Effect of virtual reality on upper limb recovery in early-stage stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hernandez-Martinez, A.; Fernandez-Escabias, M.; Carrilho-Candeias, S.; Ruiz-Gonzalez, D.; Ramos-Teodoro, M.; Gil-Rodriguez, M.; del Olmo Iruela, L.; Rodriguez Camacho, M.; Pascasio, L. A.; Perez Ortega, I.; Martinez-Sanchez, P.; Soriano-Maldonado, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundVirtual reality (VR) is increasingly used to enhance upper limb rehabilitation after stroke, yet its effectiveness during the acute and subacute phases--critical windows for neuroplasticity--remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of VR-based interventions on upper limb outcomes in individuals within six months post-stroke and examined potential moderators of treatment response. MethodsFive databases and grey literature were searched to June 2024. Randomised controlled trials including adults [≤]6 months post-stroke and comparing VR-based rehabilitation with non-technological interventions were eligible. Random-effects models were used to pool mean differences (MDs). Subgroup analyses, random-effects meta-regressions, and sensitivity analyses were performed when data allowed. Risk of bias (RoB2) and certainty of evidence (GRADE) were assessed. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251104058). ResultsTwenty-eight trials (1,310 participants) were included. VR significantly improved motor impairment (FM-UE: MD = 3.82, 95% CI 2.16 5.48; I{superscript 2} = 83.8%) and movement speed (WMFT-time: MD = -0.52, 95% CI -0.87 to -0.18; I{superscript 2} = 0%). No significant effects were found for ARAT, BBT, or handgrip strength. Heterogeneity was substantial across most outcomes. Moderator analyses identified an age-related reduction in VR effects on handgrip strength and a time-dose interaction for BBT. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of pooled estimates. ConclusionsVR-based rehabilitation may enhance motor impairment and execution speed in the subacute phase after stroke, but evidence for functional improvements is limited. High heterogeneity, low methodological quality of included trials, and very low GRADE certainty for most outcomes warrant cautious interpretation. High-quality, standardised, and adequately powered trials are needed.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Upper Limb Motor Improvement after TBI: Systematic Review of Interventions 96%
- Comparing a novel neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose, intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: The SMARTS2 randomized trial 95%
- The detrimental effect of stroke on motor adaptation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 94%
- Disparities in Access to, Use of, and Quality of Rehabilitation Care Following Stroke: A Scoping Review 94%
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of Acupuncture on Lower Limb Motor Dysfunction Following Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 95%
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 95%
- Postural control telerehabilitation with a low-cost virtual reality protocol for children with cerebral palsy: Protocol for a clinical trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rest the Brain to Learn New Gait Patterns after Stroke 94%
- “It all ends too soon” - Exploring stroke survivors and physiotherapists perspectives on stroke rehabilitation and the role of technology for promoting access to rehabilitation in the community 92%
- Brain-Computer Interface Robotics for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous theta-burst stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex for promotion of upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial 95%
- Trial of high-intensity gait training and step monitoring for stroke 94%
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.