Back

Computational Assessment of Memory Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Donors

Wilschut, T. J.; Knobbe, T. J.; Stocco, A.; Hake, H.; Posthummus, A. M.; Ziengs, A. L.; Investigators, T.; Blokzijl, H.; Damman, K.; de Meijer, V. E.; de Borst, M. R.; Buunk, A. M.; Spikman, J. M.; van Rijn, H.; Bakker, S. J. L.

2025-10-03 transplantation
10.1101/2025.10.01.25337071 medRxiv
Show abstract

Impaired memory function is a frequent yet understudied symptom in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we demonstrate a remote, minimally burdensome memory screener, the Seattle-Groningen Memory Assessment (SGMA), which estimates a patients speed of forgetting from paired-associate learning. We show that the memory score derived from an 8-minute session is a reliable and accurate measure of an individuals ability for long-term retention. Kidney transplant recipients (n=556) showed more forgetting than (potential) donors (n=408). Memory scores were sensitive to demographics (age and education level), and related to self-reported sleep quality, fatigue, and health-related quality of life. On the physiological level, we were able to link more forgetting in recipients to more monocytes, neutrophils, reticulocytes, and a higher white blood cell count, as well as lower ferritin and more iron deficiency. Overall, this work highlights the potential of computational memory assessment as a minimally burdensome and reliable tool for detecting cognitive impairments in complex multimorbidity populations. The approach may be particularly valuable in research settings where detecting subtle changes in cognitive health--often missed by existing assessments--is crucial for understanding disease progression and treatment effects.

Published in Communications Medicine (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.