Back

Indirect Genetic Effects on Alcohol Use Disorder and Nicotine Dependence

Luo, M.; Trindade Pons, V.; Zakharin, M.; Pingault, J.-B.; Gillespie, N. A.; van Loo, H. M.

2026-04-19 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.04.17.26351089 medRxiv
Show abstract

Substance use disorders run in families, yet the mechanisms underlying intergenerational transmission remain unclear. We investigated indirect genetic effects, pathways through which parental genotypes influence offspring phenotypes via the family environment, for alcohol use disorder (AUD), nicotine dependence (ND), and related quantitative outcomes, and aimed to identify family environmental factors through which such effects may operate. Using transmitted and non-transmitted polygenic scores (PGS) constructed for problematic alcohol use, tobacco use disorder, and general addiction liability, we analyzed 5972 European-ancestry adult offspring with at least one genotyped parent from the population-based Lifelines cohort (Netherlands). Offspring outcomes included lifetime DSM-5 AUD diagnosis, AUD symptom count, maximum drinks in 24 hours, Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence score, and cigarettes per day. AUD findings were meta-analyzed with data from the Brisbane Longitudinal Twin Study (N = 1368; Australia). We also examined parent-of-origin effects and mediation by parental substance use and socioeconomic status using structural equation modeling. Transmitted PGS robustly predicted all AUD and ND outcomes ({beta} = 0.07-0.16; OR = 1.20 for AUD diagnosis). Non-transmitted PGS, indexing indirect genetic effects, were negligible for all clinical syndrome outcomes. The only significant indirect genetic effect was on cigarettes per day ({beta} = 0.03, p = 0.01), mediated by parental smoking behavior but not socioeconomic status. These findings indicate that intergenerational transmission of risk for AUD and ND is driven primarily by direct genetic effects, with modest indirect genetic effects on smoking quantity. Larger samples and cross-trait analyses are needed to further elucidate these mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
4
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.1%
5
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
6
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
8
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
10
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
11
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
18
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
20
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%