Endoscopic coagulation with clipping: a novel, simple, and effective strategy for colonic diverticular bleeding
Matsui, T.; Tanaka, C.; Horie, A.; Niwa, Y.; Satoh, M.; Nakano, O.; Oka, H.; Honda, Y.; Takamura, M.
Show abstract
Background and study aimsColonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) is a common cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, and rebleeding remains a significant clinical challenge despite various hemostatic techniques. Clipping and endoscopic band ligation are commonly performed; however, the efficacy of endoscopic coagulation with clipping (ECC) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ECC in treating CDB. Patients and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 217 patients with suspected CDB seen at our institution between January 2017 and December 2024. Clinical outcomes, such as rebleeding rates within 30 days, adverse events, and length of hospital stay were assessed. ECC was defined as thermal coagulation of the bleeding vessel within the diverticulum, followed by closure with clips to reinforce hemostasis and prevent perforation. ResultsOf these, 202 patients underwent colonoscopic evaluation (15 were excluded due to spontaneous hemostasis or other reasons before endoscopy), 74 (36.6%) underwent ECC for hemostasis. Rebleeding occurred in 7 patients (9.5%) within 30 days. Diverticulitis with subsequent colonic perforation was observed in one patient (1.4%), who improved with conservative treatment, and exhibited no fatal adverse events. ConclusionsWith a favorable safety profile and low rebleeding rates, ECC can be a treatment option for CDB. Its simplicity and low reliance on specialized equipment make it a practical alternative to other hemostatic methods in clinical practice.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An effect of the COVID-19 pandemic: significantly more complicated appendicitis due to delayed presentation of patients! 94%
- The safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosylate combined with propofol in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial 93%
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 93%
- Nonendoscopic Detection Of Barrett’S Esophagus In Patients Without Gerd Symptoms 91%
- Prune intake ameliorates chronic constipation symptoms and causes little discomfort from diarrhea and loose stools: A randomized placebo-controlled trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sphincterotomy for Biliary Sphincter of Oddi Disorder and idiopathic Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis: THE RESPOND LONGITUDINAL COHORT 91%
- Multi-centre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web-tool 90%
- Optimising Early Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Biologics Era: Admission Model for Intensification of Therapy in Acute Severe Colitis (ADMIT–ASC) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Procalcitonin to Predict Severity of Acute Cholangitis and Need for Urgent Biliary Decompression: Systematic Scoping Review 92%
- Aerodigestoscopy (ADS): A retrospective examination of the feasibility, safety, and comfort of a new procedure for the evaluation of physiological disorders of the aerodigestive tract 91%
- The development of a multidisciplinary care pathway for patients with inflammatory bowel disease before, during and after pregnancy 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective evaluation of transpancreatic sphincterotomy comparing to needle-knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation: short-and long-term outcomes 93%
- Long-Term Outcomes Of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation (Eus-Rfa) For Advanced Pancreatic And Periampullary Adenocarcinoma 92%
- Prediction of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula using radiomic features and preoperative data 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.