Back

Epigenetic Aging Clocks Associate with Cognitive Status but Not Cognitive Decline: Evidence from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative

Feng, B.; Gao, A.; Yang, J.

2026-05-13 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.11.26352912 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive impairment is a major source of disability in Parkinsonian disorders, yet biomarkers that distinguish cognitive status from cognitive decline remain limited. DNA methylation-based epigenetic aging measures capture complementary dimensions of biological aging, but it remains unclear whether they primarily reflect stable differences in cognitive vulnerability or longitudinal cognitive change. We examined associations between epigenetic aging measures and global cognition in the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort. Seven epigenetic aging measures were derived from peripheral blood DNA methylation data, and cognition was assessed longitudinally using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Linear mixed-effects models were applied in complementary frameworks, including baseline-plus-change-from-baseline models and within-person versus between-person decomposition models. Secondary analyses included baseline clock-by-time interaction models and a decline-focused sensitivity analysis. Across analyses, higher epigenetic aging was consistently associated with lower overall MoCA scores. In the baseline-plus-change-from-baseline models, the analytic baseline component showed the dominant signal, whereas the change-from-baseline terms were not significant after false discovery rate correction. In the within-person versus between-person decomposition models, associations were concentrated in the between-person component, while within-person deviation terms were not significant. Secondary analyses were consistent with this pattern. Together, these findings suggest that blood-based epigenetic aging measures may be more informative as biomarkers of cognitive status or vulnerability than as markers of short-term cognitive progression. Larger studies with longer follow-up and more detailed cognitive phenotyping are needed to clarify their longitudinal relevance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.2%
2
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
3
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
5
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
7
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
8
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.8%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Molecular Neurodegeneration
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
18
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%