Back

Plasma Taurine Relative Abundance, Not Dietary Intake or Genetic Predisposition, Predicts All-Cause Mortality and Unhealthy Ageing: A Prospective Cohort Study

Lyu, J.; Lee, S.-J.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Lim, J.-Y.; Park, Y. J.

2026-07-13 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.07.09.26357704 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background: The influence of taurine on biological ageing remains unclear, particularly whether it acts as a causal driver or a functional biomarker. We aimed to disentangle the distinct roles of plasma taurine relative abundance, dietary taurine supply, and genetic metabolic capacity on all-cause mortality and unhealthy ageing. Methods: This prospective study used data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (2001~2022). A subcohort of 2,321 participants (mean age 56.5 years; 51.4% female) with complete metabolomic, dietary, and genomic data was analyzed. Three independent pathways were evaluated: (1) plasma taurine/total amino acid (AA) ratio, (2) dietary taurine to protein ratio, and (3) a weighted genetic risk score (GRS) from 21 SNPs in taurine biosynthesis and transport genes. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and unhealthy ageing (Physiological Healthy Ageing Index [PHAI] score [≤] 25th percentile). Results: A higher plasma taurine/total AA ratio was consistently associated with improved ageing outcomes. Participants in the highest quartile showed 29% lower all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.52-0.98; P for trend = .04) and lower risk of PHAI-based unhealthy ageing (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00; P for trend = .04) versus the lowest quartile. Dietary taurine-to-protein ratio was not associated with mortality (P for trend = .70), nor was the GRS (P for trend = .74). Conclusions: The protective association of taurine was linked to its relative abundance within the systemic amino acid pool, rather than dietary intake or genetic predisposition, supporting taurine as a functional biomarker of metabolic efficiency rather than a deterministic causal driver of ageing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.