Epigenetic Aging Clocks Associate with Cognitive Status but Not Cognitive Decline: Evidence from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative
Feng, B.; Gao, A.; Yang, J.
Show abstract
Cognitive impairment is a major source of disability in Parkinsonian disorders, yet biomarkers that distinguish cognitive status from cognitive decline remain limited. DNA methylation-based epigenetic aging measures capture complementary dimensions of biological aging, but it remains unclear whether they primarily reflect stable differences in cognitive vulnerability or longitudinal cognitive change. We examined associations between epigenetic aging measures and global cognition in the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort. Seven epigenetic aging measures were derived from peripheral blood DNA methylation data, and cognition was assessed longitudinally using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Linear mixed-effects models were applied in complementary frameworks, including baseline-plus-change-from-baseline models and within-person versus between-person decomposition models. Secondary analyses included baseline clock-by-time interaction models and a decline-focused sensitivity analysis. Across analyses, higher epigenetic aging was consistently associated with lower overall MoCA scores. In the baseline-plus-change-from-baseline models, the analytic baseline component showed the dominant signal, whereas the change-from-baseline terms were not significant after false discovery rate correction. In the within-person versus between-person decomposition models, associations were concentrated in the between-person component, while within-person deviation terms were not significant. Secondary analyses were consistent with this pattern. Together, these findings suggest that blood-based epigenetic aging measures may be more informative as biomarkers of cognitive status or vulnerability than as markers of short-term cognitive progression. Larger studies with longer follow-up and more detailed cognitive phenotyping are needed to clarify their longitudinal relevance.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Complementary value of molecular, phenotypic and functional aging biomarkers in dementia prediction 98%
- Your Brain Doesn't Look a Day Past 70! Cross-Sectional Associations with Brain-Predicted Age in the Cognitively-Intact Oldest-Old 96%
- Human Brain Aging is Associated with Dysregulation of Cell-Type Epigenetic Identity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between telomere length and cognitive function among cognitively unimpaired individuals at risk of Alzheimer’s disease 95%
- Improving brain age estimates with deep learning leads to identification of novel genetic factors associated with brain aging 94%
- Identification of Circular RNAs associated with Ageing of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex across the Adult Lifespan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of epigenetic and metabolomic biomarkers indicating biological age 97%
- Relationship between five Epigenetic Clocks, Telomere Length and Functional Capacity assessed in Older Adults: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Analyses 96%
- Associations of Loneliness and Social Isolation with Healthspan and Lifespan in the US Health and Retirement Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disparities in the pace of biological aging among midlife adults of the same chronological age have implications for future frailty risk and policy 95%
- Longitudinal changes in epigenetic clocks predict survival in the InCHIANTI cohort 94%
- A Unified Framework for Systematic Curation and Evaluation of Aging Biomarkers 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.