Back

Perceptions of health-related quality of life among heart transplant recipients: a qualitative study

Mahmoudi, R.; Adoli, L. K.; BATTISTELLA, P.; Sebbag, L.; Guillemin, F.; Couchoud, C.

2025-03-14 transplantation
10.1101/2025.03.11.25322903 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThere is a need to improve knowledge of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the post-heart transplantation (HTx) period and the factors affecting it. This qualitative study aimed to identify the most important domains of HRQoL for heart transplant recipients and the factors that impact it. MethodsThis was a qualitative study across 5 geographically diverse large HTx centers in France from July 2022 to January 2023. We gathered a purposive sample of individuals who had undergone HTx. A face-to-face semi-structured interview guide was used for individual interviews. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. ResultsA total of 14 individuals (10 men) were interviewed. The data analysis led to the development of 8 main themes (with sub-themes) that were relevant to participants: HRQoL perception (mental health, physical capacity, symptoms and comorbidities), participants experience during the HTx process, immunosuppressive treatments, relationship with the healthcare team, external and internal resources, socio-economic aspects and feelings about the donor. Recipients, spontaneously made connections between these themes. ConclusionsHeart transplant recipients had diverse perceptions of their HRQoL in the post-HTx period. The rich variety of themes identified from the review highlights that recipients have a complex HRQoL profile which is not currently captured by standard HRQoL tools that are commonly employed. These aspects should be taken into account in the clinical follow-up and in the selection of the most appropriate Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

Published in Transplantation Proceedings · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.