Provenance and funding of extremely cited biomedical papers published in 2003-2004, 2013-2014 and 2023-2024
Ioannidis, J.
Show abstract
ImportanceIt is important to monitor changes in biomedical literature and its funding. China has surpassed the USA in publications and, in some analyses, also in some impact indicators. ObjectiveTo evaluate changes over time in the profiles of the most highly cited biomedical papers. DesignThe 100 top-cited biomedical papers (based on Scopus) published in each of three time periods (2003-4, 2013-4, and 2023-4) were assessed for corresponding authors, types of publications represented, and funding sources, with emphasis on funding from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) that has been traditionally considered the major funder of biomedical research. SettingGlobal. Participantsnot relevant Exposuresnot relevant Main outcome measuresProvenance and funding sources. Main findingsCorresponding authors from the USA decreased overtime (59/100 papers in 2003-4, 58/100 in 2013-4, 45/100 in 2023-4). China had corresponding authors in 0,1, and 4 top cited papers in the three time periods, respectively. There was a marked increase in consensus items (10/100 in 2003-4 versus 24/100 in 2023-4) and in reference statistics papers (1/100 in 2003-4, 10/100 in 2013-4, 11/100 in 2023-4). Reviews remained common among top cited papers, but almost always they were non-systematic. NIH funding was listed in 45/100, 50/100, and 23/100 papers in the three time periods, respectively. All other countries combined surpassed US public funding in 2023-4. Funding by NIH alone decreased sharply in the last decade (32/100, 28/100, and 2/100 in the three time periods, respectively). More commonly listed funding from non-profit organizations, societies, and institutions complemented the NIH funding decline. The first authors of 7/45 and the corresponding author(s) of 14/45 top cited USA-based papers of 2023-4 were listed as leaders of active NIH grants in RePORTER as of February 2025. Citation gaming became more obvious in 2023-4. Conclusions and relevanceOverall, the USA remains a world leader regarding the most highly cited biomedical research and NIH funding retains a substantial presence among top cited papers. However, NIH influence has shrunk overall, and top cited papers funded exclusively by NIH have almost disappeared. Strengthening public funding is essential to secure research serves the common good.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19-related research data availability and quality according to the FAIR principles: A meta-research study 96%
- The Rise of Open Data Practices Among Bioscientists at the University of Edinburgh 95%
- Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open-access publishing each year 96%
- Reporting of Retrospective Registration in Clinical Trial Publications 93%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project 95%
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 95%
- Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Full Publication of Preprint Articles in Prevention Research: An Analysis of Publication Proportions and Results Consistency 93%
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 92%
- A natural language processing system for the efficient extraction of cell markers 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 93%
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 93%
- High-cited favorable studies for COVID-19 treatments ineffective in large trials 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.