Incidence and risk factors of rectovaginal fistula after rectal cancer surgery:a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hu, B.; Zheng, Y.; Ti, A.; Zhu, Y.; Li, X.
Show abstract
BackgroundRectovaginal fistula (RVF) is a unique complication for women after rectal cancer surgery (RCS). Understanding its incidence and risk factors can help further recognize and prevent the disease. Although there have been studies on the risk factors for RVF after RCS, the results show some heterogeneity and even contradictory conclusions due to differences in trial design, sample size, study population, and treatment methods, etc. However, no relevant meta-analyses have been found to date. This study aims to investigate the incidence and risk factors of RVF after RCS through a meta-analysis. MethodsA systematic literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from the establishment of the database to June 2024. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis was performed using R Studio 4.3.2 software. ResultsA total of 1 randomized controlled study and 7 non-randomized controlled studies were included, involving 4920 patients, among which 134 cases had RVF. The meta-analysis results showed that the incidence of RVF after RCS was 3.2% (95%CI: 1.9% [~] 7.8%). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy,tumors in lower position,longer surgery duration and double-stapled technique were risk factors for the occurrence of RVF after RCS. Laparoscopic technique was a protective factor for RVF after RCS. T4 stage,age,diabetes,ASA anesthesia classification, Prior hysterectomy, Combined pelvic organ resection, and vaginectomy had no significant effect on RVF. ConclusionThe incidence of RVF after RCS is higher than the general cognition, which should be paid attention to by surgeons. The results of this study may help surgeons identify high-risk inpatients in time, take corresponding measures in advance, and expect to reduce the incidence of the disease.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intraoperative calculus or hemorrhage in transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy as a risk factor for recurrent hemospermia 96%
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 96%
- Squamous differentiation portends poor prognosis in low and intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Losartan on Portal hypertension and Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review 94%
- The Impact of Fasting the Holy Month of Ramadan on Colorectal Cancer Patients and Two Tumor Biomarkers: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience 94%
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- PDAC-ANN: an artificial neural network to predict Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma based on gene expression 93%
- Comparative transcriptome of normal and cancer- associated fibroblasts 93%
- Effectiveness of educational intervention on breast cancer knowledge and breast self-examination among female university students in Bangladesh: a pre-post quasi-experimental one group study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The PBL teaching method in Neurology Education in the Traditional Chinese Medicine undergraduate students: An Observational Study 93%
- The effectiveness of acupuncture point stimulation for the prevention of post-operative sore throat: a meta-analysis. 92%
- Upregulation of ARHGAP9 is correlated with poor prognosis and immune infiltration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 90%
- Prune intake ameliorates chronic constipation symptoms and causes little discomfort from diarrhea and loose stools: A randomized placebo-controlled trial 89%
- Social Determinants of Health Factors Associated with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Prevalence and Severity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.