111) (p=0.004) able to identify at least two pre-disposing factors for hypertension; 65.0% (n=89) to 77.4% (n=106) (p=0.02) reporting [&ge;]1day of vigorous physical activity/week; 28.5% (n=39) to 13.9% (n=19) (p=0.001) reporting salt added to meals at the table. There was no statistical evidence of any difference in medication adherence, p=0.06. The proportion of participants with uncontrolled hypertension was 58.1% (n=79) at baseline and reduced to 31.8% (n=43) at follow-up (p<0.001). DiscussionCommunity groups for improving awareness, detection and support are acceptable and led to improvements in self-reported KAP and prevalence of uncontrolled BP. Further research on the sustainability and impact of the intervention is required.

This updated systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of obesity management medications (OMMs) in terms of reducing body weight and obesity related complications. Medline and Embase were searched up to 21 November 2025 for randomized controlled trials comparing OMMs versus placebo or active comparators in adults. The primary endpoint was percentage total body weight loss (TBWL%) at the end of the study. Secondary endpoints were TBWL% at 1, 2 and 3 years, anthropometric, metabolic, mental health and quality of life outcomes, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, remission of obesity related complications, serious adverse events and all cause mortality. Sixty six RCTs (66 comparisons) were identified: orlistat (22), semaglutide (18), liraglutide (11), tirzepatide (8), naltrexone/bupropion (5) and phentermine/topiramate (2), enrolling 63,909 patients (34,861 and 29,048 with active compound and placebo, respectively). All OMMs showed significantly greater TBWL% versus placebo; tirzepatide and semaglutide exceeded 10% TBWL and showed the most favourable glycaemic effects. Semaglutide reduced major adverse cardiovascular events and all cause mortality. In dedicated complication specific trials, semaglutide and tirzepatide showed benefit on heart failure related outcomes; tirzepatide was associated with improved obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and semaglutide with knee osteoarthritis pain remission. Tirzepatide and semaglutide were associated with improvements in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis remission, and semaglutide with improvement in liver fibrosis. No OMMs were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events. These updated results reinforce the need to individualize OMMs selection according to weight loss efficacy, complication profile and safety.

Sweetened alcoholic beverages are thought to contribute to developing Alcohol Use Disorder by increasing palatability. One monosaccharide, glucose, readily enters the brain more than fructose and directly impacts the activity of central neurons. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of glucose versus fructose on alcohol drinking patterns in female and male rats. Rats drank alcohol cocktails (1.25%-10%) containing either glucose or fructose (10%) in 4-hour sessions. We sought to parse orosensory effects from post-ingestive central effects by analyzing drinking microstructure. We compared measures of palatability and post-ingestive feedback between early and later in the session when brain levels of alcohol and glucose are different. We found that rats of both sexes drank more low alcohol glucose cocktails than cocktails containing fructose by volume and by overall calories. When considering the dose of alcohol, glucose potentiated alcohol intake by shifting the dose-response curve leftward compared to similar fructose cocktails. We found that drinking patterns associated with palatability remained stable for both types of cocktails over the entire drinking session. In contrast, post-ingestive behavior related to brain mediated satiety or positive feedback showed a greater influence of the session time, as well as a greater interaction with sex. Overall, our results suggest that glucose and alcohol interact to impact central regulation of cocktail drinking. This highlights that the type of sugar within cocktails interacts and ultimately have different effects on brain regulated alcohol drinking.

BackgroundChlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis are curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) associated with adverse birth outcomes. Most infections are asymptomatic. Whether antenatal STI screening improves birth outcomes remains uncertain. MethodsIn a randomized three-group trial in South Africa, pregnant women aged 18 years or older were assigned before 27 weeks gestation to: (1) screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis at enrollment, with tests-of-cure (One-Time Screening); (2) screening and treatment at enrollment, repeated at 30 to 34 weeks (Two-Time Screening); or (3) Standard-of-Care (Syndromic management). The primary outcome was a composite of preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation) or low birthweight (<2500 g), analyzed in the modified intention-to-treat population of participants with live births. Components of the composite outcome were evaluated individually as the main secondary outcomes. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04446611. FindingsOf 2247 enrolled participants, 1910 had live births. The composite outcome occurred in 22{middle dot}9% of the One-Time Screening group (risk ratio [RR] 0{middle dot}99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0{middle dot}81-1{middle dot}21), 20{middle dot}6% of the Two-Time Screening group (RR 0{middle dot}89; 95% CI 0{middle dot}72-1{middle dot}09), compared with 23{middle dot}2% of the Standard-of-Care group. Preterm birth occurred in 18{middle dot}9% of the One-Time Screening group (RR 1{middle dot}00; 95% CI 0{middle dot}80-1{middle dot}26), 14{middle dot}5% of the Two-Time Screening group (RR 0{middle dot}77; 95% CI 0{middle dot}60-0{middle dot}99), and 18{middle dot}8% of the Standard-of-Care group. Low birthweight occurred in 14{middle dot}1% of the One-Time Screening group (RR 1{middle dot}10; 95% CI 0{middle dot}83-1{middle dot}46), 12{middle dot}9% of the Two-Time Screening group (RR 1{middle dot}01; 95% CI 0{middle dot}76-1{middle dot}35), and 12{middle dot}8% of the Standard-of-Care group. InterpretationNeither screening strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis reduced the primary composite outcome of preterm birth or low birthweight, or low birthweight alone. The Two-Time antenatal STI screening strategy, however, reduced preterm birth by 23%.