Addressing the long-term cardiovascular risks of cardiotoxic therapies and emphasizing the critical role of lifestyle interventions in enhancing the health and well-being of cancer survivors: Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
Singhal, R.; Sriram, R.; Reddy, S. T.; Gande, A.; Sivadasan, M.; Malkan, S.; Purewal, V.; Muneesh, S.; Sachdeva, D.; Dhall, S.; Khan, R.; Ramteke, H. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe increasing survival rates of cancer patients have led to a growing population of cancer survivors, but the long-term cardiovascular risks associated with cardiotoxic cancer therapies remain a significant concern. These therapies, including chemotherapy, radiation, and targeted treatments, are known to increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) such as heart failure, arrhythmias, and ischemic heart disease. MethodsThis meta-analysis, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of heart failure in adult cancer survivors exposed to cardiotoxic therapies. A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and CENTRAL, identifying 35 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 275,485 patients. Subgroup analyses compared cancer therapies with and without cardiotoxic effects, and meta-regression was performed to assess the impact of cofactors like hypertension, diabetes, and chemotherapy agents. ResultsA total of 35 RCTs, involving 275,485 patients, were included. The analysis showed a 42% increased risk of heart failure in cancer survivors exposed to cardiotoxic treatments (Risk Ratio [RR] 0.08; 95% CI: -0.57; 0.73). Hypertension (Z = 4.75, P = 0.000), diabetes (Z = -4.87, P = 0.000), and anthracycline use (Z = 2.08, P = 0.037) were significant risk factors. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher heart failure rates in those receiving anthracyclines. ConclusionComprehensive cardiovascular monitoring and lifestyle interventions are essential for mitigating the long-term cardiovascular risks in cancer survivors, improving their health outcomes and quality of life.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 94%
- A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of an early invasive strategy compared to a conservative approach in elderly patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome 94%
- Assessing Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Vietnamese Heart Failure Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Role of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Managing Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction 95%
- Heart disease mortality in cancer survivors: A population-based study in Japan 94%
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating Bioinformatics and Machine Learning to Investigate the Mechanisms by Which Three Major Respiratory Infectious Diseases Exacerbate Heart Failure 93%
- Metformin Is Associated with Favorable Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 93%
- Metabolomic profile for understanding heart failure classifications 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 92%
- Functional signatures in non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex-based differences in transcriptomic studies 91%
- Loss of CHGA protein as a potential biomarker for colon cancer diagnosis: a study on biomarker discovery by machine learning and confirmation by immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer tissue microarrays 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.