Back

Plasma Taurine Relative Abundance, Not Dietary Intake or Genetic Predisposition, Predicts All-Cause Mortality and Unhealthy Ageing: A Prospective Cohort Study

Lyu, J.; Lee, S.-J.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Lim, J.-Y.; Park, Y. J.

2026-07-13 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357704 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background: The influence of taurine on biological ageing remains unclear, particularly whether it acts as a causal driver or a functional biomarker. We aimed to disentangle the distinct roles of plasma taurine relative abundance, dietary taurine supply, and genetic metabolic capacity on all-cause mortality and unhealthy ageing. Methods: This prospective study used data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (2001~2022). A subcohort of 2,321 participants (mean age 56.5 years; 51.4% female) with complete metabolomic, dietary, and genomic data was analyzed. Three independent pathways were evaluated: (1) plasma taurine/total amino acid (AA) ratio, (2) dietary taurine to protein ratio, and (3) a weighted genetic risk score (GRS) from 21 SNPs in taurine biosynthesis and transport genes. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and unhealthy ageing (Physiological Healthy Ageing Index [PHAI] score [≤] 25th percentile). Results: A higher plasma taurine/total AA ratio was consistently associated with improved ageing outcomes. Participants in the highest quartile showed 29% lower all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.52-0.98; P for trend = .04) and lower risk of PHAI-based unhealthy ageing (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00; P for trend = .04) versus the lowest quartile. Dietary taurine-to-protein ratio was not associated with mortality (P for trend = .70), nor was the GRS (P for trend = .74). Conclusions: The protective association of taurine was linked to its relative abundance within the systemic amino acid pool, rather than dietary intake or genetic predisposition, supporting taurine as a functional biomarker of metabolic efficiency rather than a deterministic causal driver of ageing.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.6%
2
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.3%
3
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.7%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
5
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
6
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
10
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.2%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.7%
13
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Clinical Epigenetics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Biogerontology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
21
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Twin Research and Human Genetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
23
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
25
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%