Back

18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters predict prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Zhang, L.; Jin, L.

2026-03-03 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.02.28.26347307 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of quantitative analysis of {superscript 1}F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) metabolic parameters in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and imaging data of 44 patients with pathologically confirmed PDAC who received NACT. All patients completed standard chemotherapy regimens and underwent {superscript 1}F-FDG PET/CT examinations within 2 weeks before and after chemotherapy. Multiple metabolic parameters of lesions were extracted, their percentage changes were calculated, and the optimal cut-off values for each parameter were determined. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were applied to explore the prognostic value of the metabolic parameters, and the prognostic stratification performance of PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) 1.0 was compared with that of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. PERCIST 1.0 demonstrated significantly superior prognostic stratification compared with RECIST 1.1. A peak standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak2) > 3.07 and a percentage change in SULpeak between pre- and post-treatment scans ({Delta}SULpeak%) [≤] 37.66% were identified as independent risk factors for poor prognosis. Furthermore, SUL-related parameters exhibited markedly better predictive efficacy than traditional metabolic parameters such as the standardized uptake value and metabolic tumor volume. Quantitative analysis of {superscript 1}F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters can effectively predict prognosis in PDAC after NACT, and PERCIST 1.0 is a more optimal criterion for efficacy and prognostic assessment. A post-NACT SULpeak > 3.07 and {Delta}SULpeak% [≤] 37.66% were core independent indicators for predicting poor prognosis in these patients.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
4
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.5%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
7
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
15
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
23
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
29
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%