Back

Mortality prediction by a metabolomics score and health- and lifestyle-related factors combined

Schorr, K.; Rodriguez Girondo, M.; de Groot, L.; Slagboom, P. E.; Beekman, M.

2026-02-03 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.01.26345306 medRxiv
Show abstract

The ageing society and worldwide rise of chronic disease make adequate early identification of at-risk individuals and preventive intervention highly relevant to public health. Molecular indicators of global health have been developed, such as metabolomics-based MetaboHealth. A shortcoming of molecular biomarkers may be their lack of integration of lifestyle and environmental factors relevant for health span. Hence, we explored the MetaboHealth biomarker and a range of health- and lifestyle factors, including plant based diet index, physical activity, alcohol use, smoking, medication use, 25(OH)D status and socioeconomic position and education in a subpopulation (n=35,192, mean age=56 years) from the UK Biobank cohort. We analysed which of these factors associated independently with mortality; which associated with the MetaboHealth score and which of the independent factors improve mortality prediction by MetaboHealth. By applying multivariate Cox regression modelling we found that all factors associated independently with prospective survival, except for physical activity and education level. Sex, smoking and income were most strongly associated with both mortality and the MetaboHealth score. By cross-validation we subsequently assessed contribution of all independent health- and lifestyle-related factors to MetaboHealth-based mortality prediction and computed a weighted score. We found income and medication intake to be the most and diet the least prominently adding contributors. In conclusion, MetaboHealth partly reflects the effect of health- and lifestyle-related factors, while identification of at-risk individuals is improved by the information on income and medication use. Insights in these factors can be attained non-intrusively and may therefore be taken into account in the context of population health management.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.6%
3
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
27
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%