Trust in scientists and conspiracy beliefs predict online misinformation susceptibility and fake news detection: a cross-sectional study in Greece
Katsiroumpa, A.; Moisoglou, I.; Konstantakopoulou, O.; Galani, O.; Tsiachri, M.; Galanis, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundOnline misinformation has grown significantly with the widespread use of the internet and the ease of sharing content through social media, often without rigorous fact-checking or scientific validation. In this context, trust in scientists and conspiracy beliefs may affect online misinformation susceptibility and fake news detection. ObjectiveTo examine the effect of trust in scientists and conspiracy beliefs on online misinformation susceptibility and fake news detection. Additionally, we investigated the association between demographic variables and online misinformation susceptibility and fake news detection. MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in Greece, with data collected through an online survey in August 2025. Trust in scientists was assessed using the Trust in Scientists Scale. Conspiracy beliefs were measured using the Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Participants susceptibility to online misinformation was evaluated using the Online Misinformation Susceptibility Scale. Their ability to detect online fake news was assessed through the fake news detection scale. ResultsOur multivariable analysis identified that lower trust in scientists is associated with higher online misinformation susceptibility. Participants who believed in conspiracy behaviors showed also higher levels of misinformation susceptibility. Moreover, lower financial status and lower interest in politics were associated with misinformation susceptibility. We found a positive association between trust in websites and misinformation susceptibility. Also, we found a negative association between age and misinformation susceptibility. Our multivariable linear regression model showed that participants who believe in conspiracy beliefs had a lower ability to detect fake news. Moreover, we found a positive association between trust in sciences and fake news detection. Finally, we found a negative association between interest in politics and fake news detection. ConclusionOur findings showed associations between trust in scientists, conspiracy beliefs, online misinformation susceptibility and fake news detection. Moreover, several demographic variables were associated with misinformation susceptibility and fake news detection. Identification of predictors of misinformation susceptibility and fake news detection is crucial to define high-risk groups and develop appropriate interventions to confront these issues.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Who is (Not) Complying with the Social Distancing Directive and Why? Testing a General Framework of Compliance with Multiple Measures of Social Distancing 94%
- What triggers online help-seeking retransmission during the COVID-19 period? Empirical evidence from Chinese social media 93%
- Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19: Beliefs in misinformation in the Australian community 93%
- Assessing the community risk perception toward COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea: evidence from Google and NAVER relative search volume 92%
- Abusers indoors and coronavirus outside: an examination of public discourse about COVID-19 and family violence on Twitter using machine learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How Americans encounter guns: Mixed methods content analysis of YouTube and internet search data 92%
- Do predictors of adherence to pandemic guidelines change over time? A panel study of 21,000 UK adults during the COVID-19 pandemic 90%
- Forgoing healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic in Geneva, Switzerland - a cross-sectional population-based study 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Twitter and Census Data Analytics to Explore Socioeconomic Factors for Post-COVID-19 Reopening Sentiment 91%
- Anticipatory Emotions and Academic Performance: The Role of Boredom in a Preservice Teachers' Lab Experience 90%
- Mental Health and Stress Level of Ukrainians Seeking Psychological Help Online 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social distance and SARS memory: impact on the public awareness of 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak 91%
- Speaker responses to audience-induced social-evaluative threat: Evidence from scientific presentation tasks in immersive virtual reality 90%
- Yet another lockdown? A large-scale study on people’s unwillingness to be confined during the first 5 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.