Clinical outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in 21 patients with Relapse/Refractory Ileocecal Region B cell lymphoma

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory ileocecal region lymphoma and provide evidence for salvage therapy. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 21 ileocecal region lymphoma patients (IC group) and matched 23 non-ileocecal lymphoma patients (non-IC group) treated with CAR-T therapy between June 2014 and August 2024. Baseline characteristics, genetic mutations (next-generation sequencing), CAR-T cell kinetics (digital PCR), treatment response (WHO criteria), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and Lasso models were used to identify prognostic factors. ResultsThe IC group showed significantly lower 3-month objective response rate (ORR) (55.56% versus 86.96%, P=0.036) and shorter median PFS (3.5 months versus 27 months, P=0.0003) compared to the non-IC group, but no OS difference (P=0.766). CAR-T cell expansion was higher in the IC group (CD19 Cmax: 67,290 versus 35,400, P=0.009), but persistence was similar. TP53 mutations (42.86% in IC group) showed no significant correlation with treatment response. Safety profiles (cytokine release syndrome [CRS] and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome[ICANS]) were comparable between groups (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis identified poor 3-month treatment response (HR=32.075, P=0.015) and higher pre-treatment lines (HR=8.6, P=0.036) as independent risk factors for PFS. Delayed B-cell recovery and low baseline lymphocyte counts were associated with worse OS. ConclusionCAR-T therapy is feasible and safe for relapsed/refractory ileocecal lymphoma, but short-term efficacy (ORR, PFS) is inferior to non-ileocecal patients. High CAR-T expansion did not improve long-term outcomes. Early response assessment (3 months), baseline lymphocyte levels, and B-cell recovery are critical prognostic indicators, suggesting the need for optimized timing and combination strategies to enhance efficacy.