Back

A Clinical study to evaluate efficacy of CaFi (Branded ingredient of Cassia Fistula Extract) in the healthy individuals having Irregular bowel habits-An Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Multi centric, Interventional, Prospective, Clinical Study.

Tamoli, S.; Chitrakar, M.; Londhe, N.; Swami, S. I.; Harit, M. K.; Londhe, S.; Hiremath, C.; Dubey, R.; Mulye, N. N.

2025-06-02 gastroenterology
10.1101/2025.05.28.25328477 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIrregular bowel habits including constipation are common gastrointestinal issues, significantly impacting quality of life. While conventional pharmacological treatments exist, they often come with side effects and offer limited long-term relief, driving interest towards safer, effective herbal alternatives. Cassia fistula (C. fistula) has long been recognized for its laxative properties and has been reported to be a safer alternative to Senna (Cassia angustifolia). PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a standardized extract of C. fistula compared to Senna extract in healthy individuals experiencing irregular bowel habits. MethodsA two-arm, open-label, randomized, multicentric, interventional, prospective clinical study was conducted in India with 70 participants (35 per group). One group received the standardized C. fistula extract and the other group received Senna extract for 14 days, followed by a 7-day post-consumption follow-up. Primary outcomes included changes in bowel movement frequency. Secondary outcomes assessed stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale), straining, bowel satisfaction after defecation, anorectal blockage, use of manual manoeuvres, average time spent on defecation, time to first bowel evacuation post intervention and associated clinical symptoms (headache, belching, flatulence, abdominal distension, acidity). Safety was evaluated through vitals, laboratory parameters, and adverse events. ResultsC. fistula extract significantly increased bowel movement frequency (3.30 {+/-} 0.92 to 5.90 {+/-} 1.24 at Day 14, p<0.05) and improved stool consistency comparable to Senna extract. Straining and bowel satisfaction after defecation also significantly improved with the use of C. Fistula. Notably, C. fistula extract showed significantly greater reduction in the sensation of anorectal blockage at Days 14 and 21 (p<0.05) and a faster onset of action (shorter time to first defecation) compared to Senna. Associated symptoms of constipation also reduced significantly. C. fistula extract was better well-tolerated, with fewer product-related adverse events compared to Senna. ConclusionC. fistula extract was found to be effective in irregular bowel habits, offering comparable efficacy to Senna while proving to be superior in reducing the sensation of anorectal blockage and achieving a faster time to first bowel evacuation. It also demonstrated a more favorable safety profile with significantly fewer product-related adverse events. Therefore, C. fistula extract represents a promising non-habit-forming herbal alternative for bowel regulation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.2%
3
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
7
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
8
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
9
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%