Back

Proteomic and Genetic predictors and risk scores of cardiovascular diseases in persons living with HIV

Mehta, T.; Haine, L.; Baker, J.; Reilly, C.; Duprez, D.; Mistry, S.; Steffen, B.; Jain, M. K.; Arenas-Pinto, A.; Polizzotto, M.; Staub, T.; Safo, S. E.

2025-05-13 hiv aids
10.1101/2025.05.08.25327219 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiovascular diseases (CVD) prediction models for persons living with HIV (PLWH) depend on traditional CVD risk factors, but these underestimate true risk. We aimed to identify proteins and genetic variants and create proteo-genomic risk scores for CVD in PLWH. MethodsWe analyzed genetic and protein data from participants involved in trials for PLWH. We used state-of-the-art statistical methods for data integration, identified correlated signatures, and developed a protein score (PS) and a genetic score (GS) to predict CVD. We conducted functional enrichment analysis to explore biological functions of signatures identified in relation to CVD. ResultsA panel of 14 proteins and a set of 15 genetic variants were found to be better at distinguishing between CVD cases and controls than individual proteins or genetic variants. The PS or GS was each independently associated with a higher risk of CVD. Combining CVD-, HIV-related factors, genetics, and protein scores resulted in the most powerful discrimination. Functional enrichment analysis showed an upregulation of the cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and strong enrichment for inflammation related pathways such as the pathogen induced cytokine storm. ConclusionsA panel of protein biomarkers, some new (IGFBP7, HGF) and some previously known in PLWH (CLEC6A), could help identify PLWH at higher risk of developing CVD. If confirmed, these scores could be used with CVD and HIV-related factors to identify PLWH at risk for CVD who would benefit from proactive risk reduction strategies.

Published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.