Back

Measurement and decomposition of socioeconomic inequality in functional disability among adults aged 45: A cohort-based cross-sectional study in China

Huang, M.; Fan, J.; Yang, X.; Chen, T.

2025-04-25 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.04.24.25326387 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe concurrent process of population aging and rapid economic development in China has generated a heightened interest in the health inequalities experienced by middle-aged and older adults. This study aims to quantify the trends of socioeconomic inequality for functional disability and unraveled the underlying contributors. Study DesignA cross-sectional design based on four distinct years (2011 to 2018) was utilized. MethodsData were extracted from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), encompassing a total of 66,988 participants aged [≥]45 years. Socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed based on wealth variables. The SES inequality was quantified using concentration indices. Decomposition method was employed to disentangle the contributions to inequality. ResultsThe prevalence of functional disability among adults aged [≥]45 years increased from 14.9% (95% CI: 14.4 to 15.5) in 2011 to 16.4% (95% CI: 15.8 to 17.0) in 2018. The normalized concentration indices increased from -0.149 (95% CI: -0.161 to -0.137) in 2011 to -0.176 (95% CI: -0.163 to -0.188) in 2018. The primary contributors to inequality were socioeconomic status, age, social activity participation and city development, while medical insurance and city hospital beds per capital had mitigating effects. ConclusionsEfforts to address this inequality should encompass policy considerations to diminish SES disparity, foster equitable resources across cities, and sustain healthcare insurance initiatives.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.