Back

Time-restricted eating promotes sustained fat loss in Drosophila

Gatto, J. A.; Chang, T. Y.; Kanmogne, W. C.; Pen, S.; Bortey, L. R.; Kwon, J. N.; Mahal, L.; Kim, H. S.; Berhanu, L.; Oduk, F.; Rabon, M. R.; Park, S. J.; Barnhart, E. L.; Ja, W. W.; Stavropoulos, N.; Canman, J. C.; Shirasu-Hiza, M.

2026-08-10 physiology
10.64898/2026.08.05.742897 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While current therapeutics restricting calorie intake, such as GLP-1 agonists, induce fat loss for many people, they are ineffective for others and concerns remain about their long-term effects on health, particularly loss of lean muscle mass. Moreover, many quickly regain fat if they stop treatment. In contrast, time-restricted eating does not restrict calorie intake but instead restricts the time window for eating and prevents obesity in mice and humans. Here we investigated the effects of intermittent Time-Restricted Feeding (iTRF), which extends lifespan and delays markers of aging, on stored fat in Drosophila. Ten days of iTRF caused significant fat loss relative to ad lib diet, an effect that persisted even after return to ad lib diet. Unlike iTRF-induced lifespan extension, iTRF-induced fat loss did not depend on circadian-regulated autophagy. iTRF treated both diet-induced and genetically induced obesity and significantly reduced lipid droplet size in the fat body (adipose tissue). Instead of causing muscle loss, iTRF increased total and muscle-specific protein levels and enhanced flight performance, suggesting a shift in body composition. We found that iTRF evoked fasting-induced hyperactivity, partially mediated by octopamine, the fly ortholog of the human stress hormone norepinephrine. Ablation of octopaminergic neurons (OANs) prevented iTRF-mediated effects: fat loss, increased protein, and enhanced flight performance. Our results suggest that Drosophila iTRF causes rapid, permanent fat loss and increased muscle function through a "fight or flight" response. Understanding the mechanisms driving differences between Drosophila and human responses to TRE could be critical for identifying effective therapeutic targets for obesity.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.