Nanopore sequencing to measure chromosome end-specific telomere lengths in human cells
Groot, A.; Karimian, K.; Rechsteiner, A.; Greider, C. W.
Show abstract
Summary/AbstractTelomere length has a significant impact on human health. Short telomeres cause age-related diseases, including pulmonary fibrosis, immunodeficiency, and bone marrow failure, while long telomeres predispose to cancer. Given the impact on human health, accurately measuring telomere length is important. A variety of methods have been developed over the past 40 years to measure telomere length. Many of these methods report only on the mean length of all of the telomere in the cell. Here, we describe the Telomere Profiling protocol using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) based on long read sequencing that can accurately measure chromosome specific telomere length.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Penguin: A Tool for Predicting Pseudouridine Sites in Direct RNA Nanopore Sequencing Data 90%
- Optical Pooled Screening for the Discovery of Regulators of the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres Pathway 90%
- Sci-Hi-C: a single-cell Hi-C method for mapping 3D genome organization in large number of single cells 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic dissection of biases in whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing reveals major determinants of coding sequence coverage 91%
- An integrated Asian human SNV and indel benchmark combining multiple sequencing methods 90%
- Scaling Logical Density of DNA storage with Enzymatically-Ligated Composite Motifs 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-Cell Virtual Cytometer allows user-friendly and versatile analysis and visualization of multimodal single cell RNAseq datasets 90%
- FLYNC: A Machine Learning-Driven Framework for Discovering Long Non-Coding RNAs in Drosophila melanogaster 90%
- Whole genome sequencing with AVITI and NovaSeq X Plus reveals comparable performance with contextual biases 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.