Back

Developing Provider-Co-Created Prototypes Addressing Equity-Related Barriers in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma"

Nephew, L.; Moore, C.; Garcia, N.; Parks, L.; McKay, A.; Abad, S.; Rawl, S.

2026-05-21 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.05.15.26353301 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Black patients and individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) face significant disparities in accessing curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including liver transplantation. This study aimed to develop provider-co-created intervention prototypes in response to patient-identified barriers and recommendations. Methods: A human-centered design session with hepatology and transplant providers at a large academic medical center was conducted. Prior to the session, participants were presented with barriers and preliminary solutions identified through an earlier human-centered design session with Black and low-SES patients. Using structured ideation methods, including brainwriting, challenge mapping, and concept voting, providers co-created intervention prototypes. Final concepts were synthesized from patient insights, provider input, and design methods using affinity diagramming and concept modeling. Results: Nine providers participated in the session. They focused on three key areas for intervention: inefficiencies in transplant pre-evaluation, inadequate social support, and information overload. Solutions included: (1) a structured triage pathway to standardize referrals and reduce delays; (2) a peer navigator model to guide patients through the transplant process; and (3) a multimodal transplant education roadmap to improve comprehension and engagement. These prototypes addressed both patient- and system-level barriers. Conclusions: Protypes developed through provider-led design, grounded in patient-identified barriers and co-created ideas, can yield actionable, scalable strategies to advance equity in HCC care. Future work will refine these prototypes through patient feedback and pilot them in clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.3%
3
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
4
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
5
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
21
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
30
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%