Back

The Acceptability and Impact of the Community-Based Blood Pressure Group pilot intervention in Zimbabwe.

Mhino, F. M.; Ndanga, A.; Chivandire, T.; Sekanevana, C.; Mpandaguta, C. E.; Mwanza, T.; Mutengerere, A.; Scott, S.; Chimberengwa, P.; Dixon, J.; Ndhlovu, C. E.; Seeley, J.; Chingono, R. M. S.; Sabapathy, K.

2026-04-22 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.20.26351307 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionOver one billion people worldwide have hypertension. In Zimbabwe, prevalence is an estimated 38%, surpassing the global average of 34%, and >50% of hypertensives are undiagnosed. The Community BP groups (Com-BP) study examined whether community groups of people living with hypertension, provided with BP machines and led by trained Facilitators could improve awareness, screening and support for those diagnosed with hypertension, to help blood pressure (BP) control. We present findings from the quantitative evaluation of the Com-BP pilot intervention. MethodsThe acceptability of the Com-BP intervention, its potential effectiveness in improving knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) and in reducing BP among hypertensive adults in Zimbabwe, was evaluated. Cross-sectional surveys using standardised questionnaires, and BP and Body Mass Index (BMI) assessments, were done at the start and end of the pilot intervention. Statistical evidence of difference between baseline and follow-up was examined using Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous data and McNemars test for categorical data. ResultsFourteen groups (seven urban and seven rural) were formed and 151 participants joined over a median of 5months. Retention in the groups was 97.9% (137/140 recruited at baseline), with approximately equal numbers from the urban and rural sites. Median age at baseline was 54 years (IQR 45-66y; min-max 30-92y) and the majority (79%, n=108) were female. Most participants (82.5%, n=113) rated their experience of the group sessions as excellent. The proportions of participants with changes in KAP from baseline to endline were as follows: 45.3% (n=62) to 81.0% (n=111) (p=0.004) able to identify at least two pre-disposing factors for hypertension; 65.0% (n=89) to 77.4% (n=106) (p=0.02) reporting [&ge;]1day of vigorous physical activity/week; 28.5% (n=39) to 13.9% (n=19) (p=0.001) reporting salt added to meals at the table. There was no statistical evidence of any difference in medication adherence, p=0.06. The proportion of participants with uncontrolled hypertension was 58.1% (n=79) at baseline and reduced to 31.8% (n=43) at follow-up (p<0.001). DiscussionCommunity groups for improving awareness, detection and support are acceptable and led to improvements in self-reported KAP and prevalence of uncontrolled BP. Further research on the sustainability and impact of the intervention is required.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.9%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
12
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%