Aspirin and healthy longevity within racial and ethnic minoritized older adults in the United States
Tzimas, G.; Vanghelof, J. C.; Mohammed, A.; Raicu, D. S.; Du, L.; Ernst, M. E.; Warner, E. T.; Chan, A. T.; Ryan, J. C.; Espinoza, S. E.; Murray, A.; Sheets, K.; Tchoua, R. B.; Shah, R. C.
Show abstract
Importance: The ASPREE randomized trial found no overall benefit of low-dose aspirin for disability-free survival among older adults. However, individual estimates in pre-specified subgroups indicated potential benefit among racial and ethnic minoritized participants in the United States (US). Objective: To evaluate whether the effect of low-dose aspirin vs placebo on disability-free survival differed across US Black and Hispanic ASPREE participants using individualized treatment-effect estimation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Post hoc clinical trial analysis of ASPREE, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of daily low-dose aspirin vs placebo. This analysis included US ASPREE participants who self-identified as non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic, were aged 65 years or older, and had complete baseline predictor and outcome data. Interventions: Randomization to daily 100-mg aspirin or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was loss of disability-free survival, defined as death, persistent physical disability, or dementia. Individualized treatment effects were estimated post hoc using a Random Survival Forest X-learner. Heterogeneity was evaluated on the relative scale with Cox proportional hazards models and on the absolute scale with 5-year risk differences. Results: Among 2411 US ASPREE participants, 1270 were included in the Black and Hispanic analytic cohort (897 non-Hispanic Black and 373 Hispanic participants; mean age, 71.8 years). Aspirin was associated with lower risk of disability-free survival loss compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.93). In model-derived tertiles, aspirin was associated with lower risk in the greatest predicted-benefit group (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71; 5-year absolute risk difference [ARD], -11.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -22.0 to -0.1) but not in the lowest predicted-benefit group (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.70-2.27; ARD, +3.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.9 to 13.6). Conclusions and Relevance: In these analyses of US Black and Hispanic ASPREE participants, aspirin effects on disability-free survival appear to be heterogeneous, with benefit concentrated in a subset of participants. Because these findings are from post-hoc models, they should be externally validated before being incorporated into clinical decision-making. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01038583; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01038583
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Loneliness and Cognitive Decline Among U.S. Adults: A Stratified Analysis of the BRFSS 93%
- Incidence and risk factors for post-stroke delirium in the elderly: a national inpatient sample (NIS) analysis 93%
- Effect of common maintenance drugs on the risk and severity of COVID-19 in elderly patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological frailty in older adults: a systematic scoping review 90%
- Analyses of academician cohorts generate biased pandemic excess death estimates 90%
- Large-scale validation of the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) using a short form: high risk of bias models show poorer discrimination 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Plasma Level of ATPase Inhibitory Factor 1 (IF1) and intrinsic capacity in community-dwelling older adults: Prospective data from the MAPT Study 93%
- Genetically Increased Telomere Length and Aging-related Physical and Cognitive Traits in the UK Biobank 92%
- Antecedent Metabolic Health and Metformin (ANTHEM) Aging study: Rationale and study design for a randomized controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 94%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 94%
- The IGNITE Trial: Participant Recruitment Lessons Prior to SARS-CoV-2 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.