Back

Cross-cohort insights into the association of handgrip strength transitions and burdens with cardiovascular disease risk

Lin, H.; zeng, p.

2026-03-09 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.05.26347756 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrevious studies established handgrip strength (HGS) as a potential risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, existing studies focused exclusively on baseline HGS and neglected longitudinal changes in HGS during follow-up. Thus, our aim was to investigate the associations of transitions and dynamic burdens of HGS with incident CVD risk. MethodsWe analyzed data from the UK Biobank (UKB), the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), and the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing (KLOSA). We defined HGS transitions based on HGS at baseline and the first follow-up, and created three indicators to reflect HGS burdens. Cox models were applied to examine the association of HGS transitions and burdens with incident CVD risk. The predictive value of HGS indices was also evaluated. ResultsA total of 73,555 participants were retained, and 4,722 (6.4%) incident CVD cases were identified during follow-up. Transition analyses revealed that increased HGS during follow-up was associated with reduced CVD risk, whereas decreased HGS was associated with an elevated risk. Per standard deviation decrement in HGS slope, cumulative HGS and relative cumulative HGS led to a 19.8% (95%CI 1.5~41.5%), 44.0% (95%CI 10.8~87.2%) or 26.7% (95%CI 9.4~46.8%) elevated risk of CVD, respectively. These associations were independent of and more pronounced than HGS, with stronger effects observed in East Asian cohorts (CHARLS and KLOSA) compared to European cohorts (UKB and SHARE). Incorporating dynamic HGS metrics enhanced the predictive accuracy, with HGS burdens providing greater gains than HGS. For the optimal models, all HGS indices resulted in an increase of AUC up to 7.6% in Europeans and 5.9% in East Asians. ConclusionsHGS burdens outperformed in predicting cardiovascular health compared to single cross-sectional HGS itself, suggesting the clinical utility of longitudinal HGS monitoring in clinical and public health strategies for CVD prevention.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.1%
4
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.5%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
12
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
13
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%