Attitudes and Perceptions of University Students and Postdoctoral Fellows in the Medical and Life Sciences Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in the Educational Process: A Large-Scale, International Cross-Sectional Survey
Ng, J. Y.; Shah, A. Q.; Roni, E.; Asna, M.; Brar, J.; Kathirkamanathan, S.; Li, W.; Lokker, C.; Iorio, A.; Haynes, R. B.; Moher, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundArtificial intelligence chatbots (AICs) are advanced systems capable of generating and processing human-like text, and are being increasingly integrated in various fields, including education. Despite their potential to significantly impact learning, little is known about university students and postdoctoral fellows (US&PD) views on AICs in educational settings. This study investigated the familiarity, perceptions, and factors influencing adoption of AICs by US&PDs in the life and medical sciences. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey. Recruitment involved two approaches: (1) using R script on PubMED metadata to extract contact details of corresponding authors with recent MEDLINE-indexed publications, and (2) collecting publicly listed contact information of program administrators from the top 50 global, English-speaking universities, as ranked by the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) list. Both authors and administrators were contacted and requested to forward the survey to US&PDs. The survey was administered via SurveyMonkey from February 2 to March 18, 2024, with two reminder emails sent between February 14 and 26, 2024. ResultsA total of 1,209 responses were analyzed. Most respondents identified as female (62.07%) and were enrolled in doctoral (40.48%) or masters programs (17.55%). Over 63% were familiar with AICs, with ChatGPT being the most used (60.3%). While many recognized the educational value of AICs, concerns about reliability and integration into academia persisted. Calls for more training and institutional support were common. ConclusionsThe study underscores the potential and challenges of AICs in education. While enthusiasm exists, significant concerns remain about their implementation, requiring targeted training and policy development.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 96%
- High School Science Fair: What Students Say -- Mastery, Performance, and Self-Determination Theory 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 95%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 94%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The urgent need for phased university reopenings to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and conserve institutional resources: A modeling study 93%
- COVID-19 Prevention at Institutions of Higher Education, United States, 2020 – 2021: Implementation of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions 93%
- The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.